D
didymus
Guest
This article was mentioned in another forum:
Scholars have translated 26 pages of a crumbling ancient text that purports to tell the story of Jesus’s last days from the perspective of Judas Iscariot, a man reviled for almost 2000 years. Sensationally, the manuscript portrays him not as a villain but as a hero and Christ’s favoured disciple.
Obviously, this is a load if baloney.
But I’m wondering, what if a new gospel were discovered, say a Gospel of St. Bartholomew, and it contained nothing contrary to the four we already have? Would it still have to be rejected because the canon is closed?
Code:
Gospel of Judas has Church worried
By IAN GALLAGHER
13mar06 THE Gospel of Judas - said to be one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of modern times - is about to be published amid explosive controversy, Britain's The Mail on Sunday newspaper revealed yesterday.
Obviously, this is a load if baloney.
But I’m wondering, what if a new gospel were discovered, say a Gospel of St. Bartholomew, and it contained nothing contrary to the four we already have? Would it still have to be rejected because the canon is closed?