A ? about the CC, Cannon Laws and Tradition

  • Thread starter Thread starter adelore
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

adelore

Guest
Since Catholics don’t believe in “Solo Scripture” like Prodesents do, because we follow Church Tradition, the Catholic Catechism and the Cannon Laws. Here’s the Question.

If something isn’t mentioned in the Vatican ll Cannon Laws and isn’t mentioned in the CC. does that mean we **don’t **follow it anymore, even if it’s been a Tradition for years?

The second question is this. "If the Vatican ll Cannon Laws don’t mention “certian things” that were part of the Cannon Laws before does that mean they’ve been Abolished?

Now because I really don’t know…where do these things fall under? Catholic Catechism, Vatican ll Cannon Laws, Pre-Vatican ll Cannon Laws, or Tradition?
  1. The Sign of the Cross
  2. Genuflection on Left Knee
  3. Saying Amen and making the Sign of the Cross after recieving Communion
 
i do not think that just because things are not mentioned in the vadican ii cannon laws does not dismiss the fact that they still are things that apply to us today. if they were not mentioned that to me means that they did not change from before. therefore we should still be doing it the same as before. God bless you for pointing this out.👍
 
  1. The Sign of the Cross
  2. Genuflection on Left Knee
  3. Saying Amen and making the Sign of the Cross after recieving Communion
If you’re talking about these things in the context of the Mass, they come under the GIRM (General Instruction of the Roman Missal) which can be found at usccb.org/liturgy/current/revmissalisromanien.shtml

For example:
  1. When the Entrance chant is concluded, the priest stands at the chair and, together with the whole gathering, makes the Sign of the Cross. Then he signifies the presence of the Lord to the community gathered there by means of the Greeting. By this Greeting and the people’s response, the mystery of the Church gathered together is made manifest.
When receiving communion the procedure is:
  1. If Communion is given only under the species of bread, the priest raises the host slightly and shows it to each, saying, Corpus Christi (The Body of Christ). **The communicant replies, Amen, **and receives the Sacrament either on the tongue or, where this is allowed and if the communicant so chooses, in the hand. As soon as the communicant receives the host, he or she consumes it entirely.
Nothing is said about making the Sign of the Cross after receiving. I would put it in the category of “pious custom.” In other words, if you want to do it go ahead, but there’s no requirement to do it.

As far as genuflecting, the USCCB has an article on the Real Presence that says this:

The Body and Blood of Christ present under the appearances of bread and wine are treated with the greatest reverence both during and after the celebration of the Eucharist (cf. Mysterium Fidei, nos. 56-61). For example, the tabernacle in which the consecrated bread is reserved is placed “in some part of the church or oratory which is distinguished, conspicuous, beautifully decorated, and suitable for prayer” (Code of Canon Law, Can. 938, §2). According to the tradition of the Latin Church, one should genuflect in the presence of the tabernacle containing the reserved sacrament. In the Eastern Catholic Churches, the traditional practice is to make the sign of the cross and to bow profoundly. The liturgical gestures from both traditions reflect reverence, respect, and adoration. It is appropriate for the members of the assembly to greet each other in the gathering space of the church (that is, the vestibule or narthex), but it is not appropriate to speak in loud or boisterous tones in the body of the church (that is, the nave) because of the presence of Christ in the tabernacle. Also, the Church requires everyone to fast before receiving the Body and Blood of Christ as a sign of reverence and recollection (unless illness prevents one from doing so). In the Latin Church, one must generally fast for at least one hour; members of Eastern Catholic Churches must follow the practice established by their own Church.

You can see that they’re not citing the Catechism, Canon Law, etc.
 
**Now because I really don’t know…where do these things fall under? Catholic Catechism, Vatican ll Cannon Laws, Pre-Vatican ll Cannon Laws, or Tradition?
  1. The Sign of the Cross
  2. Genuflection on Left Knee
  3. Saying Amen and making the Sign of the Cross after recieving Communion**
**These are more immemorial customs.

However, one properly genuflects on the left knee to a Latin Bishop or Abbot.

BTW, I don’t know what you mean by “Vatican II Cannon [sic] Laws.” Do you? Vatican II promulgated no code of canon law.**
 
OP:
The second question is this. "If the Vatican ll Canon Laws don’t mention “certain things” that were part of the Canon Laws before does that mean they’ve been Abolished?
If I understand your question correctly, the former tenets of Canon Law dated 1917 are specifically “abolished” per the reference below in the new Canon Law of 1983:
Can. 6 §1. When this Code takes force, the following are abrogated:
1/ the Code of Canon Law promulgated in 1917;
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top