A girls' right to her father doesn't matter. Protecting 'marriage equality' does

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JimG

Guest
A little girl in New York is in foster care, even though her father is a perfectly fit parent. The court will not even recognize him as her father. How is this possible, you ask?

The little girl’s mother is in a same sex union. The girl is in foster care, because of neglect petitions pending against both the mother and her lover. The five-judge panel agreed that the fact that the child was in foster care was “relevant” and “concerning.” They nevertheless denied the father’s request to prove his fatherhood.

Continued here
 
Last edited:
The ruling class run on alternative facts (i.e. fiction).
 
Last edited:
Strange things happen when society denies objective truth – male, female, parent, child.
 
Last edited:
The court is probably going by the contract he signed, waiving any parental rights. He really should have gotten legal advice.
 
The courts definitely consider men fathers when women want money. I’m glad I don’t live in New York but the plague is spreading everywhere.
 
If I were that father I’d probably be breaking a few laws to get my daughter home.
 
Did you read it? He is nothing but a sperm donor. He is as big of a jerk as these judges.
 
Seems he’s trying to do the right thing now.
 
Last edited:
hoping4more said:
Did you read it? He is nothing but a sperm donor. He is as big of a jerk as these judges.
Click to expand...
Yes, he was a sperm donor. That was the first wrong thing among several. Sperm donation is just the obverse of contraception and just as wrong.

The next wrong thing, of course, is the same sex ‘marriage’ of two women.

The next wrong thing is that it sounds as though neither of the women were a fit parent, which is why the child is now in foster care.

The next wrong thing is that the actual father cannot even be recognized as a father because of the contract he signed.

A child is entitled to be conceived naturally and to know and be connected to, her father and mother.

Now he wants to do the right thing, finally, by taking responsibility for his child. But the court will not even allow a paternity test—because of that contract.

When adults depart from reality, it’s children who bear the consequences.
 
The biggest wrong thing was the lack of foresight this man showed in “donating” sperm. Once he gave up his rights, he was toast. So this story doesn’t begin now, but back then.

I wish more people were aware of the horror of this crazy LGBT run world. If the father had read more of LifeSiteNews.com, he wouldn’t have been so naive.
 
Lara said:
The biggest wrong thing was the lack of foresight this man showed in “donating” sperm. Once he gave up his rights, he was toast. So this story doesn’t begin now, but back then.

I wish more people were aware of the horror of this crazy LGBT run world. If the father had read more of LifeSiteNews.com, he wouldn’t have been so naive.
Click to expand...
Very true. However, common sense would dictate (at least to me) that the biological father should have the right to be at least a foster father first before anyone else - assuming that he’s fit to care for his biological child.
 
If this were a man and a woman, rather than two women, would the answer be different? For example: my current boyfriend’s legal father is not the same as his biological father. If at some point as a minor he had been removed from their care, his biological father would not have had any parental rights - because he agreed to give them up in favor of his legal father. Under the law, giving up or losing parental rights is a permanent decision that renders the biological parent a legal stranger.
 
DarkLight said:
If this were a man and a woman, rather than two women, would the answer be different? For example: my current boyfriend’s legal father is not the same as his biological father. If at some point as a minor he had been removed from their care, his biological father would not have had any parental rights - because he agreed to give them up in favor of his legal father. Under the law, giving up or losing parental rights is a permanent decision that renders the biological parent a legal stranger.
Click to expand...
I think the courts would rule the same given there was an agreement to being just a sperm donor, not a parent. Only the child of donated sperm has the option of connecting with their bio father, the father can’t butt in as desired.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top