Eve and Original sin

  • Thread starter Thread starter simpleas
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

simpleas

Guest
How could Eve sin if Original sin had not yet be brought into the human nature by Adam. I mean the act of Eve freely and willingly ‘eating from the tree’ before she gives some to Adam who then eats, and only then does Original sin enter the human nature?

Thanks.
 
How could Eve sin if Original sin had not yet be brought into the human nature by Adam. I mean the act of Eve freely and willingly ‘eating from the tree’ before she gives some to Adam who then eats, and only then does Original sin enter the human nature?

Thanks.
The act of eating only represents an inner state of being not fully embracing or oriented towards Eve’s ultimate good: God, alone. She was not yet perfected, and this allowed for an imperfect act -disobedience of God.

1732 As long as freedom has not bound itself definitively to its ultimate good which is God, there is the possibility of choosing between good and evil, and thus of growing in perfection or of failing and sinning. This freedom characterizes properly human acts. It is the basis of praise or blame, merit or reproach.

Adam & Eve instead obviously chose wrongly. Perfection is complete comes only as one is fully, willingly, subjugated to God. The act of OS is differentiated from the state of OS that all humanity inherited. This state, characterized primarily by separation or division from God but also as division within oneself, between oneself and one’s fellow man, and between oneself and creation, was experienced by Adam & Eve as well only once that breech was made, once the actual first sin was committed. They now stood awkwardly apart from truth, reality-from God. Shame entered their world at this time.
 
How could Eve sin if Original sin had not yet be brought into the human nature by Adam. I mean the act of Eve freely and willingly ‘eating from the tree’ before she gives some to Adam who then eats, and only then does Original sin enter the human nature?

Thanks.
Adam and Eve were individual persons; each possessed free will - responsible only for their personal acts
paduard
 
Eve could sin all by herself, it isn’t like original sin made it possible to sin. When Adam sinned, though, he passed it on to all of his descendants since original sin is passed down through fathers, not mothers. If only Eve sinned, then mankind would still be born in innocence.
 
Eve could sin all by herself, it isn’t like original sin made it possible to sin. When Adam sinned, though, he passed it on to all of his descendants since original sin is passed down through fathers, not mothers. If only Eve sinned, then mankind would still be born in innocence.
I’ve never heard of this before, can you elaborate?
 
Eve could sin all by herself, it isn’t like original sin made it possible to sin. When Adam sinned, though, he passed it on to all of his descendants since original sin is passed down through fathers, not mothers. If only Eve sinned, then mankind would still be born in innocence.
There’s no reason to believe this.

Ed
 
Eve could sin all by herself, it isn’t like original sin made it possible to sin. When Adam sinned, though, he passed it on to all of his descendants since original sin is passed down through fathers, not mothers. If only Eve sinned, then mankind would still be born in innocence.
Nuns taught me that if only Eve had sinned humans would not have fallen, but it was because Adam was created first, according to the nuns. They both sinned because they wanted to be like God. To know what he knows.
 
I’ve never heard of this before, can you elaborate?
There’s no reason to believe this.
St. Thomas Aquinas said in his Summa Theologica: “Accordingly the original sin of all men was in Adam indeed, as in its principal cause, according to the words of the Apostle (Romans 5:12): ‘In whom all have sinned’: whereas it is in the bodily semen, as in its instrumental cause, since it is by the active power of the semen that original sin together with human nature is transmitted to the child.”
 
St. Thomas Aquinas said in his Summa Theologica: “Accordingly the original sin of all men was in Adam indeed, as in its principal cause, according to the words of the Apostle (Romans 5:12): ‘In whom all have sinned’: whereas it is in the bodily semen, as in its instrumental cause, since it is by the active power of the semen that original sin together with human nature is transmitted to the child.”
But this is not Church teaching.The Church only goes so far as to teach that OS is transmitted by propagation.
 
If Adam was the one created first and so Original sin comes from him and passed on through generation, what was Eve’s role in the first sin?
Why say there was any original sin committed when the first sin came from Eve, who was the second human. She did not need Adam in order to sin, she chose for herself, that is if she is thought of as a individual, with a soul and mind of her own.

We could say we don’t need baptism to wipe away the O.S, because we still can fall from Grace, just as Eve did when she was tempted.

Thanks.
 
If Adam was the one created first and so Original sin comes from him and passed on through generation, what was Eve’s role in the first sin?
Why say there was any original sin committed when the first sin came from Eve, who was the second human. She did not need Adam in order to sin, she chose for herself, that is if she is thought of as a individual, with a soul and mind of her own.

We could say we don’t need baptism to wipe away the O.S, because we still can fall from Grace, just as Eve did when she was tempted.

Thanks.
We need to have OS wiped away, just as Eve needed it, because we cannot restore the grace lost. She & Adam lost it; we’re born without it; we both need it. But once restored it can always be forfeited again. OS just means this world is born lost, “born dead”, so to speak, in need of being born again or born from above. I think it should be obvious that this world does not possess the innocence that would’ve been part of God’s original design. And any apparent innocence is soon enough compromised, revealing that something’s missing in humankind now from the get-go.
 
Original sin means we are in a worse spot than Adam and Eve were. We lack the original holiness and justice with which they were created, and we have a wounded nature in which our passions are not as easily subject to our will. But they could still disobey. It was just all the more serious that they did.
 
We need to have OS wiped away, just as Eve needed it, because we cannot restore the grace lost. She & Adam lost it; we’re born without it; we both need it. But once restored it can always be forfeited again. OS just means this world is born lost, “born dead”, so to speak, in need of being born again or born from above. I think it should be obvious that this world does not possess the innocence that would’ve been part of God’s original design. And any apparent innocence is soon enough compromised, revealing that something’s missing in humankind now from the get-go.
I’m afraid I am not asking the right question, or not explaining it well.

Original sin comes from Adam, not Eve, because he was created first, Eve somehow contracted this O.S from Adam or she did not. Eve being created in holiness, not yet perfected so could sin or not, did choose sin, yet was not subject to the O.S nature we are when she first sinned.

She sinned without being subject to O.S.
 
I’m afraid I am not asking the right question, or not explaining it well.

Original sin comes from Adam, not Eve, because he was created first, Eve somehow contracted this O.S from Adam or she did not.
I don’t know. But, why should she? She already had the guilt of the personal sin of disobeying God.
Eve being created in holiness, not yet perfected so could sin or not, did choose sin, yet was not subject to the O.S nature we are when she first sinned.
She sinned without being subject to O.S.
As did Adam.
 
I don’t know. But, why should she? She already had the guilt of the person sin of disobeying God.

As did Adam.
Yes.

So why do we say O.S comes from Adam then? Just because he is the first created?
 
Yes.

So why do we say O.S comes from Adam then? Just because he is the first created?
I don’t think it is related to the chronology of Genesis. I believe it is due Adam’s role as the representative of humanity, who alone, if you believe the Genesis account, was given the command not to eat of the tree.
 
I don’t think it is related to the chronology of Genesis. I believe it is due Adam’s role as the representative of humanity, who alone, if you believe the Genesis account, was given the command not to eat of the tree.
Ok thanks. It’s the same answer I have heard before.

Eve knew also the command, but isn’t as responsible because God spoke the command only to Adam according to the Genesis account.
 
All human are born as innocent. Human commit sins by free will.

Human had heritaged something from Eve and Adam but that was not “sin”! God is not injustice to judge human because of the sin which is not commited byself.Human inherited a weak disposition which cause human to be deceived by Satan easily.
 
I’m afraid I am not asking the right question, or not explaining it well.

Original sin comes from Adam, not Eve, because he was created first, Eve somehow contracted this O.S from Adam or she did not. Eve being created in holiness, not yet perfected so could sin or not, did choose sin, yet was not subject to the O.S nature we are when she first sinned.

She sinned without being subject to O.S.
In general Adam & Eve were given justice. But they were asked, like ourselves, to *own *it, by willing it. This is where man’s perfection lies.
 
In general Adam & Eve were given justice. But they were asked, like ourselves, to *own *it, by willing it. This is where man’s perfection lies.
But we aren’t given justice like they were given because we are born in a state of original sin until baptism.
My point is, Eve sinned without Adam. She was able as a fully human female to sin, no need for her husband to sin first or second or any time, she did it by herself.
She sinned where there was no Original sin to begin with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top