A question about a wikipedia article

  • Thread starter Thread starter ntisawesome
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

ntisawesome

Guest
I did a search on Saint Peter on wikipedia, and the following quote comes from the resulting article:
According to Catholic belief, Peter was the first Bishop of Rome, who, by virtue of his position as successor of St. Peter, is the chief pastor of the whole Church, the Vicar of Christ upon earth.[51] Although Peter never bore the title of “Pope”, the Catholic Church recognizes him as the first Pope.[52] Therefore, they consider every pope to be Peter’s successor and the rightful superior of all other bishops. They recognize him as head of the Catholic Church on Earth, Christ being its Heavenly head. They base this claim on the words of Jesus from two famous Petrine texts, John 21:15-17 which concludes with “Feed my sheep” and is seen by Catholics as promising the spiritual supremacy to Simon Peter and “by charging him with the superintendency of all his sheep, without exception; and consequently of his whole flock, that is, of his own church,”[51] and Matthew 16:17-20:
The first sentence confuses me. Were there two Peters? Or is (as I always assumed) Saint Peter and Peter (the rock upon which Christ built his Church) one and the same?
 
It says that Saint Peter was one and the same as the Rock. When it mentions the Successor of Saint Peter, it refers to the subsequent Popes (not Peter as the Successor).
 
Syntax is a hairy little monster that, unfortunately, isn’t as rigidly enforced in schools anymore. le sigh
 
Not surprisingly, someone appears to have already changed the text.
 
Probably not a bad idea. Although upon a more careful examination it does technically say what it means, it is easy to misinterpret.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top