Former Milwaukee archbishop loaned Rihanna miter for Met Gala

  • Thread starter Thread starter KMG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

KMG

Guest

What a sacrilege. The miter is a sacred vestment, which in the traditional liturgy has a prayer the bishop recites as it is placed on his head at Pontifical Mass.
 
I don’t understand how this was in any way sanctioned by members of the Catholic church. The outfits were scandalous and revealing in many instances. One man was wearing a golden crown of thorns. One Victoria Secret model was wearing a lowcut dress with images of the Blessed Mother all over it. And Madonna sang “Like a Virgin” dressed like a monk and then had her monk’s robes torn off revealing a scanty white outfit. Outrageous!
How is this acceptable? And why did the Vatican lend some pieces for the exhibit?
It seems as if, in today’s PC world, the only religion that’s okay to bash in public is Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular.
Imagine if there had been a gala with an Islamic theme?!
 
Last edited:
I think Father Z’s site’s post put it best here. “Alas, this whole thing is a mockery.”

Did the cardinal not loan the miter? Great if so. But cracking jokes about sacrilege isn’t appropriate.

 
“Jovial character”, cracking jokes about sacrilege. Okay, now I get it. This remains a scandal. And the Church looks bad. In part, because of the actions of people in the Church.
 
"From silly devotions and sour-faced saints, good Lord, deliver us.”
~St. Teresa of Avila
 
It was a joke, but a bad joke. Catholics everywhere can understandably be disappointed in how Cardinal Dolan and other priests on this podcast reacted to Rihanna’s vulgar display. St. Teresa of Avila’s quote above doesn’t apply here. What Rihanna did was a mockery of what we hold sacred. The miter is a sacred vestment that is worn for the celebration of the Sacred Mysteries, the Holy Mass. The prayer that the bishop says (and yes, it’s an option to say it in the Ordinary Form) is this:
“Place upon my head, O Lord, the miter and helmet of salvation; that I may go forth unhindered against the snares of the ancient foe, and of all my enemies.” (cf. Eph. 6:17)"
Catholic bishops of the Byzantine Rite always recite this prayer when vesting with the miter:
“The Lord has set a crown of precious stones upon your head; you asked Him for life, and he gave you length of days, always, now and for ever and ever.”
Even if we understand that Rihanna was wearing a fake miter, what she was wearing symbolized a sacred vestment, and she sexualized it. This isn’t about being sour-faced. This isn’t about “lightening up”. This is about a line being crossed. And it was. Unfortunately, this line is crossed often. Sometimes it is publicized, other times it is not. This time, it was publicized, and it has deeply hurt Catholics far and wide. It’s disappointing to hear Cardinal Dolan joke around about it. I’ve already talked with other priests and laypersons that are very disappointed in what took place at the Gala, and they are also disappointed with how it was handled by the hierarchy.

Did Rihanna realize the religious significance of wearing a miter? Does she see the miter as “the helmet of salvation”? Or does she see it as a prop? It should go without saying that sacred vestments should not be used as props.
 
Last edited:
I’d love to have dinner with Cardinal Dolan, he seems to a patron of the arts and also have a great sense of humour. 😊

May I also be blessed with having a chuckle when many seem to be losing their minds over a charity event. 🌷
 
A charity event that was blatantly sacrilegious and blasphemous…and everyone a few years ago would have recognized that without question.
 
They are what they are. What happened here was an absolute disgrace, a sacrilege and a blasphemy that mocked Catholicism.
 
“Jovial character”, cracking jokes about sacrilege. Okay, now I get it. This remains a scandal. And the Church looks bad. In part, because of the actions of people in the Church.
I agree with this. The outfits of the men and women who appeared in the fashion show do not trouble me nearly as much as the actions of the Church officials who went along with and supported this mockery of the faith. I expect nothing less of someone like Rihanna, or Sarah Jessica Parker, or whoever. But the complete utter lack of judgment and negligence of the Church officials who approved of this charade is the real scandal here.

From the National Catholic Register:
“We wanted to be involved and those behind it had good intentions,” a Vatican official told the Register. “As the Met is one of the most significant cultural institutions in the world, and our remit is to engage the world, we see it as important.”

But the Vatican was unaware of the Met Gala, and that the evening event would be used by some celebrities to dress up in a way deemed by many to be a sacrilegious mockery of the Church.
Is there anything that the Vatican is aware of these days? Someone left a comment in the Register that said it better than I ever could:
Perhaps it is about time:

a) that the Vatican learned English, began speaking it, and began understanding the culture of the Anglosphere world, rather than imagining everything through an Italian-Spanish-French-Portugeuse-sometimes Polish/German if the Pope is from there lens. The Vatican cannot continue to feign ignorance of a major part of the world.

b) that the Vatican stopped relying on Jesuits for direction.
And Cardinal Dolan definitely does not receive a pass here either; if anything, his actions are worse than those in the Vatican who lent their artifacts for the exhibit. He of all people should know better. Maybe he’s just desperate for the Church to be accepted at the cool kids’ table in New York City, but I know he’s already getting an earful from the Catholic press, and I can only hope he comes to recognizing the error in lending support and approval to such an event. But I’m not holding my breath.

Of course, the ultimate irony in all of this is that the leader of the Catholic Church at the Vatican, Pope Francis, has gone on the record multiple times since the start of his pontificate criticizing priests, bishops, and other clergy who wear old-fashioned vestments associated with the Latin rite for their showy and gaudy characteristics, in his opinion. Then here comes individuals in the Church supporting an event that is the epitome of glitzy, over-the-top fashion trends, charging $30,000 per ticket. And it’s not even for charity. I wonder if Cardinal Dolan would have been so proud to attend if Pope Francis had walked in, in person.
 
Then here comes individuals in the Church supporting an event that is the epitome of glitzy, over-the-top fashion trends, charging $30,000 per ticket. And it’s not even for charity. I wonder if Cardinal Dolan would have been so proud to attend if Pope Francis had walked in, in person.
Pope Francis would probably have said the money spent on the costumes would have been better spent sheltering the homeless or feeding the poor.

It was like watching Marie Antoinette style royals on parade. However, it was undeniably Catholic given some of the stuff the clery used to wear. We have some antique copes hanging with the vestments for the priests and they are not far from some of what was seen on that red carpet.
 
A charity event that was blatantly sacrilegious and blasphemous…and everyone a few years ago would have recognized that without question.
it was not really a charity event. the money went to the costume department at the Met.
 
It was blasphemy what happened at the Gala and the fact that there are Christians who still don’t care about it should cover the answer to a Catholic English reporter who wanted to know why celebs don’t joke about Judaism or Islam.
 
The wealthy have always supported the arts.

That’s how come there is so much renaissance art. Wealthy families like the Medici.

The Church has also throughout the years has sponsored art.

Some were offended at the Sistine chapel featuring nudes. Some were offended at Pope John Paul for having the Sistine chapel by removing the loin cloths put over Michelangelo’s work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top