Tinkerbell:
Thanks for the kind words. I have to say my faith has grown stronger through all this. The forum has been a blessing to me. I have several apologetic books but I don’t think he would read them. I might try a small book called “Answer me this”. He has small children and there is not much time to read in the evenings. I was thinking of sending some tapes he could listen to on the way to work in the morning. Any suggestions???
As far what he’s looking for…don’t know. I think some friend has put doubts about Mary, euchrist, priest scandal…you know the usual anti Catholic stuff. I asked him how could you leave the body and blood of Jesus Christ and he said you don’t really believe that c__p do you.
I’m just so frustrated he has fallen for all that garbage. My daughter thinks I’m being silly about this because things could be a whole worse…which is true. God please give me patience.
First, I agree that the first strategy is to remove yourself from the blame loop because that is entirely irrelevant, and honestly DO NOT WORRY about what may happen. One outcome is certainly preferable to another, but the “worry” process itself drains you of energy and creativity, and yes even empathy for his situation.
That means that you surrender that the Holy Spirit is now his primary guide in these areas, as he is of age. Doesn’t mean you give up, as you work through the Spirit also. It just means you absolve yourself in advance for whatever may or may not happen.
It is so terrible when young people use our own measuring sticks against us. He cannot envision what is not seen about the sacraments because he has seen things that aren’t right on the outside of the Church.
We teach children to judge others by their outward behavior as a first cut, and only then if they pass they one may cautiously approach nearer. In this case the Church herself has obvious flaws on the outside, and how can one expect a child to walk past that into the inside and learn the secrets unless they abandon the system we have given them for judging anything else. To me, it is no more or less difficult to look at a person who has objectively done sinful actis and see Christ in that person, as it is to look at the Church whose officials have done objectively sinful acts and still see Christ in the sacraments.
Basically, we either have to “undo” the programming we teach kids to judge each other (very difficult) and every other institution on the planet other than the Church, or show them that somehow with the Church it is different.
I’m not sure I’m clear on my point yet. We would not let a child go stay at a friend’s house if we so much as knew of unanswered allegations that some children had been abused in that house. I think children have a perfect right to demand why the standard should be different for a house of worship – where supposedly what happens that is invisible is perfect and overrides anything that is visible but done wrong. (When there is corruption evident on the surface how does one know what is inside?) When viewed from this perspective, I think a young person has a perfect right to hold our feet to the fire for giving them defective value systems. I say “we” as in the whole society, led by parents but influenced by all others. We tell them to stay away from people who might do bad things when those people offer us candy – then they grow up and we say to accept the Eucharist from people who are in groups of men whose members – even if only a few – are known to have done bad things.
I’m not saying these things to argue on behalf of the wayward child, just to emphasize how deeply rooted I think the problem is and how all of our notions of judging factors in to make it more difficult. With this in mind, perhaps you can empathize with his position better and that in itself may help you help him see what is right.
Alan