L
Louemma
Guest
Does the Catholic Faith hold to the doctrine of “The Catching Away,The Rapture?”
No. The Rapture is a novel theological hypothesis (less than 200 years old) and contradicts Catholic teaching on eschatology (the end times).Does the Catholic Faith hold to the doctrine of “The Catching Away,The Rapture?”
There is no scriptural support for “rapture” in the pre-tribulation sense. The only way to get it is to twist the original words and meanings and read in new ideas never before taught by any apostle. The rapture or as you say “catching away” happens AFTER the persecution and AFTER Jesus puts an end to evil and comes to pass final judgement. These still alive (very few) at this small instant in time will be either supernaturally slain by God (mercifully and instantly) and pulled into heaven (fulfilling the formula that all must die to enter heaven) or be granted a special exception since time is literally over when Christ’s comes. But the idea is we all must be removed from our currently corrupt bodies (even those who are evil) and then given perfect non-corrupt bodies that are with us for eternity. So again it is likely even the few surviving the tribulation must die only to be immediately brought into heaven and given a new body soon thereafter. The evil ones of course are cast body AND soul into hell for eternity.Thank You all for the information.
There is scripture supporting the catching away.I will check out the links and information posted here.
For those that do believe the catching away of the bride of Christ is the Rapture.Paul speaks of the Catching Away.Paul also speaks of the restrainer taken out of the way in order for the man of lawlessness to come on the scene.
Who do the Catholics think the beast is in Revelation?Do the Catholics think there will be an Anti-Christ and a tribulation time of trouble such as never before.Jesus spoke of this in Matthew 24,the signs of the end.
Check out this article, Are We Living in the Last Days?, by Carl E. Olson.Does the Catholic Faith hold to the doctrine of “The Catching Away,The Rapture?”
Rapture theology was created in the 19th century by a woman who was a ‘seer’ in a Plymoth Brethren church in England. It was popularized by a preacher named C.I. Schofield in the beginning of the 20th century. Before that period, it was unknown. But it illustrates what happens with the idea of ‘sola scriptura’, various interpretations are taken fact because they are ‘popular’ interpretations. Your other questions appear to stem from Schofield’s theology of ‘dispensationalism’, which again, is a novel interpretation. Even most Reformed Protestants reject it.Thank You all for the information.
There is scripture supporting the catching away.I will check out the links and information posted here.
For those that do believe the catching away of the bride of Christ is the Rapture.Paul speaks of the Catching Away.Paul also speaks of the restrainer taken out of the way in order for the man of lawlessness to come on the scene.
Who do the Catholics think the beast is in Revelation?Do the Catholics think there will be an Anti-Christ and a tribulation time of trouble such as never before.Jesus spoke of this in Matthew 24,the signs of the end.
Well, I guess you’ll have to stay here for the next seven years and be tortured like the rest of us.aw… I was lookin forward to the rapture…:crying:
haha. The silly thing about millaniarism/Darbyism/rapture-escapism is found in realizing that for 99.8% of us the 2nd coming of Christ is statistically going to happen WHEN WE DIE. If people spent 10% of the time they do worring about The End Times (which we have lived in since Christ rose from the dead) and “The Beast” and “The Anti-Christ” on their own souls and their own “end times” (e.g. personal deaths) the entire Christian world would rediscover the virtues of holiness and become strong Catholics.aw… I was lookin forward to the rapture…:crying:
This should not be consider silly.It’s heart breaking.Do you realize that there are the most sincere Christians that are looking for the catching away.Now in Matthew 24 Jesus talks about "two in a field,one taken the other left.What do you suppose Jesus meant by saying some would be taken and some left.haha. The silly thing about millaniarism/Darbyism/rapture-escapism is found in realizing that for 99.8% of us the 2nd coming of Christ is statistically going to happen WHEN WE DIE. If people spent 10% of the time they do worring about The End Times (which we have lived in since Christ rose from the dead) and “The Beast” and “The Anti-Christ” on their own souls and their own “end times” (e.g. personal deaths) the entire Christian world would rediscover the virtues of holiness and become strong Catholics.
James
Hi, Louemma.This should not be consider silly.It’s heart breaking.Do you realize that there are the most sincere Christians that are looking for the catching away.Now in Matthew 24 Jesus talks about "two in a field,one taken the other left.What do you suppose Jesus meant by saying some would be taken and some left.
This subject was not brought up because people spend their time consumed with end times.This subject was brought up because when studying God’s word we shouldn’t pick and choose WHAT WE think is important.The whole word of God needs to be studied and this includes Revelation and the end times.Really if you read God’s word there is no getting around the subject of Christ’s return.Naturally there are many teachings like the rapture that deserves checking into.
To say the whole world must convert to being catholic before the tribulation comes,as the same as the rapture,have you got scripture to validate this claim,of a one world religion?You seem pretty sure with this theory but have you got scripture to back up this claim that all must convert to Catholic before the tribulation comes?
Well Louemma yes it is heartbreaking that so many well meaning people can be so easily mislead by other ostensibly “well meaning” people who have seen fit to invent new non-apostolic teachings that have never ever been taught before in Christ’s Church. History that is open for all to see has no recollection of any Christian every teaching millianiarism or pre-tribulation rapture before the 1800s. So we know it is a new concept and not one that comes to us from apostolic times. This is an error that comes out of private interpretation of scripture that Peter warned us explicitly not to do: 2*** Peter 3:16 He (Paul) writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.***This should not be consider silly.It’s heart breaking.Do you realize that there are the most sincere Christians that are looking for the catching away.Now in Matthew 24 Jesus talks about "two in a field,one taken the other left.What do you suppose Jesus meant by saying some would be taken and some left.
This subject was not brought up because people spend their time consumed with end times.This subject was brought up because when studying God’s word we shouldn’t pick and choose WHAT WE think is important.The whole word of God needs to be studied and this includes Revelation and the end times.Really if you read God’s word there is no getting around the subject of Christ’s return.Naturally there are many teachings like the rapture that deserves checking into.
This is a tangential issue to the main question so I don’t want to spend a lot of time on it. But I will say that I must ask you to show me in scripture where it says “scripture contains all that is ever said about salvation” when we know that scripture itself tells us that it DOES NOT contain all that was ever said about God and salvation. Ref: scripturecatholic.com/scripture_alone.html for dozens of scripture verses that refute the error of sola scriptura and private interpretation.To say the whole world must convert to being catholic before the tribulation comes,as the same as the rapture,have you got scripture to validate this claim,of a one world religion?You seem pretty sure with this theory but have you got scripture to back up this claim that all must convert to Catholic before the tribulation comes?
The lesson from the flood is that except for Noah and his family, the rest of his generation were destroyed by God’s judgment. The righteous will be left, just as his family were spared, and the wicked will be taken, as Noah’s generation was swept away by the flood.This should not be consider silly.It’s heart breaking.Do you realize that there are the most sincere Christians that are looking for the catching away.Now in Matthew 24 Jesus talks about "two in a field,one taken the other left.What do you suppose Jesus meant by saying some would be taken and some left.
Louemma-This should not be consider silly.It’s heart breaking.Do you realize that there are the most sincere Christians that are looking for the catching away.Now in Matthew 24 Jesus talks about "two in a field,one taken the other left.What do you suppose Jesus meant by saying some would be taken and some left.
This subject was not brought up because people spend their time consumed with end times.This subject was brought up because when studying God’s word we shouldn’t pick and choose WHAT WE think is important.The whole word of God needs to be studied and this includes Revelation and the end times.Really if you read God’s word there is no getting around the subject of Christ’s return.Naturally there are many teachings like the rapture that deserves checking into.
To say the whole world must convert to being catholic before the tribulation comes,as the same as the rapture,have you got scripture to validate this claim,of a one world religion?You seem pretty sure with this theory but have you got scripture to back up this claim that all must convert to Catholic before the tribulation comes?
No I did not say Catholic pick and choose scripture.What I said is we can not pick and choose scripture,that the whole word of God needed to be studied on and this would include Revelation and end time.This was in regards to your statement that some are preoccupied by end times.I was merely stating that if we study God’s word,you can’t get around end time events in the Bible.Well Louemma yes it is heartbreaking that so many well meaning people can be so easily mislead by other ostensibly “well meaning” people who have seen fit to invent new non-apostolic teachings that have never ever been taught before in Christ’s Church. History that is open for all to see has no recollection of any Christian every teaching millianiarism or pre-tribulation rapture before the 1800s. So we know it is a new concept and not one that comes to us from apostolic times. This is an error that comes out of private interpretation of scripture that Peter warned us explicitly not to do: 2*** Peter 3:16 He (Paul) writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.***
Catholics do not pick and choose what is important in scripture since ALL of scripture is important. But the tradition of Cafeteria Christianity is also a recent phenomena seen ONLY outside of the Catholic Church. Catholics who do so automatically excommunicate themselves if they ignore core teachings and opt for the things that only appeal to them. If the protestant theory of the bible teaching itself were true then there would be no need for the new Protestant “left behind” books and similar neo-Christian teaching self-study books since there are no new magic formulas or systems and revelations to be had. Christ has come and revealed ALL truth and has given us it all. It is as He said “finished” correct?
I don’t question your sincerity or your motive for bringing up the topic.
Catholics here have given you good references to read and I think these will help you come to realize the true teaching in this topic area. Catholics do believe in studying the entire word of God but also do so in a context of HANDED DOWN apostolic teachings that come directly from the apostles and their disciples. We are NOT free to arrive at contradictory teachings to what was handed down to us over the last 2,000 years and pre-tribulation rapture is NOT handed down to us as a legitimate teaching and is a very very recent innovation in modern times – times when we are told explicitly to be especially watchful of novel and perverse false teachings.
This is a tangential issue to the main question so I don’t want to spend a lot of time on it. But I will say that I must ask you to show me in scripture where it says “scripture contains all that is ever said about salvation” when we know that scripture itself tells us that it DOES NOT contain all that was ever said about God and salvation. Ref: scripturecatholic.com/scripture_alone.html for dozens of scripture verses that refute the error of sola scriptura and private interpretation.
While every bit of Catholic teaching is 100% in agreement with scripture we have assurances that the apostolic teaching must also go hand in hand with scripture to keep Christianity from being hijacked by every Simon Magus or heretical doctrine that was trying to change the truth even during the times of the apostles all the way to current times. Here is the biblical basis for why pre-trib and millanarism rapture is WRONG: scripturecatholic.com/second_coming.html
Catholics ALL believe in Christ’s second coming. ALL Catholics believe in the resurrection of the dead and the 2nd judgement. Why do you suggest we do not believe these things?
Catholics do not need to re-consider “rapture” teaching and every new thing under the sun that comes up in each new generation because The Church condemned this erroneous teaching long ago when it first popped up.
James