Invalid Marriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bene86
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Bene86

Guest
This might sound really wierd but I am taking a Theology course here in Steubie U. and a certain topic has been a recurring theme in my reading material, (immorality of certain reproductive technologies), and I am curious about a certain point.

I understand the reasons why a marriage would be invalid if one of the persons was impotent. There would be no way for them to procreate and give to each other fully themselves. But could it be possible for two people to get married with the understanding of remaining celibate, in a Mary and Joseph manner. What kind of marriage, if it existed, would this be called? It seems sad that two people could fall in love and yet not be married because of a biological problem.

God bless,
Bene
 
Stubie U., that’s cute. I’ll have to ask my RCIA instructor about that name for Franciscan U.

I understand why the marriage of an (name removed by moderator)otent person would be invalid, but I don’ know that I agree with it. The focus seems to be more of a physical act than what is in a person’s heart. That seems contradictory to my concept of God’s teaching.

I realize I’ve just repeated your question. I’ll be waiting with you for a satisfactory answer (if I find one).
 
40.png
Bene86:
But could it be possible for two people to get married with the understanding of remaining celibate, in a Mary and Joseph manner. What kind of marriage, if it existed, would this be called?
It is called a Josephite marriage. From the old Catholic Encylopedia at New Advent:
The agreement to abstain from the use of conjugal rights is, however, quite different, and does not nullify the marriage contract. The parties to the marriage fully consent to transfer to each other the conjugal rights, but, by agreement or vow, oblige themselves to abstain from the actual use of those rights. Now, if, contrary to their agreement or vow, either party should demand the actual use of his or her right, it would not be fornication, though a breach of promise or vow. Such a condition, though possible, is not frequent nor even permissible except in cases of rare virtue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top