I don’t think there is anything wrong with calling for a ban on all nuclear weapons, which would most likely lead to people not living in the fear of nuclear war. I don’t think there is anything wrong with calling for a ban on Weapons of Mass destruction, which might lead to people not living in fears of a world war. John Paul 2 pushed for the lessening of nuclear stockpiles but also said men had to be converted for it to work.
In my opinion, the statement is purposely ambiguous, so as to get people to debate the issue. Our world is obsessed with weapons. Obsessed with having larger armies. Obsessed with which country has the biggest air force and the biggest navies. Why are people so bothered when Pope Francis puts out a message that is a challenge. He is challenging us to find ways to peace and in a world that is obsessed with weapons, I don’t see a problem with challenging people.
Pope Francis is surrounded by armed swiss guards. When he visits a country, he is surrounded by armed security, snipers etc etc. He knows he needs security like that which is another reason I think he tweeted what he did to stir a debate.
Popes are allowed to hold personal opinions and even tweet about them . He wasn’t speaking ex cathedra.
Are there weapons in Heaven? Of course not. If we are trying to live our lives on earth like we are suppose to live in heaven…why not start now?
I realize that weapons being banned is most likely not possible this side of heaven and because man is fallen, a total weapons ban wouldn’t work. I still think debating issues like these are always good.