A History of Philosophy by Frederick Copleston S.J. Hard or Easy Read?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adawgj
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

adawgj

Guest
I just picked up Fr. Frederick Copleston, S.J.book “A History of Philosophy Medieval Philosophy”

Would this book be easy or difficult to read, because I have little knowledge of philosophy?
 
The best thing to do would be to read a little bit and find out, no? Fr. Coppleston was a very well-known and popular historian of philosophy, and his History of Philosophy series (9 volumes published during his lifetime, plus two more volumes published later; I am unsure how much of the work he did on them) was actually written to be an introductory philosophical text for seminarians. He based this on the needs he saw in the classroom, being a seminary professor himself for a number of years. They are standard reading in the philosophy classes here at my seminary, most of which are peopled by College and Pre-theology seminarians who don’t have background in philosophy. I found them easy to read, but I already had some background in that area.

-ACEGC
 
It helps if you have some knowledge of philosophy. Certainly not a “philosophy for dummies” kind of book.
 
If you are going to read one of his volumes, the Medieval one would likely be the most relevant, assuming you have an interest in Catholicism especially. Protestants too would benefit from it, since much of that volume deals with how Christianity and philosophy interact.

When I read it I had only 3 courses in philosophy. I found it somewhat hard reading, but good. If I could make one complaint about him, he tends to be too thorough in trying to document the contribution and “credit” to a lot of relatively minor philosophers. He takes a historical approach, which is perfectly valid, how did this guy influence that guy, etc.

My suggestion is to read the “Summa of the Summa”, where Peter Kreeft, PhD introduces and annotates excerpts from Thomas Aquinas. Read a some of Plato, Augustine, and a few other key philosophers, with only a little introduction or explanation. You will find with a very little introduction and few footnotes many key philosophers are easier to read than Fr. Coppleston, let alone the many weaker summarizers. But Fr. Coppleston is good in placing readers into the context of a given century.
 
I just picked up Fr. Frederick Copleston, S.J.book “A History of Philosophy Medieval Philosophy”

Would this book be easy or difficult to read, because I have little knowledge of philosophy?
My version has 9 or so volumes and is not overly difficult to read, but is pretty long.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top