A history of Catholic voting in Australia

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flopfoot
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Flopfoot

Guest
For people like me who were born after Reagan took office in 1981, it can sometimes seem like voting patterns are static and have always been the way they are now. That’s why I wanted to look into the reasons for changes over the last century or so. (It would be similarly interesting to hear from an American how the originally pro-slavery Democrat party turned into the black lives matter party of today.)

The left wing party in Australia is called Labor and the right wing party is called Liberal (this name is a bit weird - think of “classical liberal” if it helps. These days, especially at the state rather than federal level, they’re the “no fun” conservative party).

Skipping over 50,000 years of Aboriginal history, when the First Fleet arrived in 1788, there were many English Protestants among the soldiers and free settlers and many Irish Catholics among the convicts. This pattern didn’t change much - even up until 1960 it was legal and common to see “Catholics need not apply” in job advertisements. So after Federation of states in 1901, Catholics were mainly Labor voters who were for the workers, while Protestants were mainly Liberal voters.

A split began in the Labor party in the 40s and 50s because there was a growing influence of communism. Anti-communist Labor politician B A Santamaria ended up starting his own party (this guy is seen as a hero by Catholics today but overall is considered a pretty controversial figure). Labor didn’t win any elections from 1949 to 1972.

In the 60s anti discrimination laws were passed which allowed Catholics to start getting better jobs and becoming richer. Previously their best option was government jobs. Also in the 60s the government tried to shut down a Catholic school in Goulburn and the parents of students there successfully protested and got it reopened. Seeing that Catholics could be politically active, the Liberal prime minister tried to win some of them over by promising funding to Catholic schools.

In the 80s after Roe v Wade in the USA, Australia copied the USA’s example (we tend to copy either them or England in most things) and formed the moral majority where Christians would vote for right wing parties to try and bring an end to abortion. Note that these days the Labor party is actively pro choice, but the Liberal party is pretty neutral on the abortion issue. This hasn’t stopped Labor from arming themselves for an invisible war - more and more pro choice women are being chosen to be Labor candidates across the country.

continued in second post
 
There are two main groups of (practicing) Catholics still voting Labor these days, while the rest have moved on to the Liberal party and just put up with its faults.

Firstly the Laborem Exercens Catholics. I choose this name for them from JP2’s encyclical, which in an economic sense is pretty left wing and encourages Catholics to be on the side of workers. These Catholics want to bring Labor back to the way it used to be before communism and abortion ruined it. Unfortunately, they are being fought by others in their own party. Part of Labor’s strength comes from trade unions, and one of the biggest unions is the retail workers union which is run by Catholics. But during the plebiscite on gay marriage (which was made legal around a year ago) lots of people were calling for the blood of the head of that union because he opposed gay marriage.

Secondly the Bleeding Heart Catholics who believe that issues like refugees, poverty, war, and climate change are more important than abortion, and thus see voting Labor as the lesser of two evils even though they tend to be pro life themselves.
 
I’m aware the (elected) Australian Senate is where you can break free from the Liberals and Labour two party system and where smaller parties have a real chance of winning seats. It’s unfortunate there hasn’t been more organization to form a party that can be more representative of practising Christians, particularly those who aren’t crazy about free market economics. Then Australian Christians can send a few who are more representative of them to the Senate to make up for the far from ideal MPs.

It would great if our (Canadian) parliament were more like the Australian one.
 
Last edited:
May I ask why you state B.A.Santamaria as being controversial, Flopfoot?
 
I’m probably in your self defined “bleeding heart” catholic. Not because I think those above mentioned issues are more important than abortion, - just because i don’t see abortion laws ever changing. No other westernized country had changed their stance so I hardly believe it will happen here.

I believe the next best thing to do is create laws that help the disadvantaged. Labor in theory do a better job of that. But I am a socialist a heart economically.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top