1 Tim 3:15 - The Church pillar of the truth

  • Thread starter Thread starter roque4jesus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would he be open to using Catholic sources? I think if he expects you to read Protestant sources, he should be open to Catholic ones.
 
I was exchanging with a protestant about this verse and he responded with this article. Can someone comment on how to respond to this article?
It is hard to discuss if we don’t know the specific application that you were making in referring to 1 Timothy 3:15. Would you be able to summarize how you were using this verse, and to what end you were appealing to it? That would help put things in context.
 
Actually, other than his opening claim of the Church being the source of truth (the Church makes no such claim) and other misrepresentations of Catholicism (his comments on celibacy, etc. are old, tired, and laughable), and his conclusions, I have little objection about his treatment, especially of the Greek.

The better translation of the passage is “pillar and buttress”, in the sense of support. Think the flying buttresses of Gothic churches: they hold up the structure and prevent it from collapsing outward. That’s what the Church does: it simply upholds and supports the truth, which she receives. She does not invent the truth.

Since the Church is indeed the buttress of the truth, then naturally we can conclude that it has authority and protection to do so. Otherwise, a church that falls into error wouldn’t do very well as a buttress of the truth now, wouldn’t it? That’s where he fails. After treating the Greek pretty fairly, he then just falls back to each believer to his own, the very reason behind the splintering of Western Christendom.
 
Last edited:
We were talking about the fact that Sola Scriptura is not in the Bible and that the Church is the pillar of the truth, not the book. He gave me this article to read
In other words, you were using 1 Timothy 3:15 out of context, which is probably why you got yourself into trouble. I would be happy to explain why I say that if you are interested.
 
Last edited:
The article says, “In fact, in verse 14 Paul specifically says that his written words are what define proper conduct. This actually suggests the concept of sola scriptura ; Paul is assigning authority to the written Word. He does not say, “The church will tell you what this letter means.”

It seems as though they do not realize:

Paul could not be proposing “sola scriptura” because he did not know his letter would be counted later as scripture.

As an apostle and a leader in the One Holy and Apostolic Church, he was acknowledging his own authority to teach, his authority given by Christ to lead the Church. Otherwise, if he were advocating “sola scriptura” then he would only rely on OT passages and possibly the written gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

As for the passage about forbidding marriage, the Church has authority to bond and loose and as times change and to improve “laws,” not by dissenting from Christ’s teaching but putting it to greater use.

And the scripture verse, 1 Timothy 4:3, “They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth.“ Notice how closely it is tied to abstaining from certain foods, and he doesn’t say anything about priesthood. Almost clearly talking of either Jews who regarded the OT laws about food, or those today promoting veganism / vegetarianism to be the only right diet. The Church declares that Christ declared all foods clean in Mark 7:19.

As for abstaining from marriage: Matthew 19:12 says “For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others–and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it."
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top