Should Lutherans and Catholics "Engage Together in Catechesis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EvangelCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Certainly not; Lutheran and Roman differences clearly remain church-dividing. But learning what the ‘other side’ believes from those very believers, rather than from 500-year-old polemics, seems obviously preferential. I think that’s the message here. We can come together where we can. For example, Roman Catholics can teach Lutherans a little bit about appreciating the saints who have gone before us, and we Lutherans can teach them a thing or thirty about how to sing. 😃
Based on the recommendation of another poster here at CAF, I ordered the “Catholicism” DVD set and our family has started watching it. After completing the first 4 segments I approached my Pastor and Deacon to discuss it, and both are now planning to watch it as well. The biggest reason to do so is to better understand the Catholic church and the shared history of Christianity sans those “500-year-old polemics.”

I plan to donate this set to our church library after our family has watched it - especially approaching the 500th anniversary of our separation, it seems fitting to look at “the other side of the story.”
 
I have read that a Lutheran Ordinariate had been tentatively discussed in the last 3 years. It might happen, but only if requested by Lutheran individuals, or former Lutherans who converted to Catholic. The difference between the Anglican experience and Lutherans is that Anglicans had nothing like the LCMS, a strong, orthodox, permanent structure with a long history and national coverage (along with international partners). The Anglican alternatives - the Continuum, ACNA, perhaps others) are orthodox but still very fragile, quite new. If the Anglicans had a strong option like the LCMS, there would have been less demand for the Ordinariate.
I think you’ve more or less correctly described the basics of the Anglican situation, but the Lutheran situation is more nuanced. I don’t know of a single Lutheran who would take part in a Lutheran Ordinariate (not saying such people don’t exist, of course) unless it was exempt from having to subscribe to Universal Immediate Jurisdiction, the Immaculate Conception of Mary, Transubstantiation, and other dogmas peculiar to the RCC - in other words, those Lutherans would be better off becoming Roman Catholic than clinging to an empty Lutheran identity.
Apart from the orthodoxy issue, are there features - Lutheran “patrimony” so to speak - specific to ELCA’s Lutheran heritage, that are not part of LCMS’ heritage? For instance, would there be any orthodox individuals in ELCA, who would look at the LCMS and say I agree with their strong doctrine, but I would never be comfortable with their style of worship, or LCMS-specific something else?
Not so much; Confessional Lutheranism is Confessional Lutheranism. The Divine Service is recognizable to every Lutheran whether they come from a German or Scandinavian background. A good 90% of the time, a Confessional Lutheran remains in the ELCA with the desperate and noble goal of righting the ship. There are several ELCA pastors who have posted -carefully- on these boards regarding this very topic. They can be found and PM’ed. Their situation, due to their leadership, is precarious. They require our prayers.

A Confessional ELCAer might be concerned about the ‘Church Growth’ movement - but so are Confessional LCMSers and that movement has infiltrated the ELCA, too. 🤷 (For those unfamiliar, ‘Church Growth’ is a group that, while confessing solid doctrine, sometimes inadvertently de-emphasizes it by adopting “Contemporary Worship” styles and “Missional Programs” from American Evangelical movements in an effort to attract youth.)
To return to the OP, is there any ongoing reunification talks between ELCA and LCMS, or efforts to expand cooperative efforts in catechesis, social ministry, between those 2 church bodies? It seems like the small bridges should be built before consideration of much longer bridges.
No. The swim from St. Louis to Rome is shorter than the distance between St. Louis and Chicago. See below:
The LCMS and ELCA will never reunify. There’s way too many theological, moral and social differences to really consider it at this point. They’re almost two completely different denominations.
:sad_yes: Agreed. The LCMS (and other Confessional Lutherans) are closer to the RCC than to the ELCA, particularly on moral issues. The RCC and the LCMS are also moving closer to convergence on doctrinal issues. The ELCA, on the other hand, continues to wade deeper and deeper into the murky waters of relativism and pluralism - dialogue with a sinking target is impossible. That’s not a judgement on the many good Lutherans who remain in the ELCA, it’s simply an admission that the ELCA as a whole is not an orthodox Lutheran body, as Confessional Lutheran Synods have noted: LCMS, LOC, WELS, just Google for more.

I want to emphasize that Confessional Lutheranism is not confined to, nor perfectly expressed in any one Synod. In fact, this is the precise reason Confessional Lutheran bodies often do not share full pulpit and altar fellowship. In a way, it’s each Synod’s “job” to keep the others in check. Small (but important) issues keep the Synods apart, but Confessional Lutherans still recognize each other as Lutheran. So the Synods meet occasionally and irregularly to admonish one another and call each other to repentance. Seminaries are often shared, ordinations and Sacraments are considered valid and respect is afforded.

This is how I can be 99% certain that a Lutheran from the LCMS, WELS, EECMY, ELS, CLC, LMS-USA, LCS, LCC, AALC or any of the other member Synods of the International Lutheran Council or the Confessional Evangelical Lutheran Conference is an orthodox Lutheran.
 
Based on the recommendation of another poster here at CAF, I ordered the “Catholicism” DVD set and our family has started watching it. After completing the first 4 segments I approached my Pastor and Deacon to discuss it, and both are now planning to watch it as well. The biggest reason to do so is to better understand the Catholic church and the shared history of Christianity sans those “500-year-old polemics.”

I plan to donate this set to our church library after our family has watched it - especially approaching the 500th anniversary of our separation, it seems fitting to look at “the other side of the story.”
👍 What a wonderful way to not only build your understanding of Roman Catholicism, but also gain greater appreciation for your own Lutheran faith.

I’m going to ask our pastor about doing more Roman Catholic/Lutheran comparative bible studies. I’d like to be a bit more knowledgeable before my wife and I visit Germany in 2017.
 
No. I think an Ordinariate for interested Lutherans would be better, though.
If you’re thinking of the US particularly, then I don’t see that happening, for the reasons commenter gave … But it could very well happen somewhere (I don’t know where).

But having said that, I think the ordinariates are very much misunderstood: people see them as an attempt to get Anglicans (or Lutherans) to convert, rather than as a reasonable accommodation for those who, of their own volition, want to convert.
 
If you’re thinking of the US particularly, then I don’t see that happening, for the reasons commenter gave … But it could very well happen somewhere (I don’t know where).

But having said that, I think the ordinariates are very much misunderstood: people see them as an attempt to get Anglicans (or Lutherans) to convert, rather than as a reasonable accommodation for those who, of their own volition, want to convert.
I don’t see why an Ordinariate would even be necessary. Lutherans who want to convert should just go through and joined the RC.

I don’t see there being enough difference litugically between Catholics and Evangelical Catholics to warrant a separate Ordinariate with Evangelical Catholic Patrimony.

Also, I agree with you, I don’t know any Lutheran that would take up the Roman Catholic Church on such an offer. Confessional Lutherans aren’t on the same page theologically. Non Confessional Lutherans are not on the same page ethically.
 
I don’t see why an Ordinariate would even be necessary. Lutherans who want to convert should just go through and joined the RC.
Good post. However, not wanting to get into a big discussion of ordinariates, I’ll limit my response to one particular: the provision for married Anglican (or potentially Lutheran) ministers to become married Catholic priests. I see this as a very necessary accommodation to make for Episcopal ministers who cannot in good conscience stay where they are – not, mind you, as a way to incentivize conversion to RCism or an attempt to capitalize on the liberalization of the EC-USA (and CoE and Anglican Church of Canada).
 
Good post. However, not wanting to get into a big discussion of ordinariates, I’ll limit my response to one particular: the provision for married Anglican (or potentially Lutheran) ministers to become married Catholic priests. I see this as a very necessary accommodation to make for Episcopal ministers who cannot in good conscience stay where they are – not, mind you, as a way to incentivize conversion to RCism or an attempt to capitalize on the liberalization of the EC-USA (and CoE and Anglican Church of Canada).
From what I’ve seen in popular circles, it seems that the majority of Lutherans who have converted to Catholicism in the US are from the ELCA, as opposed to WELS or LCMS. Fr. Neuhaus being a notable exception. The confessional Lutherans who have left seem to go to Orthodoxy (I’m not sure the particular reason for this, other than perhaps that they are too opposed to the papacy). Given the state of the ELCA and the Anglican communion, I wouldn’t blame Rome one iota for incentivizing conversion. I’d encourage such a move (other than telling them to join confessional Lutheran bodies).
 
From what I’ve seen in popular circles, it seems that the majority of Lutherans who have converted to Catholicism in the US are from the ELCA, as opposed to WELS or LCMS. Fr. Neuhaus being a notable exception. The confessional Lutherans who have left seem to go to Orthodoxy (I’m not sure the particular reason for this, other than perhaps that they are too opposed to the papacy). Given the state of the ELCA and the Anglican communion, I wouldn’t blame Rome one iota for incentivizing conversion. I’d encourage such a move (other than telling them to join confessional Lutheran bodies).
I realize that in some circles it isn’t “politically correct” to “incentivize” conversion to the Catholic Church. Heaven forbid we should actually encourage people to join us!! :eek: :eek: Isn’t that what the Apostles set out to do?? Yeah, yeah…I know…they were sent to convert Jews and pagan Gentiles. So what? But if we (Catholics) truly believe that the Catholic Church is THE Church, why on earth would we not want and encourage others, even those who call themselves “Christian”, to join us?
 
From what I’ve seen in popular circles, it seems that the majority of Lutherans who have converted to Catholicism in the US are from the ELCA, as opposed to WELS or LCMS. Fr. Neuhaus being a notable exception. The confessional Lutherans who have left seem to go to Orthodoxy (I’m not sure the particular reason for this, other than perhaps that they are too opposed to the papacy). Given the state of the ELCA and the Anglican communion, I wouldn’t blame Rome one iota for incentivizing conversion. I’d encourage such a move (other than telling them to join confessional Lutheran bodies).
:sad_yes: Agreed. Many would be better served in Word and Sacrament in the RCC or Orthodoxy.
 
Alright, Per Crucem, what would it take?*** (But please keep in mind that I’m not a very wealthy man.)***
Hope you’re not implying that “conversion” can be purchased with money! :eek: :eek: 😃
 
Alright, Per Crucem, what would it take? (But please keep in mind that I’m not a very wealthy man.)
In the spirit of the Reformation, “Whenever a large check is sent to my home, this Lutheran gives up protesting and joins Rome.” 😃
 
Alright, Per Crucem, what would it take? (But please keep in mind that I’m not a very wealthy man.)
In the spirit of the Reformation, “Whenever a large check is sent to my home, this Lutheran gives up protesting and joins Rome.” 😃
Love it. 😃

But in all seriousness, you see my point with respect to your wanting us to “incentivize” Lutheran-to-Catholic conversion?
 
Love it. 😃

But in all seriousness, you see my point with respect to your wanting us to “incentivize” Lutheran-to-Catholic conversion?
Yes. But that is because we were discussing the ELCA. If we’re discussing a theological liberal, it wouldn’t be a Lutheran to Catholic conversion. In those cases it would be from non-Christianity to Christianity.
 
Yes. But that is because we were discussing the ELCA. If we’re discussing a theological liberal, it wouldn’t be a Lutheran to Catholic conversion. In those cases it would be from non-Christianity to Christianity.
:confused::confused:

Please forgive my over-abundant ignorance…This comment seems to imply that there are Lutherans who are not Christians, and that some Lutherans are really Catholics. Huh? Or, am I missing something here?
 
:confused::confused:

Please forgive my over-abundant ignorance…This comment seems to imply that there are Lutherans who are not Christians, and that some Lutherans are really Catholics. Huh? Or, am I missing something here?
It would be that the ELCA…that is, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, is not a Lutheran church body. It is, in name only. There are, of course, Christians present within it.

However, I would be referencing the institution and hierarchy thereof. It has separated itself so completely from apostolic faith, both in doctrine and practice, that it can no longer be reasonably called a church at all. It is in fellowship with other churches who have left Christianity behind as well. Therefore, if an ELCA member leaves that body and becomes Catholic, they are leaving a non-Christian institution and joining a Christian one (Catholicism).
 
It would be that the ELCA…that is, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, is not a Lutheran church body. It is, in name only. There are, of course, Christians present within it.

However, I would be referencing the institution and hierarchy thereof. It has separated itself so completely from apostolic faith, both in doctrine and practice, that it can no longer be reasonably called a church at all. It is in fellowship with other churches who have left Christianity behind as well. Therefore, if an ELCA member leaves that body and becomes Catholic, they are leaving a non-Christian institution and joining a Christian one (Catholicism).
Okay, thanks! 🙂
 
Yes. But that is because we were discussing the ELCA. If we’re discussing a theological liberal, it wouldn’t be a Lutheran to Catholic conversion. In those cases it would be from non-Christianity to Christianity.
It would be that the ELCA…that is, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, is not a Lutheran church body. It is, in name only. There are, of course, Christians present within it.

However, I would be referencing the institution and hierarchy thereof. It has separated itself so completely from apostolic faith, both in doctrine and practice, that it can no longer be reasonably called a church at all. It is in fellowship with other churches who have left Christianity behind as well. Therefore, if an ELCA member leaves that body and becomes Catholic, they are leaving a non-Christian institution and joining a Christian one (Catholicism).
I am not (nor have I ever been) a Lutheran, so I’ll mostly leave this side of the conversation to others; but fwiw I don’t think that your explanation entirely explains your original ELCA-statement. (Although I appreciate the fact that you regard your denomination as being closer to Rome than to the ELCA.:))

Anyhow, it’s pretty far afield from my original point, that ordinariates aren’t a way to “incentivize” conversion to Catholicism.
 
I am not (nor have I ever been) a Lutheran, so I’ll mostly leave this side of the conversation to others; but fwiw I don’t think that your explanation entirely explains your original ELCA-statement. (Although I appreciate the fact that you regard your denomination as being closer to Rome than to the ELCA.:))
Sure, it would be a side conversation as you’re not Lutheran. I am curious, though, how you don’t think it explains it?
 
Some thoughts:

This thread is about the international Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue that most recently produced the document, ’From Conflict to Communion”. Studying these 50 years of in-depth discussion between Lutheran and Catholic theologians and bishops from the United States, the conclusions have been both astonishing and quite promising.

Coinciding with the Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue, various Lutheran jurisdictions in Europe and north America, have enacted Church polity related to gender and human sexuality; namely female priests/ bishops and recognition of loving homosexual relationships.

It is quite noteworthy that the Roman Catholic Church, in spite of opposition to woman clergy and homosexual marriage, never ceased in maintaining close ties with Lutherans such as the Church of Sweden and the ELCA. In-fact, the partners throughout these 50+ years of sharing and rejoicing in convergence of doctrine have been primarily these very Synods/ state churches of Lutheranism and the Vatican.

Why would the Roman Catholic Church continue the effort and then produce a document urging that these Lutherans could take holy Communion at a Catholic Mass and, in-fact, proposing unification of Lutherans and Catholics?

Some Lutherans on this forum would suggest that the Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue is not valid and point out that the Missouri Synod is starting a new dialogue with Rome even though the LCMS is not even allowed to pray with Roman Catholics. Those deep theological sessions of “confessional” Lutherans and Catholics can not even start with prayer!

The Roman Catholic Church, per this thread’s document, is urging Lutheran pastors and bishops to go on retreat together and for laity to study the Catholic faith together. The Lutherans identified in the Lutheran-Catholic Dialogue are the ELCA not the LCMS. Why is that when considering the ELCA’s practice of ordaining women and allowing gay pastors?

One Lutheran poster from a North American diocese of a total of 16 parishes, claims that nearly all other Lutherans are not even Christian! A seemingly sad irony of a self-proclaimed Christian on CAF in conflict with Pope Francis who states:

“Religion has the right to express its opinion in the service of the people,” Francis told Jesuit Roman journal La Civilta Cattolica in an interview published Thursday and previewed by CNN. “But God in creation set us free: it is not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person.”
nytimes.com/2013/09/20/world/europe/pope-bluntly-faults-churchs-focus-on-gays-and-abortion.html?_r=0
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top