Who wears the pants in your family?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlanFromWichita
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

AlanFromWichita

Guest
This poll is biased, so it’s OK if you wish to point that out – or not.

I heard a TV preacher once refer to two-income-earning families as a “two headed monster” because to income earners both feel that the income they bring in gives them the right to call the shots on how it is to be used.

Then he admitted that he hires women to work in his ministry. He was not being hypocritical, but just pointing out a lot of what he sees in marriage partners whom he counsels. He didn’t think there was anything sinful about women being employed, but it does lead to power struggles.

I’ve heard others say the man should have final authority.

The evidence doesn’t support that. Every happily married old man I’ve discussed it in grocery checkout lines says the key to a long lasting marriage is to do what you’re told. Therefore happily married men report the key to success if to let the woman be the boss.

Of course, we all know that a smart woman will maintain control by making the man think he is really in charge.

Right?

On a related topic, in two earner families, whose career is important enough to uproot the family and move out of town even if to the detriment of the others’ career? What is the basis of that – the one with most future $$ earning potential? Current salary? Ability to be promoted? The one who has strongest emotional attachment to job? Who cares, if I like the new city better maybe I’ll move on that basis? Is it good to move kids to new schools in new towns?

Alan
 
Hi AlanFromWichita!

I never sat down with a pencil and paper to figure out which one of us made more money but I know that in my case, I’m whipped.
 
Other Eric:
Hi AlanFromWichita!

I never sat down with a pencil and paper to figure out which one of us made more money but I know that in my case, I’m whipped.
LOL!

I got to see a lot of drama this year along these lines as I prepared taxes for couples anywhere from loving and committed to bitter post-divorce fighting.

One got a nasty divorce and husband disappear between the time she signed the return and the time he signed it, so the issue was how she could file wihout his signature.

Yuck.

Alan
 
Oh yeah. The most fun one was my first client of the year. He and his concubine came in, and he told me he was married to some other woman who supposedly moved away last fall.

For tax purposes, I determined he was still married to her, so I could not file him as single, or as head of household. When he saw the tax consequences of being still married to her, he said he wanted to file single. When I refused, he told me that he did last year so it’s ok.

After fifteen minutes of discussion, I finally figured out that he was not, in fact, married to last year’s concubine, nor was he ever. Therefore I could go ahead and file single for him like he wanted to. Further, I found he might be able to claim this year’s concubine as a dependent on this year’s taxes, a fact I thought he’d appreciate.

He got all offended and stood up, and said he could not work with me. I asked him to speak to my manager about dissatisfaction and he refused.

Good riddance!

Next time figure out whether you’re married, then come in here with a straight story.

I’ve probably spent more than two hours this year helping at least four different couples figure out whether they are married or not. Several others asked but I could answer them right off the bat and there really wasn’t a “discusssion” about them.

Alan
 
Well, it’s cloudy here today, so I think we will all wear pants, though yesterday I wore shorts. 😃 I don’t know who makes more money, and I don’t care. I let my parents make decisions as they wish.

Eamon
 
Hi Alan. I agree it is biased, but so is everyone, so I see your point. 🙂 I think the key to being successful in any relationship is to have agreement on who does what, whether it is money, chores, whatever. I don’t think it really matters which is the one to make “The Decision” as long as both agree to it. I know some men who are terrible at finances, so the women do it, and I know some women whose idea of money management is “I still have checks left, so I must still have money to spend”. If two people try to control the same thing, you will have conflict. But if one person is strong (or has strong opinions) in one area, where the other doesn’t, it usually works out fine. Money itself isn’t the problem, it is power. If one person resents the other’s power, then that will cause difficulties. But if both are working together and one doesn’t feel thwarted, then it is fine. Just my :twocents: .
 
Take a guess.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Let’s see, if I count up the kids birthday, Christmas and other holiday gift money, then I’d have to sya they make more money than I do. 🙂

And at times, I think they wear the pants in the family also.
 
My wife makes the day to day decisions, and I retain the right to veto any decisions she comes to. And I make all the major decisions, I listen to her (name removed by moderator)ut, but have the final call.

As the way it should be.
 
40.png
Scott_Lafrance:
Take a guess.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
I hate when you whip this photo out. Your legs put mine to shame. Just a comment however…how many times do you have that skirt rolled at the top to accentuate your thighs? Let’s keep it modest - OK?
 
40.png
jrabs:
I hate when you whip this photo out. Your legs put mine to shame. Just a comment however…how many times do you have that skirt rolled at the top to accentuate your thighs? Let’s keep it modest - OK?
When you got it, flaunt it baby! And I find that waxing gives a much better finish than shaving.
 
I wear the pants…but my wife is the boss.

I’m sure St. Paul is frowning on me…but I have to face facts.
 
Both my parents take charge… my mom with sometimes a little more weight, but that’s okay!
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
This poll is biased, so it’s OK if you wish to point that out – or not.

I heard a TV preacher once refer to two-income-earning families as a “two headed monster” because to income earners both feel that the income they bring in gives them the right to call the shots on how it is to be used.

Then he admitted that he hires women to work in his ministry. He was not being hypocritical, but just pointing out a lot of what he sees in marriage partners whom he counsels. He didn’t think there was anything sinful about women being employed, but it does lead to power struggles.

I’ve heard others say the man should have final authority.

The evidence doesn’t support that. Every happily married old man I’ve discussed it in grocery checkout lines says the key to a long lasting marriage is to do what you’re told. Therefore happily married men report the key to success if to let the woman be the boss.

Of course, we all know that a smart woman will maintain control by making the man think he is really in charge.

Right?

On a related topic, in two earner families, whose career is important enough to uproot the family and move out of town even if to the detriment of the others’ career? What is the basis of that – the one with most future $$ earning potential? Current salary? Ability to be promoted? The one who has strongest emotional attachment to job? Who cares, if I like the new city better maybe I’ll move on that basis? Is it good to move kids to new schools in new towns?

Alan
I, personally do not think that women should “wear the pants in the family”. It causes an entire confusion of roles, where men become incompetent wimps, and women become aggressive amazons–ycch. Sorry folks, this is my view. I believe it is supported Scripturally too. Yes, there are definate occasions when a woman has to do what she has to do, yes, I know, and I have had to realize this too in my own life, not talking about that, about any exceptions, rather in general, role confusion, prevelant in today’s society. I do believe the man should have the final authority in the home, family, and in the marriage. For example, my hubby is re-financing our home, yet again. :confused: I do not think it is the wisest decision, but he feels it is. I must, yield to him, because he is my husband. He’ll see, sooner or later, that it was the wrong one, but HE must see it himself, not me forcing things. This, I believe is the key. Just like I believe, when women are full-force career women by choice, (not necessity), they become much less feminine, and this can and does turn men away. But alot of times, we women must realize this ourselves too, which I did, luckily, before my marriage ended. So, yes, I believe in role definition. And thank God for them, for making us different.🙂 I love being a woman, being feminine, and knowing I can count on my hubby (not as much as I’d like to) but still that I can in general.
 
I make most of the decisions because my husband doesn’t really have a preference as to how most things are done around the house. However, if we’re ever at an impass, he makes the final decision.

Scout :tiphat:
 
Hey “Alan from Witchita”-----Is that pic you? Just must ask, what’s with those shoes???

In any event, you’re adorable! We should all post our pic here, what do you all think? That way we can all know each other???

Have heard it said: ***“The man is the head of the family, but the wife is the neck, which turns the head”. ***

How true!!!😃
 
In my house I, the husband, make all the big decisions. My wife, the wife, makes all the little decisions. For example a little decision would be to decide which ones are little and which ones are big. A darn good arrangement.
James
 
40.png
sparkle:
I, personally do not think that women should “wear the pants in the family”. It causes an entire confusion of roles, where men become incompetent wimps, and women become aggressive amazons–ycch. Sorry folks, this is my view. I believe it is supported Scripturally too. Yes, there are definate occasions when a woman has to do what she has to do, yes, I know, and I have had to realize this too in my own life, not talking about that, about any exceptions, rather in general, role confusion, prevelant in today’s society. I do believe the man should have the final authority in the home, family, and in the marriage. For example, my hubby is re-financing our home, yet again. :confused: I do not think it is the wisest decision, but he feels it is. I must, yield to him, because he is my husband. He’ll see, sooner or later, that it was the wrong one, but HE must see it himself, not me forcing things. This, I believe is the key. Just like I believe, when women are full-force career women by choice, (not necessity), they become much less feminine, and this can and does turn men away. But alot of times, we women must realize this ourselves too, which I did, luckily, before my marriage ended. So, yes, I believe in role definition. And thank God for them, for making us different.🙂 I love being a woman, being feminine, and knowing I can count on my hubby (not as much as I’d like to) but still that I can in general.
Dear Sparkle,

All of your other threads suggest that your marriage is in deep trouble and that whatever arrangement you and your husband have going for you is not working out, but is rather highly disfunctional.

My heart goes out to you, and I am sorry for your situation, but it seems to me that this might be a good time to completely reevaluate your statements articulated above; it sounds like a good deal of denial is going on. Marriage is about two fully responsible adults cooperating in a common life–role definition might not be a bad thing, but if it leads to one partner needing to be “taken care of” and the other partner either lording it over her because he brings in the money, or alternatively, slacking off like a spoiled little boy, then the basis of such definition is seriously faulty. Such relationships parallel a parent-child dynamic instead of a healthy spousal friendship/cooperation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top