Archaeological Evidences for the Book of Mormon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LivingWaters7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
[Mesoamerica seems to do a lot more positive for the BOM than NY based on my study. There have been some writings about the stone box in old LDS documents, but I do not recall much about them. I recall broken and toward the bottom of the hill. Certainly the stone box would be quite a cool relic, so perhaps its absence can be a point against it ever existing. The hiding of records in this way and the writing on metal plates were once criticized too, but this has been found now.
DNA studies do not support a Mesoamerican location for the Book of Mormon. The latest nail in this coffin is the paper “A Generic Atlas of Humans Admixture”.
Modern genetic data combined with appropriate statistical methods have the potential to contribute substantially to our understanding of human history. We have developed an approach that exploits the genomic structure of admixed populations to date and characterize historical mixture events at fine scales. We used this to produce an atlas of worldwide human admixture history, constructed by using genetic data alone and encompassing over 100 events occurring over the past 4000 years. We identified events whose dates and participants suggest they describe genetic impacts of the Mongol empire, Arab slave trade, Bantu expansion, first millennium CE migrations in Eastern Europe, and European colonialism, as well as unrecorded events, revealing admixture to be an almost universal force shaping human populations.
An interactive online atlas is available for free, here. If you click on the Maya population, you’ll see that the DNA matches to historical fact. You’ll notice, there is no DNA evidence that supports a history of Middle Eastern admixture.

While you may have a personal opinion that Cumorah is located in Mesoamerica, the scientific evidence doesn’t support your opinion.
[/quote]
 
Rebecca and jab42483,
The idea of progressively getting deeper and deeper into the deception is interesting. I teach my kids that this virtually always backfires. The idea that Joseph planned out much of his stuff beforehand seems to account better for his continued success. Numerous brilliant folks have very little problem with embracing Mormonism. The deception has certainly not served Joseph Smith since 1845. Whatever efforts were used to ensure that the deception didn’t become obvious long after Joseph’s death were pointless if Joseph was headed to hell for leading so many folks away from God and was do die so young (or even to die in his 80’s).

Joseph’s threats are not so common. There are a handful of examples for sure. The sword is the one I hear most about, but Joseph was not known as a spiteful and vindictive person. He was actually thought to be quite forgiving. The threats I am familiar with were either somehow sourced at God and thus are not condemnations of Joseph OR they were sourced at Joseph and he was a fraud all along. As such they do not weight strongly for or against his prophet hood (one must make a decision about Joseph’s prophethood first before they are evidence for anything). Outside of these, again, Joseph was known to be quite forgiving.

Truthsilence and iepuras,
I am unsure if you are being facetious when you criticize the article for having “nothing there.” For anyone who didn’t bother to read the article, that was precisely the point of the article.
freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2717186/posts
There are numerous artifacts from Mesoamerica that fit the BOM without any problems (that was one of the points of the reference article). But there is no framework upon which to judge the degree to which these artifacts corroborate or condemn the BOM.

PaulDupre1,
There is a lot of Dup-ing going on. Please forgive my pun.
The witnesses witnessed something. They may have not worded their statement and certainly didn’t offer a statement that would meet modern legal standards, but they witnessed something. For the 8 there was something physical leading may critics to attempt to explain the creation of some forged plates. For the three there was something quite powerful too.

Concerning the Spaulding theory:
Some people who understand the fine-tuning argument now argue for quantum inflation and a multi-verse. Who is using Occum’s Razor now? Those Atheists and their faith! The “Manuscript Found” killed the Spaulding theory for a while, but people with great faith in the divine origins of the Spaulding theory resurrected it with the manuscript still not found. In this respect critics are question beggars.
I think the BOM presents a strong enough positive case that it supports my somewhat negative view of the BOA. One of the ideas I entertain (but am not fully satisfied with) is the two Papyri theory on the BOA. I entertain this because the BOM and the CoJCoLDS intellectually win my allegiance. Why do critics of the church entertain the two Spaulding manuscript lost and still lost theory? I would suggest they are convinced consciously or less consciously that the BOM could not have come from the mind of Joseph Smith (I agree). But for whatever reason they are convinced it did not come from God.
I know a Catholic who boldly claims he is intellectually and spiritually a son of God’s Church. He cannot do much more than kindly nod when Muslims, Mormons, Protestants, or … make their case. I respect his position. If this is your reason for embracing the Spaulding manuscript, I kindly nod. It is not radically dissimilar to my acceptance of the BOA (though I do not bottom out on a particular solution to the problems).

Charity, TOm
 
Rebecca and jab42483,
The idea of progressively getting deeper and deeper into the deception is interesting. I teach my kids that this virtually always backfires. The idea that Joseph planned out much of his stuff beforehand seems to account better for his continued success. Numerous brilliant folks have very little problem with embracing Mormonism.
The fact that he reported his “First Vision” experience half a dozen different ways over the years suggests either he did not plan it out very well, or if he did, he had no compunction against changing details - “evolving” the doctrines - as it suited him. Not only the First Vision, but the Book of Commandments was seriously reworked to produce the Doctrine and Covenants, and the original “Pearl of Great Price” is nearly unrecognizable in today’s version of the same. These changes produced differences far greater than any that one sees in the synoptics; they are virtually different books with different, even opposing doctrines!

“His continued success” probably should be qualified. In a sense everything is successful that exists, since it exists. And every living thing is successful since it lives. Cannibalism was successful where it was tried, but hardly matches the success of Christian forbearance, and dodos didn’t succeed at world domination as well as have humans.
 
The witnesses witnessed something. They may have not worded their statement and certainly didn’t offer a statement that would meet modern legal standards, but they witnessed something. For the 8 there was something physical leading may critics to attempt to explain the creation of some forged plates. For the three there was something quite powerful too.

solution to the problems).
Charity, TOm
I’m not talking about a legal standard, just one of credibility, Joseph and Oliver writing statements for their friends and family just doesn’t cut it.
 
Rebecca and jab42483,
The idea of progressively getting deeper and deeper into the deception is interesting. I teach my kids that this virtually always backfires.

I’d say it ultimately did backfire for Smith.
The idea that Joseph planned out much of his stuff beforehand seems to account better for his continued success.
 
…and…? Leading people away from their Christian faith isn’t anything to be bragging about here. Lots of brilliant people leave Mormonism. What is the net brilliance?
Agree. I know a lot of smart people, people much smarter than I. But there a difference between being smart and having wisdom. A lot of smart people that I know are severely lacking in wisdom.
That of course is a good question, “Why does God let Mormonism exist?”, but the same question can be asked for any number of things. Mormonism is not unique. God indeed must have a reason for Mormonism, what that is, I haven’t seen.
it’s not that God has a plan that includes Mormonism. God simply created us with free will and we can make our own choices and if we chose, depart from the one faith handed down from the apostles. He even allows us to follow someone who invented a new gospel, 1,800 years after the death of Christ. I think of Exodus 32, the golden calf incident, whereby the Israeli people turned from worshipping the one true God in thirty days while waiting for Moses to come down from the mountain. These people similarly lacked faith and lacked wisdom. I’m sure there were a lot of smart people among them.

PnP
 
Truthsilence and iepuras, I am unsure if you are being facetious when you criticize the article for having “nothing there.” For anyone who didn’t bother to read the article, that was precisely the point of the article.
freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2717186/posts
There are numerous artifacts from Mesoamerica that fit the BOM without any problems (that was one of the points of the reference article). But there is no framework upon which to judge the degree to which these artifacts corroborate or condemn the BOM.

Charity, TOm
No, I wasn’t being facetious.

What might a Nephite pot look like? It might have a depiction of armored men carrying swords and spears riding on horses and chariots trotting off to battle.

Here is an article with some truly beautiful, faith affirming, early Christian artwork.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dura-Europos_church

Compelling.

The “Naive assumptions” article: Not compelling. At all.

Come home, Tom! :signofcross:
 
**Quoted by Tom:

** PnP - I do not believe the Hill Cumorah in NY is the Hill Cumorah in the BOM. Joseph Smith during his life certainly offered no consistent read on this. I do not look to LDS prophets for infallibility in matters of faith and morals,
**

Hi Tom,

Are you saying that we should ignore those who have built your church over the past 140 years?

“The great and last battle,** in which several hundred thousand Nephites perished was on the hill Cumorah, the same hill from which the plates were taken by Joseph Smith**, the boy about whom I spoke to you the other evening.” (Talk given by Apostle Orson Pratt, Feb. 11, 1872 Journal of Discourses Vol. 14, pg. 331)

"We visited the Hill Cumorah and were accorded the courtesy of going thereon by the wife of Mr. George Sampson, a brother of Admiral Wm. Sampson, who before his death owned the property…We were delighted to be there. Looking over the surrounding country we remembered that two great races of people had wound up their existence in the vicinity, had fought their last fight, and that hundreds of thousands had been slain within sight of that hill."(Elder George Albert Smith, Conference Report, April 1906, p.56)

"These records were carried by Ether from the hill Ramah, *afterwards called Cumorah, *where the Jaredites were destroyed, as well as the Nephites." (Talk given by Apostle Orson Pratt, May 18, 1873 Journal of Discourses Vol. 16, pg. 50

“Thirty-six years prior to this time his nation was destroyed in what we term **the State of New York, around about a hill, called by that people the Hill of Cumorah, when many **hundreds of thousands of the Nephites-men, women and children, fell, during the greatest battle that they had had with the Lamanites.” (Talk given by Apostle Orson Pratt, Aug. 25, 1878 Journal of Discourses Vol. 20, pg. 62)

"It will be, next Thursday night, 54 years since the Prophet Joseph Smith, then but a lad, **was permitted by the angel of the Lord to take the gold plates of the Book of Mormon from the hill Cumorah, as it was called in ancient times, located in the State of New York. " **(Talk given by Apostle Orson Pratt, Sept. 18, 1881 Journal of Discourses Vol. 22, pg. 224)

“Finally, they became so utterly wicked, so fully ripened for destruction, that one branch of the nation, **called the Nephites, gathered their entire people around the hill Cumorah, in the State of New York , in Ontario County; and the Lamanites, the opposite army, gathered by **millions in the same region. The two nations were four years in gathering their forces, during which no fighting took place; but at the end of that time, having marshalled all their hosts, the fighting commenced, the Lamanites coming upon the Nephites, and destroying all of them, except a very few, who had previously deserted over to the Lamanites.” (Talk given by Apostle Orson Pratt, April 6, 1874 Journal of Discourses Vol. 17, pg. 24)

"The passages which I have quoted from the Book of Mormon and the more extended discussion of this subject by Elder B. H. Roberts which was published in The Deseret News of March 3, 1928, definitely establish the following facts: That the Hill Cumorah, and the Hill Ramah are identical; that it was around this hill that the armies of both the Jaredites and Nephites, fought their great last battles; that it was in this hill that Mormon deposited all of the sacred records which had been entrusted to his care by Ammaron, except the abridgment which he had made from the plates of Nephi, which were delivered into the hands of his’ son, Moroni. We know positively that it was in this hill that Moroni deposited the abridgment made by his father, and his own abridgment of the record of the Jaredites, and that it was from this hill that Joseph Smith obtained possession of them. " (President Anthony W. Ivins, Conference Report, April 1928-Morning Session)

**“Cumorah, the artificial hill of north America, is well calculated to stand in this generation, as a monument of marvelous works and wonders. Around that mount died millions of the **Jaredites; yea, there ended one of the greatest nations of this earth. In that day, her inhabitants spread from sea to sea, and enjoyed national greatness and glory, nearly fifteen hundred years. – That people forsook the Lord and died in wickedness. There, too, fell the Nephites, after they had forgotten the Lord that bought them. There slept the records of age after age, for hundreds of years, even until the time of the Lord.” (The Latter-day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate, Vol.2, No.2, p.221)

"The hill, which was known by one division of the ancient peoples as Cumorah, by another as Ramah, is situated near Palmyra in the State of New York ." (Apostle James E. Talmage, Articles of Faith , chapter 14)

"It is known that the Hill Cumorah where the Nephites were destroyed is the hill where the Jaredites were also destroyed. This hill was known to the Jaredites as Rama. It was approximately near to the waters of Ripliancum, which the Book of Ether says, “by interpretation, is large, or to exceed all.” Mormon adds: “And it came to pass that we did march forth to the land of Cumorah, and we did pitch our tents round about the hill Cumorah; and it was in a land of many waters, rivers, and fountains; and here we had hope to gain advantage over the Lamanites.”

"It must be conceded that this description fits perfectly the land of Cumorah in New York, as it has been known since the visitation of Moroni to the Prophet Joseph Smith, for the hill is in the proximity of the Great Lakes and also in the land of many rivers and fountains. Moreover, the Prophet Joseph Smith himself is on record, definitely declaring the present hill called Cumorah to be the exact hill spoken of in the Book of Mormon.
 
continued:

“Further, the fact that all of his associates from the beginning down have spoken of it as the identical hill where Mormon and Moroni hid the records, must carry some weight. It is difficult for a reasonable person to believe that such men as Oliver Cowdery, Brigham Young, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, David Whitmer, and many others, could speak frequently of the Spot where the Prophet Joseph Smith obtained the plates as the Hill Cumorah, and not be corrected by the Prophet, if that were not the fact. That they did speak of this hill in the days of the Prophet in this definite manner is an established record of history…” (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation , Vol.3, Bookcraft, 1956, p.232-43.)
**
"In the western part of the state of New York near Palmyra is a prominent hill known as the “hill Cumorah.”** On July twenty-fifth of this year, as I stood on the crest of that hill admiring with awe the breathtaking panorama which stretched out before me on every hand, my mind reverted to the events which occurred in that vicinity some twenty-five centuries ago—events which brought to an end the great Jaredite nation .

[Editor’s Note: About 20 short paragraphs later this speaker says the following]

"This second civilization to which I refer, the Nephites , flourished in America between 600 B.C. and A.D. 400. Their civilization came to an end for the same reason, at the same place, and in the same manner as did the Jaredites’" (Talk given by President Marion G. Romney in General Conference, October 4, 1975, Ensign Nov. 1975 pg. 35)

Apostle LeGrand Richards, in A Marvelous Work and a Wonder, chapter 7, also stated that Cumorah is in New York.
**"Both the Nephite and Jaredite civilizations fought their final great wars of extinction at and near the Hill Cumorah (or Ramah as the Jaredites termed it), which hill is located between Palmyra and Manchester in the western part of the State of New York.
**

“Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and many of the early brethren, who were familiar with all the circumstances attending the coming forth of the Book of Mormon in this dispensation, have left us a pointed testimony as to the identity and location of Cumorah or Ramah.”(Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, page 174-175, Bookcraft 1966)

"This time it will have to do with so important a matter as a war of extinction of two peoples, the Nephites and the Jaredites, on the self same battle site, with the same ‘hill’ marking the axis of military movements. By the Nephites this ‘hill’ was called the ‘Hill Cumorah,’ by the Jaredites the ‘Hill Ramah’; it was that same ‘hill,’ in which the Nephite records were deposited by Mormon and Moroni, and from which Joseph Smith obtained the Book of Mormon, therefore the ‘Mormon Hill,’ of today—since the coming forth of the Book of Mormon—near Palmyra, New York. (B.H. Roberts, Studies of the Book of Mormon, p.277)

“According to the Book of Mormon the Hill Cumorah of the Nephites–the Ramah of the Jaredites–must be regarded as a natural monument overlooking ancient and extensive battle fields. Around it early in the sixth century B.C., the Jaredites were destroyed. Here, also, a thousand years later, at the dose of the fourth century A. D., the Nephites met with practical annihilation in a battle which, whether judged by the importance of the changes it wrought in the affairs of one of the world’s continents, or the number slain,a ranks as one of the world’s great battles. In view of these Book of Mormon facts one would naturally expect to find some evidences in this section of the country for such wonderful historical events. Here one has a right to expect the evidences of military fortifications; for, though a thousand years had elapsed between the destruction of the Nephites and the discovery of America by the Europeans, still some military monuments would doubtless survive that length of time.” (B.H. Roberts, New Witnesses for God, Vol.3, Ch.34, p.67)

“One of the most noted places in ancient American history was the land in which was situated the hill known to the Jaredites as Ramah and to the Nephites as Cumorah. In its vicinity two great races were exterminated; for it was there that the last battles were fought in the history of both peoples. There also the sacred records of the Nephites found their final resting place.” (Elder George Reynolds, The Story of the Book of Mormon, Ch.69, p.325)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Office of the First Presidency
Salt Lake City, Utah 84150

October 16, 1990

Bishop Darrel L. Brooks
Moore Ward
Oklahoma City Oklahoma South Stake
1000 Windemere
Moore, OK 73160

Dear Bishop Brooks:

I have been asked to forward to you for acknowledgment and handling the enclosed copy of a letter to President Gordon B. Hinckley from Ronnie Sparks of your ward. Brother Sparks inquired about the location of the Hill Cumorah mentioned in the Book of Mormon, where the last battle between the Nephites and Lamanites took place.

The Church has long maintained, as attested to by references in the writings of General Authorities, that the Hill Cumorah in western New York state is the same as referenced in the Book of Mormon.

The Brethren appreciate your assistance in responding to this inquiry, and asked that you convey to Brother Sparks their commendation for his gospel study.

Sincerely yours,
(signed)
F. Michael Watson
Secretary to the First Presidency
 
My position is that creating a book like the BOM is no small feat.

It is when you can use large chunks of the Bible and the works of other people

The author of such a book has a consistent geography

lol…have you even read it? I have. Several times…in two different languages. The fact is it all fiction makes it easy to do. And the fact you have no idea where it took place is proof it is fiction.

and … in mind. I suggest that had Joseph Smith been the author he would not have vacillated to and fro concerning the content of the book and how it connected to reality.

Why not?

The Spaulding theory has gains a lot of adherents since it was largely abandoned a few decades ago. “Manuscript Found” was published and that seemed to change no critics’ minds about the lack of divine origins for the BOM, but it changed most minds about the source of the fraud.

Which critics? Can we have some citations, please?

One of my biggest problems with the Spaulding theory is the magnitude of the cover up. I already find the witnesses quite compelling

what makes it compelling? They did not write the affidavits. The signatures are not theirs…

and their commitment to the BOM regardless of their association with Joseph. The commitment to the fraud of those responsible for bringing the Spaulding manuscript to light through Joseph adds to the difficulties here.

So, when Martin Harris said they only saw the plates with their “spiritual eyes”, he was lying?

I am assuming the posters above are embracing a form of the Spaulding theory.

I do not think Joseph net-net gained much that would be valuable to an 1830’s man committed to God. The sex was not frequent, the lifestyle was seldom extravagant, the persecution was frequently difficult and occasional horrible, and the death was early. Joseph would have been better off staying a treasure hunter. And had he been as brilliant as some critics claimed, even starting in rural NY, surely he would have had better paths available to him.

proof please? Actually, he was a convicted con man who had more success with the lds con than he ever dreamed. But he got to do it all, all the women he wanted, people building him houses…he got to name himself a mayor and a general…he got to have people give him their wives and money. It was an incredible gig.

I do not find an 1830’s man in rural NY who engaged in treasure digging to be a huge character flaw. I also embrace much of Bushman’s thoughts on this that Joseph Smith felt prepared by and chastised for his Treasure digging.

it was against the law. Are you saying it is ok to break the law when you want? Also, he promised he would stop…then kept doing it. You saying it is ok to lie?

I also do not see Joseph Smith as a man with great character flaws in other areas. With Catholics I usually punt and say that if the Papacy can validly pass through a few historical scoundrels we needn’t argue about God’s ability to use the less than perfect.

Seriously? Another Mormon gonna try to compare Popes who do not claim to have conversations with God to a man who makes that claim?

If Joseph brought forth the huge flaw that is Mormonism, that is something to be condemned; but I do not see in his character strong indications that Mormonism is a fraud (sometimes it seems quite clear that those who condemn his character do so because Mormonism is a fraud and he is a conman, but such a conclusion would not be evidence to support such a conclusion).

Charity, TOm
 
Agree. I know a lot of smart people, people much smarter than I. But there a difference between being smart and having wisdom. A lot of smart people that I know are severely lacking in wisdom.

PnP
Exactly. As soon as someone says (as I did in my youth) that (s)he is too smart to be deceived by a cult, that is when (s)he gets deceived. Smart and wise are not the same thing.

Example: My former employer, a brilliant physicist/entrepreneur with an IQ off the charts, has an office full of “healing crystals” and is a disciple of a guy who claims to trans-channel an ancient Sumerian warrior named Lazarus. The Lazarus weekend seminars cost $5,000 a head to attend. He attends them all.

🤷
 
No, I wasn’t being facetious.

What might a Nephite pot look like? It might have a depiction of armored men carrying swords and spears riding on horses and chariots trotting off to battle.

Here is an article with some truly beautiful, faith affirming, early Christian artwork.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dura-Europos_church

Compelling.

The “Naive assumptions” article: Not compelling. At all.

Come home, Tom! :signofcross:
Since the BoM talks about the cross of Christ a lot, I would at least expect Nephite art to depict the cross.

Paul
 
continued:

“Further, the fact that all of his associates from the beginning down have spoken of it as the identical hill where Mormon and Moroni hid the records, must carry some weight. It is difficult for a reasonable person to believe that such men as Oliver Cowdery, Brigham Young, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, David Whitmer, and many others, could speak frequently of the Spot where the Prophet Joseph Smith obtained the plates as the Hill Cumorah, and not be corrected by the Prophet, if that were not the fact. That they did speak of this hill in the days of the Prophet in this definite manner is an established record of history…” (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation , Vol.3, Bookcraft, 1956, p.232-43.)
**
"In the western part of the state of New York near Palmyra is a prominent hill known as the “hill Cumorah.”** On July twenty-fifth of this year, as I stood on the crest of that hill admiring with awe the breathtaking panorama which stretched out before me on every hand, my mind reverted to the events which occurred in that vicinity some twenty-five centuries ago—events which brought to an end the great Jaredite nation .

[Editor’s Note: About 20 short paragraphs later this speaker says the following]

"This second civilization to which I refer, the Nephites , flourished in America between 600 B.C. and A.D. 400. Their civilization came to an end for the same reason, at the same place, and in the same manner as did the Jaredites’" (Talk given by President Marion G. Romney in General Conference, October 4, 1975, Ensign Nov. 1975 pg. 35)

Apostle LeGrand Richards, in A Marvelous Work and a Wonder, chapter 7, also stated that Cumorah is in New York.
**"Both the Nephite and Jaredite civilizations fought their final great wars of extinction at and near the Hill Cumorah (or Ramah as the Jaredites termed it), which hill is located between Palmyra and Manchester in the western part of the State of New York.
**

“Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery and many of the early brethren, who were familiar with all the circumstances attending the coming forth of the Book of Mormon in this dispensation, have left us a pointed testimony as to the identity and location of Cumorah or Ramah.”(Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, page 174-175, Bookcraft 1966)

"This time it will have to do with so important a matter as a war of extinction of two peoples, the Nephites and the Jaredites, on the self same battle site, with the same ‘hill’ marking the axis of military movements. By the Nephites this ‘hill’ was called the ‘Hill Cumorah,’ by the Jaredites the ‘Hill Ramah’; it was that same ‘hill,’ in which the Nephite records were deposited by Mormon and Moroni, and from which Joseph Smith obtained the Book of Mormon, therefore the ‘Mormon Hill,’ of today—since the coming forth of the Book of Mormon—near Palmyra, New York. (B.H. Roberts, Studies of the Book of Mormon, p.277)

“According to the Book of Mormon the Hill Cumorah of the Nephites–the Ramah of the Jaredites–must be regarded as a natural monument overlooking ancient and extensive battle fields. Around it early in the sixth century B.C., the Jaredites were destroyed. Here, also, a thousand years later, at the dose of the fourth century A. D., the Nephites met with practical annihilation in a battle which, whether judged by the importance of the changes it wrought in the affairs of one of the world’s continents, or the number slain,a ranks as one of the world’s great battles. In view of these Book of Mormon facts one would naturally expect to find some evidences in this section of the country for such wonderful historical events. Here one has a right to expect the evidences of military fortifications; for, though a thousand years had elapsed between the destruction of the Nephites and the discovery of America by the Europeans, still some military monuments would doubtless survive that length of time.” (B.H. Roberts, New Witnesses for God, Vol.3, Ch.34, p.67)

“One of the most noted places in ancient American history was the land in which was situated the hill known to the Jaredites as Ramah and to the Nephites as Cumorah. In its vicinity two great races were exterminated; for it was there that the last battles were fought in the history of both peoples. There also the sacred records of the Nephites found their final resting place.” (Elder George Reynolds, The Story of the Book of Mormon, Ch.69, p.325)

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Office of the First Presidency
Salt Lake City, Utah 84150

October 16, 1990

Bishop Darrel L. Brooks
Moore Ward
Oklahoma City Oklahoma South Stake
1000 Windemere
Moore, OK 73160

Dear Bishop Brooks:

I have been asked to forward to you for acknowledgment and handling the enclosed copy of a letter to President Gordon B. Hinckley from Ronnie Sparks of your ward. Brother Sparks inquired about the location of the Hill Cumorah mentioned in the Book of Mormon, where the last battle between the Nephites and Lamanites took place.

The Church has long maintained, as attested to by references in the writings of General Authorities, that the Hill Cumorah in western New York state is the same as referenced in the Book of Mormon.

The Brethren appreciate your assistance in responding to this inquiry, and asked that you convey to Brother Sparks their commendation for his gospel study.

Sincerely yours,
(signed)
F. Michael Watson
Secretary to the First Presidency
You don’t understand. All of those official pronouncements in conference talks, priesthood manuals, relief society manuals, Sunday school manuals, etc. consistently and authoritatively taught for 180 years were all just some guy’s opinion.

We can safely ignore all that stuff since it is no longer faith-promoting.

What is true is not always useful. 😃
 
You don’t understand. All of those official pronouncements in conference talks, priesthood manuals, relief society manuals, Sunday school manuals, etc. consistently and authoritatively taught for 180 years were all just some guy’s opinion.

We can safely ignore all that stuff since it is no longer faith-promoting.

What is true is not always useful. 😃
Yes, that is true. 🙂

What gets me is how somebody today can say they know more or better than their prophets and apostles of yesterday.

I guess it is time for some to start their own religion since they are so knowledgeable. 😉
 
PorknPie, Stephan168, RebeccaJ, lax16, TexanKnight, PaulDupre1
DNA and the BOM (not problematic IMO, but Catholic geocentrism…):
If I understand the position put forth by all 6 of you (hope I didn’t miss any). DNA proves that the genetic ancestors for modern Indians are not primarily (and may not be partially) folks like Lehi, Ismael, and Zoram. There are numerous LDS leaders who have said this is what the BOM claims and is true. In close connection with this is the hemispheric geography model (a strong part of the DNA argument because the DNA argument includes samples from many Indian tribes primarily in the US however) also taught by numerous LDS leaders. So in light of all the quotes offered from LDS leaders I should choose among two options, 1. DNA science be damned I follow the BOM and LDS leaders (at least the ones quoted here. 2. I reject Mormonism because of DNA. Tangentially related to this is the “boundary maintenance” goal that may be what is really happening here. All Catholics (and Protestants) ignorant of this and other issues can safely reject Mormonism because the former Mormons have explained the relevant facts.

My thoughts:
I was already paying attention when Simon Southerton published his book on DNA. I also had been studying thoughts on the BOM and recognized that thoughtful believers pre-DNA had already abandoned the hemispheric geography model AND acknowledge that the BOM spoke of “others.”
On Signature Books website Southerton said:
“In 600 BC there were probably several million American Indians living in the Americas. If a small group of Israelites, say less than thirty, entered such a massive native population, it would be very hard to detect their genes today.”
He like you then went on to demand that all thoughtful LDS must follow the majority, but not totality, of statements by LDS leaders on the hemispheric geography and origins of modern Indians. But DNA was a done issue for me.
So, for me DNA has very little to say about the validity of the BOM and yet Nahom and Teotihuacan do (and a handful of other geographic and archeological HITS). The thoughts I had on the BOM were already such that DNA didn’t matter and Simon’s own words (as a learned by not expert source on DNA) confirm my position (as a less learned and certainly not expert on DNA).

So LDS leaders have not consistently demanded a hemispheric model, but LDS critics choose to dictate to LDS that LDS must believe in the hemispheric model. I feel as compelled to follow the critics as I think you should feel compelled to worship (Latria / Dulia be damned) Mary and be polytheists.

I feel less compelled to follow the critics than I think you SHOULD feel to follow Robert Sungenis and Gerry Matatics into the belief of geocentrism. Sungenis was one of my favorite Catholic apologists when I was really trying to come to grips with the strength of the pro-Catholic position contra the stupid anti-Catholic writings that were easier to find (like Mary worship).

I would suggest that the mental gymnastics to reject the not univocal teachings of LDS leaders on the hemispheric geography models are small leaps and simple thoughts. And the mental gymnastics necessary to reject the uniform teachings of the ECF on the proper interpretation of the Holy Scriptures concerning geocentricism are far more complicated and may in point of fact be an unwarranted departure from Tradition (with a capital faith requiring “T”).

I am not a geocentrist. I have at least one “Catholic” friend who is. I think the case that Catholic must be a geocentrist is at least an order of magnitude (greater than 10 times for you non-science folks) stronger than the case that a LDS must believe in the hemispheric geography model and the genetic ancestors of the Indians being folks from the BOM.

Charity, TOm
 
PorknPie, Stephan168, RebeccaJ, lax16, TexanKnight, PaulDupre1
DNA and the BOM (not problematic IMO, but Catholic geocentrism…):
If I understand the position put forth by all 6 of you (hope I didn’t miss any). DNA proves that the genetic ancestors for modern Indians are not primarily (and may not be partially) folks like Lehi, Ismael, and Zoram. There are numerous LDS leaders who have said this is what the BOM claims and is true. In close connection with this is the hemispheric geography model (a strong part of the DNA argument because the DNA argument includes samples from many Indian tribes primarily in the US however) also taught by numerous LDS leaders. So in light of all the quotes offered from LDS leaders I should choose among two options, 1. DNA science be damned I follow the BOM and LDS leaders (at least the ones quoted here. 2. I reject Mormonism because of DNA. Tangentially related to this is the “boundary maintenance” goal that may be what is really happening here. All Catholics (and Protestants) ignorant of this and other issues can safely reject Mormonism because the former Mormons have explained the relevant facts.

My thoughts:
I was already paying attention when Simon Southerton published his book on DNA. I also had been studying thoughts on the BOM and recognized that thoughtful believers pre-DNA had already abandoned the hemispheric geography model AND acknowledge that the BOM spoke of “others.”
On Signature Books website Southerton said:
“In 600 BC there were probably several million American Indians living in the Americas. If a small group of Israelites, say less than thirty, entered such a massive native population, it would be very hard to detect their genes today.”
He like you then went on to demand that all thoughtful LDS must follow the majority, but not totality, of statements by LDS leaders on the hemispheric geography and origins of modern Indians. But DNA was a done issue for me.
So, for me DNA has very little to say about the validity of the BOM and yet Nahom and Teotihuacan do (and a handful of other geographic and archeological HITS). The thoughts I had on the BOM were already such that DNA didn’t matter and Simon’s own words (as a learned by not expert source on DNA) confirm my position (as a less learned and certainly not expert on DNA).

So LDS leaders have not consistently demanded a hemispheric model, but LDS critics choose to dictate to LDS that LDS must believe in the hemispheric model. I feel as compelled to follow the critics as I think you should feel compelled to worship (Latria / Dulia be damned) Mary and be polytheists.

I feel less compelled to follow the critics than I think you SHOULD feel to follow Robert Sungenis and Gerry Matatics into the belief of geocentrism. Sungenis was one of my favorite Catholic apologists when I was really trying to come to grips with the strength of the pro-Catholic position contra the stupid anti-Catholic writings that were easier to find (like Mary worship).

I would suggest that the mental gymnastics to reject the not univocal teachings of LDS leaders on the hemispheric geography models are small leaps and simple thoughts. And the mental gymnastics necessary to reject the uniform teachings of the ECF on the proper interpretation of the Holy Scriptures concerning geocentricism are far more complicated and may in point of fact be an unwarranted departure from Tradition (with a capital faith requiring “T”).

I am not a geocentrist. I have at least one “Catholic” friend who is. I think the case that Catholic must be a geocentrist is at least an order of magnitude (greater than 10 times for you non-science folks) stronger than the case that a LDS must believe in the hemispheric geography model and the genetic ancestors of the Indians being folks from the BOM.

Charity, TOm
so, are you going to support the excavation of Palmyra?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top