Thoughts on taking the kids to Episcopalian mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trryan5
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I couldn’t help remembering that a number of very senior Catholic clergy attended the service of thanksgiving in St Paul’s for the Queen’s diamond jubilee; and the wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge in Westminster Abbey – where they joined, apparently cheerfully, in singing the words of the heretic Charles Wesley; and the enthronement in Canterbury Cathedral of the Archbishop of Canterbury – where the Archbishop (now Cardinal Archbishop) of Westminster read from 2 Corinthians. None of them seemed to have their fingers crossed or, at least outwardly, to be concerned that they were in sin or might be causing scandal to others.
What? Catholic clergy can’t make mistakes? Did their presence convey to you that the Catholic Church is the One, True, Apostolic Church? Or did their presence just leave you feeling that they were just nice clergy from another nice Christian church?
 
What? Catholic clergy can’t make mistakes? Did their presence convey to you that the Catholic Church is the One, True, Apostolic Church? Or did their presence just leave you feeling that they were just nice clergy from another nice Christian church?
What? Of course they can make mistakes. And I did not think to doubt that they were members of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, or that they were clergy, and Christian, and for all I know nice.

I recounted my memory because I thought the OP might like to lay alongside your advice such advice as might be derived from the behaviour of a number of bishops and cardinals of the Church. Wrong?
 
What? Of course they can make mistakes. And I did not think to doubt that they were members of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, or that they were clergy, and Christian, and for all I know nice.

I recounted my memory because I thought the OP might like to lay alongside your advice such advice as might be derived from the behaviour of a number of bishops and cardinals of the Church. Wrong?
Not trying to get further entangled in this, but the bottom line is that people say what they want on the web (including, obviously, that it is a sin against the first commandment to attend an Episcopal liturgy) and then other people choose whether to read it or to do something else with their time. 🙂
 
Not trying to get further entangled in this, but the bottom line is that people say what they want on the web (including, obviously, that it is a sin against the first commandment to attend an Episcopal liturgy) and then other people choose whether to read it or to do something else with their time. 🙂
Excatly; however, Catholics should consider it when examining their conscince next time they go to conffesion.
An Examination of Conscience
AGAINST THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
The First Commandment
Have you doubted in matters of faith? Consulted fortune-tellers? Believed in dreams? Made use of superstitious practices? Gone to places of false worship and taken an active part in the religious services of a false church? Belonged to Masons, Communists, of some other forbidden society? Read anti-Catholic books or papers? Neglected religious instruction? Omitted religious duties through fear or ridicule? Murmured against God, or despaired of His mercy? Have you rashly presumed on His goodness in committing sin? Did you pray in time of temptation? For your family? Have you neglected your daily prayers? Have you recited them carelessly, without devotion, thoughtlessly? Have you missed spending a reasonable amount of time in thanksgiving after Holy Communion? Have you been irreverent toward God, sacred persons, places or things? Have you associated with people who might have a bad influence upon your life? Have you refused to place signs of faith in your home, such as a crucifix, picture of the Blessed Mother or the saints?
 
Not trying to get further entangled in this, but the bottom line is that people say what they want on the web (including, obviously, that it is a sin against the first commandment to attend an Episcopal liturgy) and then other people choose whether to read it or to do something else with their time. 🙂
I’m sorry to have to say this, but sometimes you have a disturbing tendency to talk sense.
 
In the Internet of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. (cf Minority Report)
 
Excatly; however, Catholics should consider it when examining their conscince next time they go to conffesion.
LOL. The Episcopal Mass is a very distant cry from Freemasonry or Communism. I would wager that you have never been to an Episcopalian Mass to compare. But rite II is nearly identical with the Novus Ordo Mass.

BTW, Episcopalians are often called “the Republican party at prayer”.
 
As a Lutheran in full communion with the Episcopal/ Anglican Church, I feel entirely comfortable participating in an Episcopal Mass. Of-course, I also feel the same regarding a Roman Catholic Mass. In-fact, there is very little difference between how the two denominations [Episcopal and Catholic] worship.
 
As a Lutheran in full communion with the Episcopal/ Anglican Church, I feel entirely comfortable participating in an Episcopal Mass. Of-course, I also feel the same regarding a Roman Catholic Mass. In-fact, there is very little difference between how the two denominations [Episcopal and Catholic] worship.
There are still some pretty big differences in content if you ask me (e.g., general absolution/penitential orders/use of the Decalogue, location of the peace in the service, use of sequence hymns), but Rite II is definitely similar to and modeled after the structure of the OF. (The musical choices tend to be pretty drastically different though, at least in my experience.)
 
The Episcopal church does not have mass.
Well, they call it Mass at least for what it’s worth. Are you speaking of the lack of Apostolic succession? During the last century there were a lot of bishops consecrations presided or co-presided by Utrecht Union old catholic bishops who held valid but irregular orders. So now Anglicans have valid but irregular orders.

Oh. I find triumphalism very ugly.
 
Here is a radical thought: if all Christians constitute a priesthood of believers, then all have valid apostolic succession.
 
Well, they call it Mass at least for what it’s worth. Are you speaking of the lack of Apostolic succession? During the last century there were a lot of bishops consecrations presided or co-presided by Utrecht Union old catholic bishops who held valid but irregular orders. So now Anglicans have valid but irregular orders.

Oh. I find triumphalism very ugly.
I find it somewhat commonplace.

PNCC bishops also conducted joint consecration (always joint) with Anglicans, IAW the Agreement of Bonn; the OCs of Utrecht starting in 1932, the PNCC in 1946.

But, as I have oft posted, though that seems to imply (per Ott) valid/illicit episcopal lines were infused, there is no formal RCC comment on this.

GKC
 
There are still some pretty big differences in content if you ask me (e.g., general absolution/penitential orders/use of the Decalogue, location of the peace in the service, use of sequence hymns), but Rite II is definitely similar to and modeled after the structure of the OF. (The musical choices tend to be pretty drastically different though, at least in my experience.)
Yes, you are correct but I think most Catholics would not have any problems following the liturgy in the Episcopal Church. Plus the Catholic Mass has public confession/ assurance of forgiveness at the start of the service. Also music, in my experience, is reliably good in Episcopal parishes. And unlike some Lutherans, the Episcopalians don’t seem all caught up in modern hymns and “faux” protestant-like liturgies.
 
I wouldn’t have a problem with it if I were in your situation, and I’d also make sure to take them to Catholic Mass to fulfill our obligation, and have an open discussion about it.
That’s probably the biggest practical obstacle for me. I don’t think my three-year-old could handle it if we went to mass at our parish and then drove down the street to go to the Episcopal church, or vice versa.
And I understand the need to find a preschool you trust. We were fortunate enough to find one at a nearby parish. There are only a handful that will take children as young as this parish took ours, but it’s left lasting blessings. If it weren’t so expensive ($11k annually per child) we’d still have them there.
Ouch, $11,000? Wow, we’re struggling to put aside $4,700 to send our daughter to kindergarten at our parish school next year.

Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut.
 
Well I think it’s fine, but I might be biased. 😉
Ironically, more Episcopalian churches have features like altar rails that have disappeared from many RC churches in the US. The Anglican English vernacular hymnody tends to be different (and again, actually more “traditional” at times) than what is typically played in RC churches in the US.
Yes, we’ve been inside the church for the Christmas program and it actually looks a lot more like a church than most Catholic churches built in the 20th century. Definitely beautiful inside. And I know they have an organist to play that shiny brass organ. Our parish has an ugly whitewashed organ which just sits there gathering dust. Not that our music is all bad; we sometimes get a violin and flute. The violinist is a tall blind man who has this amazing bass voice. He rarely sings, but when he does it renders the congregation absolutely silent.

My daughter hasn’t mentioned her idea recently, and I’m not going to go during Holy Week, and then we’re taking a week’s trip to visit my parents so maybe the whole thing is going to blow over anyway.
 
Two thoughts come to mind: first, just as we Catholics would be very happy to see an Episcopalian visiting one of our masses (without receiving communion of course) so too I am sure that Episcopalians would be happy to see you.

Second is that some Catholics would see an Episcopalian-attending-Catholic-mass as a first step toward him/her becoming Catholic, so I can only imagine that some Episcopalians have the same idea in reverse.
Yes, I know exactly what you mean. I’ve tried to talk some Protestant friends into attending a Catholic mass before, but they’ve refused because they expect everybody to try to convert them.

I know a few people who work in the office because I volunteer at the school a lot, so we just might end up getting that kind of warm welcome with encouragement to come back next week.

I’m not sure if we’ll go or not. I’ll see if my daughter keeps asking. She’s only five, but to me she seems very smart for her age (of course, I suppose all parents think that of their children). I don’t want to make it seem like this church is some kind of forbidden fruit that is going to fascinate her. But if it was just some passing whim, I’ll let the whole subject drop.
 
Here is a radical thought: if all Christians constitute a priesthood of believers, then all have valid apostolic succession.
Of course, not so radical that we haven’t all heard it a million times before. :cool:
 
I find it somewhat commonplace.

PNCC bishops also conducted joint consecration (always joint) with Anglicans, IAW the Agreement of Bonn; the OCs of Utrecht starting in 1932, the PNCC in 1946.

But, as I have oft posted, though that seems to imply (per Ott) valid/illicit episcopal lines were infused, there is no formal RCC comment on this.

GKC
Just so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top