Split! MyFavoriteMartin's "One True Church" Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter myfavoritmartin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

myfavoritmartin

Guest
40.png
MrS:
You may start as many churches as there are interpreters
There is one true church…
It is the universal church of believers…

For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. john 3:16

And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
Do you really believe that? :ehh:
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
There is one true church…
It is the universal church of believers…

For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. john 3:16

And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
Peace.

No offense, but which Protestant denomination?

Pentecostal? Baptist? Evangelical? Non-Denominational? Etc. One has to be more “true” than the others, right?

Peace.
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
There is one true church…
It is the universal church of believers…

For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. john 3:16

And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
**either **this is a contradiction since your prerequisite is John 3:16 which on the surface includes even the devil

*…guess we have to include lots of verses… maybe all of Scripture… to be guided correctly IF the interpretations of all the verses [1]do not contradict each other and [2] the interpretations come authoritatively.
so that would leave out ALL of the varied protestant communities.
*

** or** you are just in need of justifying a movement (protestantism) which you use to replace the one (actually only one) began by Jesus

:hmmm: you continue to make life interesting…misguided, but interesting.
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
There is one true church…
It is the **universal church ** of believers…

For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. john 3:16

And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
The Catholic Church is the one true Church. What do you think the word Catholic means: Universal!!

By the way it is not sufficient to only believe in Jesus to be saved. Even Satan believes in Jesus but he will not be saved!
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
There is one true church…
It is the universal church of believers…

For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. john 3:16

And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
This thread could be retitled “My Favorite Marian Belief”

but the martin is trying to divert the topic to “My Favorite Martin Belief”

…bad boy:tsktsk:
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
Could you please identify a time prior to 1500 when “Christ’s true church” taught what you think it should?

Is there anyone in the first 1000 years of Christianity who agree with your position? Who? Please don’t use the NT writers, as that begs the question.

All I’m looking for is a name - just one. Who, in the first 1000+ years of Christian history, believed the Gospel you do? If you cannot produce a name, does that mean that “true Christianity” disappeared from the face of the earth immediately after Christ died until Reformer X “revived” it?

God Bless,
RyanL
 
40.png
thistle:
The Catholic Church is the one true Church. What do you think the word Catholic means: Universal!!
Wouldn’t that make Roman Catholic somewhat of an oxymoron?
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
There is one true church…
It is the universal church of believers…

For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. john 3:16
Are you saying Catholics don’t believe in Jesus Christ?

Do you accept the creed?

**I believe in God, the Father almighty,
creator of heaven and earth.

I believe in Jesus Christ, God’s only Son, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried;
he descended to the dead.
On the third day he rose again from the dead;
he ascended into heaven,
he is seated at the right hand of the Father,
and he will come again to judge the living and the dead.

I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting. AMEN.**
And we protestants are merely trying to guide the Catholics back to Christs true church.
And catholics are merely trying to guide back to the one true church that Christ founded “Those who went out from us but were not one of us”

Peace and God Bless
Nicene
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
Wouldn’t that make Roman Catholic somewhat of an oxymoron?
not if you know the history

We have always been the Catholic Church… King Henry’s attempt to take the name for his church did not work, so he attempted to insult the Catholics by adding Romish, Popish, etc, and after nearly 100 years of this trash talk, the name actually took hold at Roman.

Our allegiance is to Jesus Christ, and the vicar He provides as “the chief steward while the Master is away”.
The authority of Christ and the unbroken line of fallible men succeeding the fallible Peter ("…let his office another take…") is something no one else has. Instead, without proper authority, they/you have the confusion of endless interpretations.
 
40.png
RyanL:
Could you please identify a time prior to 1500 when “Christ’s true church” taught what you think it should?

Is there anyone in the first 1000 years of Christianity who agree with your position? Who? Please don’t use the NT writers, as that begs the question.

All I’m looking for is a name - just one. Who, in the first 1000+ years of Christian history, believed the Gospel you do? If you cannot produce a name, does that mean that “true Christianity” disappeared from the face of the earth immediately after Christ died until Reformer X “revived” it?

God Bless,
RyanL
My one proof is this, Roman Catholics Have no proof of papal authority prior to Emperor Costantine, therefore if you remove any doctrines created on papal authority, viola you have the church of belivers.
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
My one proof is this, Roman Catholics Have no proof of papal authority prior to Emperor Costantine, therefore if you remove any doctrines created on papal authority, viola you have the church of belivers.
LIKE:

Perhaps Peter declaring in Matthew… You are the Son of the Living God…

would you remove that… viola… you are even more removed from the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church

or

just simply say Jesus lied… [1] “…I will be with you ALL days…” [2] “…the gates of hell will not prevail…”
etc etc etc
 
now we have a highjacked thread again

“My other Favorite Martin Belief”…
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
My one proof is this, Roman Catholics Have no proof of papal authority prior to Emperor Costantine
Oh No! Not the Constantine conspiracy theory again! :eek:
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
My one proof is this, Roman Catholics Have no proof of papal authority prior to Emperor Costantine, therefore if you remove any doctrines created on papal authority, viola you have the church of belivers.
You mean proof like this?:

Hermas The Shepherd 2:4:3 (80 A.D.)
Therefore shall you [Hermas] write two little books and send one to Clement [Bishop of Rome] and one to Grapte. Clement shall then send it to the cities abroad, because that is his duty.

Clement Letter to the Corinthians 1, 58-59,63 (97 A.D.)
Owing to the sudden and repeated calamities and misfortunes which have befallen us, we must acknowledge that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the matters in dispute among you, beloved; and especially that abominable and unholy sedition, alien and foreign to the elect of God, which a few rash and self-willed persons have inflamed to such madness that your venerable and illustrious name, worthy to be loved by all men, has been greatly defamed. . . . Accept our counsel and you will have nothing to regret. . . . If anyone disobey the things which have been said by him [God] through us *, let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and in no small danger. . . . You will afford us joy and gladness if being obedient to the things which we have written through the Holy Spirit, you will root out the wicked passion of jealousy.

Ignatius of Antioch Letter to the Romans 3:1 (107-110 A.D)
You [the church at Rome] have envied no one, but others you have taught. I desire only that what you have enjoined in your instructions may remain in force.

Ignatius of Antioch Letter to the Romans 1:1 (107-110 A.D)
Ignatius . . . to the church also which holds the presidency, in the location of the country of the Romans, worthy of God, worthy of honor, worthy of blessing, worthy of praise, worthy of success, worthy of sanctification, and, because you hold the presidency in love, named after Christ and named after the Father.

Irenaeus: Against Heresies 3, 3, 2 (189 A.D.)
Since, however, it would be very tedious, in such a volume as this, to reckon up the successions of all the Churches, we do put to confusion all those who, in whatever manner, whether by an evil self-pleasing, by vainglory, or by blindness and perverse opinion, assemble in unauthorized meetings; [we do this, I say,] by indicating that tradition derived from the apostles, of the very great, the very ancient, and universally known Church founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul;

Dionysius of Corinth Letter to Pope Soter in Eusebius Church History 4:23:9 (170 A.D)
For from the beginning it has been your custom to do good to all the brethren in various ways and to send contributions to all the churches in every city. . . . This custom your blessed Bishop Soter has not only preserved, but is augmenting, by furnishing an abundance of supplies to the saints and by urging with consoling words, as a loving father his children, the brethren who are journeying.

Eusebius of Caesarea Church History 4:22 - Hegesippus, Memoirs (180 A.D)
And the churchIll of Corinth continued in the true faith until Primus was bishop in Corinth. I conversed with them on my way to Rome, and abode with the Corinthians many days, during which we were mutually refreshed in the true doctrine. And when I had come to Rome I remained a there until Anicetus, whose deacon was Eleutherus. And Anicetus was succeeded by Soter, and he by Eleutherus. In every succession, and in every city that is held which is preached by the law and the prophets and the Lord.And the churchIll of Corinth continued in the true faith until Primus was bishop in Corinth. I conversed with them on my way to Rome, and abode with the Corinthians many days, during which we were mutually refreshed in the true doctrine. And when I had come to Rome I remained a there until Anicetus, whose deacon was Eleutherus. And Anicetus was succeeded by Soter, and he by Eleutherus. In every succession, and in every city that is held which is preached by the law and the prophets and the Lord.

And of Course the greatest proof of all:

Jesus Christ (33 A.D)

Simon Peter replied, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God” And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

Peace and God Bless
Nicene*
 
40.png
myfavoritmartin:
My one proof is this, Roman Catholics Have no proof of papal authority prior to Emperor Costantine, therefore if you remove any doctrines created on papal authority, viola you have the church of belivers.
Although others have obviously completely destroyed this “proof” of yours, you still didn’t answer my question.

Can you name anyone prior to 1000 AD who agreed with your interpretation of the Gospel? Just one name? If not, what does that mean about “true Christianity”? Was there a “Great Apostacy”?

God Bless,
RyanL
 
thistle said:

Thistle I would be careful of specify links unless you’ve personally confirmed the information therein. I opened the primacy of peter and the very first thing was this
Matt. to Rev. - Peter is mentioned 155 times and the rest of apostles combined are only mentioned 130 times.
Peter was mentioned 158 times, paul alone was mentioned 157 times…? so no other apostles are mentioned?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top