Whether it is in the ruling or not a priest should wear vestments in conformity to the Catholic Church’s tradition and standards.
Agree. While it was probably done with the best of intentions, having circus symbols on the vestments is probably in bad taste.
A priest should wear a vestment that will symbolize God’s majesty and glory, and not a vestment that will please or make people happy or whatever.
Agree.
The clown Mass as they call it is completely invalid and disobedient to the Church’s magisterium.
Disagree. Nowhere in the article does anyone claim to be celebrating the Mass outside the normal rubrics.
The celebration of the Mass is to worship the Lord, and not to please the laity.
True. However, the Church does reflect and incorporate the laity’s cultural surroundings when celebrating the Mass. This is one instance where that may (or it sounds like it has) make a world of difference to the spiritual needs of those attending.
The Church is a house of prayer, and not a house of entertainment.
Again, the article doesn’t say anything about warping the Mass to reflect a circus atmosphere. It’s a Mass for circus entertainers and personnel, for their worship and spiritual needs.
The Church is liturgical and evangelical, and it does not allow any incorporation of non-liturgical and non-ecclesial things to her liturgy nor teachings.
Proper liturgical vestments are for church use only, while clown costumes are for circus and entertainment purposes only.
The Catholic Church does not allow any clown mass nor any other masses that does not follow the ordinary or extraordinary form of the Roman Rite.
Agreed. But then again, the vestments seem to be the only thing that are in question. I don’t think the article gives us enough information to warrant throwing out the entire liturgy based on a picture of silly vestments.
**And as much as I agree with you, that the vestments are in bad taste, it sounds like the circus employees are very much appreciative of the whole endeavor. **