T
TheBigQ
Guest
When I say “help themselves” , I mean to imply … relieve themselves of a certain specific “need” which usually occurs fairly regularly in normal human males … without * , in their case at least, using any sort of “visual aids” and , of course, again in their case, obviously without being in contact with anyone else. That may sound like a bad question but I’m being quite sincere in asking it. I have always wondered about that. Considering the celibacy requirement (which I am not in “disagreement” with , in theory), how can they, considering that they are normal human males , get by?? It is actually believed to be “bad” for a man to not occasionally “help” himself, not only physically bad, but even mentally. You can literally go a bit daft, I have heard it said. Barring literal castration ( urologists can do this today, for a fee of course, and it is said to be a fairly simple and easy to recover from surgery), combined with certain medication(s) which also help lower or completely erase the release of the normal male hormone(s) from the glandular area(s) of the brain from whence it comes, there is no known way to make a human male truly * celibate, even from the so called “solitary vice” ; make him completely “free”, so to speak, of any and all natural “urges” in such directions.
Also, could it be that some of the priests who have so grievously erred in their paths, to put it gently, and unfortunately strayed into the realm of harming others ( the young most frequently), have suffered from a sort of self-imposed “ban” on even this (essentially harmless) “solitary vice” ?? That could account, a long period of mortifying self-repression that is, denying oneself even this simple solitary pleasure, could account for a certain “resurgence” if you will ( of what would have otherwise been perfectly normal naturally “released” fantasies and thoughts) in the form of something much more twisted which ends up manifesting itself in behaviour which we can only call deeply “anti-social”.
Also, could it be that some of the priests who have so grievously erred in their paths, to put it gently, and unfortunately strayed into the realm of harming others ( the young most frequently), have suffered from a sort of self-imposed “ban” on even this (essentially harmless) “solitary vice” ?? That could account, a long period of mortifying self-repression that is, denying oneself even this simple solitary pleasure, could account for a certain “resurgence” if you will ( of what would have otherwise been perfectly normal naturally “released” fantasies and thoughts) in the form of something much more twisted which ends up manifesting itself in behaviour which we can only call deeply “anti-social”.