L
leonie
Guest
ad2000.com.au/articles/2002/sep2002p8_1115.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e16e/6e16ef8e11be3032b3355d558fcfe3bfc779b619" alt="Frowning face with open mouth :frowning: 😦"
If both father and mother attended church regularly then 33 per cent of their children became regular churchgoers, a further 41 per cent irregular attenders and about a quarter not practising at all.
- If the mother was a regular church attender but the father irregular then only 3 per cent of their children became regular church attenders, 59 per cent irregular attenders and 38 per cent non-attenders.
- If the father was non-practising and the mother regular only 2 per cent of children were regular and 37 per cent irregular church attenders. 61 per cent did not attend church at all.
- Surprisingly, if the father is a regular church attender the children’s religious practice varied in an inverse relationship to their mothers’ practice. If the mother was regular 33 per cent of children were regular. If she was an irregular attender then 38 per cent of children were regular. If the mother was non-practising then 44 per cent of children became regular attenders.
- Even when the father is an irregular attender and the mother non- practising 25 per cent of the children were regular attenders and 23 per cent irregular attenders.
So, because when I was 22 and an uncatechized Catholic, I married a wonderful but not religious man, my kids have all the odds stacked against them.In summary, if a father does not go to church, no matter how regular the mother is in her religious practice, only one child in 50 becomes a regular church attender. But if a father attends regularly then regardless of the practice of the mother at least one child in three will become a regular church attender.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e16e/6e16ef8e11be3032b3355d558fcfe3bfc779b619" alt="Frowning face with open mouth :frowning: 😦"