Z
zz912
Guest
The employer has the right to offer insurance plans they choose to their employees. You have no right to force them to offer benefits that are evil or violate their conscience.The Church, Christie is basically saying, shouldn’t have a vote in his sex life (fair enough, he’s most definitely not alone even among Catholics), but is does that one’s boss should have a say in someone else’s (eg he’s loudly affirmed the Hobby Lobby decision, where the Supreme Court found that an employer should be able to deny contraception coverage based on their religious beliefs).
I see you are taking an antagonistic approach today. What “choice” are we opposing? No one has the right to “choose” to kill an innocent human being.As the anti-choice movement
Could you list out the candidates who have stated this as their platform?swings towards opposition to contraception altogether,
Contraception is not health care. Contraception is about making perfectly functioning organs stop working properly. That’s the opposite of health care.how is it that suddenly it’s a “moderate” position for someone like Christie to effectively say that safe sex is a luxury and that it should only be available to those who can afford it out of pocket rather than as part of normal health care?
And this claim of “safe sex” is a complete lie of the left. Abortion, STD’s, out-of-wedlock births, divorce, cohabitation…all have skyrocketed from the “safe sex” lie.
Citing the research arm of Planned Parenthood for your statistics is laughable. And the explosion of societal problems has been the RESULT of “safe sex” and they are not solved by it.This ridiculous (frankly disgusting) attitude conveniently ignores the problem that everyone suffers when individual women (regardless of their own income level) don’t have the ability to make their own reproductive health care decisions. Unintended pregnancy costs the US public over $12Bn a year (considering publicly-funded births and associated care - ironically, mostly in Republican-leaning states). There’s one contribution to the overall budget deficit that could vanish overnight if contraception was treated as a right rather than a luxury.
Glad we agree, because he’s not. A person who willfully rejects Church teaching is not a faithful Catholic.I’m not saying by the way that it’s ok for Christie to present himself as a good and faithful Catholic and then say “well actually I am except for the contraception thing…”.
This is impossible, and frankly insulting. I refuse to concede the political realm to the immoral and atheistic view, which is what you are proposing.But this is where political and religious beliefs should be kept well apart.
No one is stopping people from having sex. They should accept the consequences of those decisions to have sex, good or bad. And they should listen to the Church when she says that sex is only for marriage. Outside of that, it is harmful.Sex shoudln’t be a have vs have-not issue, which is what people like Christie wants to make it. In reality, it’s a normal part of almost everyone’s life. Being judgemental about it isn’t going to change a thing…