I am in RCIA. I used to order Jack Chick tracts. I mostly ordered his “This Was Your Life” tract to hand out. But I read all his other tracts, including the anti-Catholic ones.
Earlier this year, I was struggling with the topic of the Holy Eucharist. When I concluded that Jack Chick was wrong, it was a very big step towards my becoming Catholic. Without Jack Chick’s writing, I might not have “come home”.
My Personal Articles of Faith
I am not an educated theologian. I never attended a class at a seminary. I am not a Bible Scholar. In writing these personal articles of faith, I cannot fully rely on sectarian interpretations of Bible passages that seem to some degree to be ambiguous because they are disagreed upon by such men as St. Augustine, Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Bunyan, John Wesley, D. L. Moody, Billy Sunday, Billy Graham or other significant Christians. I must rely on God’s mercy when it comes to deciding controversial topics - because I can easily be wrong. In writing these articles, I can only count on Bible scriptures that are plain and not controversial. And I decide to count on external evidence such as how I see other people live their lives. The scriptural backing for my method of determination is Matthew 7:15-20. The context of Matthew 7:15-20 is set up in Matthew 7:13-14. I’m paraphrasing: The correct way that leads to life is narrow. Those who find it are few. There are many false prophets. And how can I determine the right way if I am lost. If I am a lost sheep, how can I find the Good Shepherd?
1) Eucharist. Jack Chick says the wafer god is an idol and calls Roman Catholics are idolaters (that I.H.S. stands for Egyptian gods Isis, Horus and Seb). John Wesley’s Articles of Faith (article 18) says transubstantiation is “repugnant to the plain words of Scripture”. Yet to me the plain words of scripture do not seem to refute transubstantiation plainly enough. John 6:53-58 has Jesus teaching to eat his body and drink his blood. The ancient Egyptians did not have our current alphabet. I recall seeing the letters I.H.S. on the alter and on a cross when I was a Methodist. An English non-Catholic website explains I.H.S. “They are sometimes explained as the initial letters of Jesus Hominum Salvator, i.e., Jesus Saviour of Men; or as In Hac Salus, i.e., In this (Cross) is Salvation.” … and that "I.H.S. on a headstone signifies that the person buried below is asleep ‘In Jesus.’ " When I recently returned to the church of my childhood, the Methodist Minister celebrated communion and included a prayer of consecration “May these become for us the body of Christ”. I am convinced that there are presently some Methodist church members (at least in my home Church) who do not know their bread and grape juice are only symbolic.
An honest examination of peoples’ lives to make a Matthew chapter 7 determination must be from first-hand information. It cannot be an examination of bad or mediocre people, because bad or mediocre people are everywhere and in every denomination. Instead, the best examination is of the best people who thoroughly follow their Church’s teachings. People who are known to firmly believe the doctrine in question (Holy Eucharist). If the Roman Catholics are correct, Protestants are “separated brethren” and they have some of the truth. If Jack Chick is correct, Roman Catholics are idolaters and a logical conclusion would be that the very best of them cannot bear good fruit.
Fulton Sheen. The Roman Catholic Archbishop Fulton Sheen’s lifelong faithfulness had a very specific focus. Fulton J. Sheen promised God he would make a Holy Hour of Prayer before Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament everyday of his life. As I read Archbishop Sheen’s words, I know he has a very deep understanding of God’s word. One of Archbishop Sheen’s faults was that he would take unusual means (newspapers, TV) go to very great lengths to reach others for Christ. As a young New Yorker, I knew he had a column in our newspaper (much the same as Billy Graham). Recently, I have been reading the transcripts of Archbishop Sheen’s telecasts and they have been very helpful. I just finished reading his autobiography “Treasure in Clay”. I cannot see Archbishop Sheen as an idol worshipper. How could Archbishop Sheen’s teachings be so good if at the center core of his being and his faithfulness he was wrong? Read the following Internet content:
catholic.net/RCC/Periodicals/Dossier/0910-96/classic.html Note especially “Most remarkable of all was the effect the preaching of the Holy Hour had on non-Catholic ministers.” Including Reverend Jack McAllister, Director of the World Literature Crusade.
CONTINUING