A
AlanFromWichita
Guest
This poll is biased, so it’s OK if you wish to point that out – or not.
I heard a TV preacher once refer to two-income-earning families as a “two headed monster” because to income earners both feel that the income they bring in gives them the right to call the shots on how it is to be used.
Then he admitted that he hires women to work in his ministry. He was not being hypocritical, but just pointing out a lot of what he sees in marriage partners whom he counsels. He didn’t think there was anything sinful about women being employed, but it does lead to power struggles.
I’ve heard others say the man should have final authority.
The evidence doesn’t support that. Every happily married old man I’ve discussed it in grocery checkout lines says the key to a long lasting marriage is to do what you’re told. Therefore happily married men report the key to success if to let the woman be the boss.
Of course, we all know that a smart woman will maintain control by making the man think he is really in charge.
Right?
On a related topic, in two earner families, whose career is important enough to uproot the family and move out of town even if to the detriment of the others’ career? What is the basis of that – the one with most future $$ earning potential? Current salary? Ability to be promoted? The one who has strongest emotional attachment to job? Who cares, if I like the new city better maybe I’ll move on that basis? Is it good to move kids to new schools in new towns?
Alan
I heard a TV preacher once refer to two-income-earning families as a “two headed monster” because to income earners both feel that the income they bring in gives them the right to call the shots on how it is to be used.
Then he admitted that he hires women to work in his ministry. He was not being hypocritical, but just pointing out a lot of what he sees in marriage partners whom he counsels. He didn’t think there was anything sinful about women being employed, but it does lead to power struggles.
I’ve heard others say the man should have final authority.
The evidence doesn’t support that. Every happily married old man I’ve discussed it in grocery checkout lines says the key to a long lasting marriage is to do what you’re told. Therefore happily married men report the key to success if to let the woman be the boss.
Of course, we all know that a smart woman will maintain control by making the man think he is really in charge.
Right?
On a related topic, in two earner families, whose career is important enough to uproot the family and move out of town even if to the detriment of the others’ career? What is the basis of that – the one with most future $$ earning potential? Current salary? Ability to be promoted? The one who has strongest emotional attachment to job? Who cares, if I like the new city better maybe I’ll move on that basis? Is it good to move kids to new schools in new towns?
Alan