22 churches sui iuris

  • Thread starter Thread starter twf
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

twf

Guest
It is often said on this board that there are 22 (or is it 23?) particular churches sui iuris comprising the Catholic Church universal. I realize that this number is based upon official Vatican lists - but my question is, is this number really accurate? For example, several of the “churches” on this list have no hierarchy, and in all probability, will not anytime soon. I mean no disrepect to the faithful of these communities whatsoever, but from a theological perspective, is a church a church without a bishop? According to the Fathers and Catholic theology it is not. Also, I also understand that there is no real canonical relationship between the Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic Metropolia of Pittsburg and the jurisdictions in Europe; so when it comes down to it, are there not really two or three distinct Ruthenian churches sui iuris? The two eparchies of the Italo-Albanian Greek Catholic Church are also, as I understand, administratively independent from each other, with neither bishop answering to the other…so are there not, in actuality, two Byzantine Catholic Churches sui iuris native to Italy?
 
It is often said on this board that there are 22 (or is it 23?) particular churches sui iuris comprising the Catholic Church universal. I realize that this number is based upon official Vatican lists - but my question is, is this number really accurate? For example, several of the “churches” on this list have no hierarchy, and in all probability, will not anytime soon. I mean no disrepect to the faithful of these communities whatsoever, but from a theological perspective, is a church a church without a bishop? According to the Fathers and Catholic theology it is not. Also, I also understand that there is no real canonical relationship between the Byzantine (Ruthenian) Catholic Metropolia of Pittsburg and the jurisdictions in Europe; so when it comes down to it, are there not really two or three distinct Ruthenian churches sui iuris? The two eparchies of the Italo-Albanian Greek Catholic Church are also, as I understand, administratively independent from each other, with neither bishop answering to the other…so are there not, in actuality, two Byzantine Catholic Churches sui iuris native to Italy?
The hierarchy by which the Christian faithful are united does not have to be of their own ritual Church, only it must be a Catholic Church. The hierarch is the link to the Universal Catholic Church. So there are many eparchies (and equivalent) that are neither Metropolitan, Major Archepiscopal, nor Patriarchal in structure. At the very least the Holy See (Congregation for Eastern Churches) is caring for them and a local bishop of a different Church sui iuris.For example Russian Catholics in the USA are placed in the care of a bishop of a different Church *sui iuris, which by default (in canon law) is the Latin Church. *Some of the smallest are:

Albanian
Ordinary/Hierarch: vacant see, Hil Kabashi, O.F.M., Apostolic Administrator
**Russian **
Ordinary/Hierarch: vacant see, Joseph Werth, Apostolic Administrator of Siberia
Belarusian
Ordinary/Hierarch: vacant see, Alexander Nadson, Apostolic Visitator

There is a definition of a Church sui iuris (own laws):
CCEO Canon 27
A group of Christian faithful united by a hierarchy according to the norm of law which the supreme authority of the Church expressly or tacitly recognizes as sui iuris is called in this Code a Church sui iuris.

CCEO Canon 174
A Church sui iuris, which is neither patriarchal, major archiepiscopal nor metropolitan is entrusted to a hierarch who presides over it according to the norm of common law and particular law established by the Roman Pontiff.
That is why we have the number of Church sui iuris that we have, as 22 Eastern Churches sui iuris are officially recognized in the Annuario Pontifico, the most recent being the Syro-Malankara (1930) and the Macedonian (when Yugoslavia was formed in 1918, later supressed, and revived again).

cnewa.org/source-images/Roberson-eastcath-statistics/eastcatholic-stat10.pdf

Some other jurisdictions other than Eparchy or Exarchy are:
Apostolic Vicariates (Latin), Apostolic Eparchy or Exarchy (Eastern),
Apostolic Prefectures, Apostolic Administrations, and Missions sui juris.

Often the prelates of these jurisdictions report directly to the Holy See.

You refer to jurisdictions of the Ruthenian Catholic Church which are six:

Eparchy of Mukacheve (Ukraine)
Apostolic Exarchate of Czech Republic, Faithful of Eastern Rite
Archeparchy of Pittsburgh (USA)
Eparchy of Passaic (USA)
Eparchy of Parma (USA)
Holy Protection of Mary Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Phoenix (USA)

The first three are directly subject to the Holy See (Congregation for Eastern Churches).

Only one Italo-Albanian Church sui iuris with three jurisdictions, all directly subject to the Holy See:

Eparchy of Lungro degli Italo-Albanesi
Eparchy of Piana degli Albanesi
Territorial Abbacy of Santa Maria di Grottaferrata
 
For example Russian Catholics in the USA are placed in the care of a bishop of a different Church* sui iuris*, which by default (in canon law) is the Latin Church.
Also, for example, we Russians in the two California parishes have spiritual omophorion of the Melkite Eparchy of Newton and the Denver parish spiritual omophorion of the Romanian Eparchy of St George in Canton. This means at least in the case of my parish, ordination was done by the Melkite Bishop Nicholas, recently named Eparch. 🙂
 
Also, for example, we Russians in the two California parishes have spiritual omophorion of the Melkite Eparchy of Newton and the Denver parish spiritual omophorion of the Romanian Eparchy of St George in Canton. This means at least in the case of my parish, ordination was done by the Melkite Bishop Nicholas, recently named Eparch. 🙂
So is your proper bishop the Melkite bishop then, or is this a matter of incardination of the priests only?
 
5Loaves,
I remember reading that the Our Lady of Fatima Russian Greek Catholic Church has Archbishop George H. Niederauer as the proper ordinary. Bishop George should be mentioned in the Diptych in the Divine Liturgy.

There are many eastern Catholics parishes of different ritual Churches, is the situation where they have Latin Church bishops and/or Latin biritual priests. Conversely, the Latin parishes in Eritrea have a Eritrean Catholic bishop becase there are no Latin Church bishops with jurisdiction there.
 
5Loaves,
I remember reading that the Our Lady of Fatima Russian Greek Catholic Church has Archbishop George H. Niederauer as the proper ordinary. Bishop George should be mentioned in the Diptych in the Divine Liturgy.
We commemorate His Holiness Benedict, Pope of Rome, Patriarch Gregorios, Archbishop George, Bishops, Ignatius, William and Robert.

Fr. Loya in his program #348: “Churches Without Their Own Bishops” May 24, 2011 regarding his visit to our parish commented with some interest that we commemorate the Orthodox Patriarch, calling it a kind of special ecumenical prayer, which he speculated came from a freedom we have by virtue of not having our own particular bishop. “…Again we pray for the blessed and ever-memorable most holy Orthodox Patriarchs, the blessed and ever-memorable founders of this holy temple and for all our fathers and brethren, the Orthodox departed this life before us, who here and in all the world lie asleep in the Lord.”

I was surprised when I heard Fr. Tom’s comment. I thought “Don’t all Eastern Catholics commemorate the Orthodox?” I see the Melkite text reads “…we pray for the blessed and ever-memorable founders of this holy church and for our Orthodox fathers and brethren who here and elsewhere lie asleep in the Lord.” What do other Churches substitute for the word “Orthodox” in this Litany of Fervent Supplication"?

Last Sunday was the Feast of All Saints of North America. Fr. Vito reminded us in his homily that we have a saint of North America right in our neighborhood and encouraged us to venerate the relics of the incorrupt St. John Maximovitch whose tomb is in the ROCOR Holy Virgin Cathedral a few blocks from us.
 
Does anyone have a complete list?
Eastern Catholic Statatistics 2010
4,350,735 Ukrainian * (Union of Brest 1595)
3,828,591 Syro-Malabar #
3,290,539 Maronite %
1,614,604 Melkite * (1724 Syrian-Byzantine)
707,452 Romanian * (Act of Union of 1698, Metr. Atanasie Anghel)
646,243 Ruthenian * (Union of Uzhorod 1646)
593,459 Armenian @
490,371 Chaldean #
420,081 Syro-Malankara %
290,000 Hungarian * (Union of Uzhorod 1646)
239,394 Slovak * (Union of Uzhorod 1646)
229,547 Ethiopian/Eritrean $
163,630 Coptic $
158,818 Syrian %
61,487 Italo-Albanian *
43,878 Krizevci (Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo) *
15,037 Macedonian *
10,000 Bulgarian *
3,845 Albanian *
2,525 Greek *
? Russian *
? Belarusian*

147,600 No Hierarchy (Argentina, Austria, Brazil, France, Poland)
  • Byzantine (Ukrainian, Melkite, Romanian, Ruthenian, …)

Chaldean (Malabar, Chaldean)​

% Antiochian (Maronite, Malankara, Syrian)
@ Armenian (Armenian)
$ Alexandrian (Coptic, Ethiopian/Eritrean)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top