A quick look through various New Testament Apocrypha

  • Thread starter Thread starter patrick457
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

patrick457

Guest
In this thread, we’ll look at various New Testament Apocrypha (heretical or no), especially those concerning the canonical Gospels.

1.) OXYRHYNCHUS 840

S. Kent Brown comments on the text of Oxyrhynchus 840 (The Anchor Bible Dictionary, v. 5, p. 1000):

Found in December 1905, this partial text consists of a small vellum leaf (8.8 x 7.4 cm) written on both sides in a tiny, rather regular hand. The writing is dated by its discoverers to the 4th century, and the copyist exhibits an inclination for using red ink in specific instances such as the first letters of sentences, dots of punctuation and - twice - accent marks.

Some believed that this fragment was likely a portion of a talisman, an amulet for some ancient Egyptian Christian before this single page became detached. A few other books of similar size have been found from late antiquity that are thought to have been intended for some such magical use."
(Verso) “…earlier, before doing wrong, he thinks out everything that is crafty. But be on your guard that you do not also somehow suffer the same things as them. For not only among the living do the evildoers among men receive retribution, but [a]lso they will undergo punishment and mu[c]h torment.
And taking them (the disciples) along, He went into the place of purification itself and walked about in the Temple. And c[o]ming toward them, a certain high priest of the Pharisees, Levi(?) by name, fell in with them and s[aid] to the Savior, “Who permitted you to tram[ple] this place of purification and to look upon [the]se holy vessels although you have not ba[th]e[d] n[o]r have the f[eet] of your disciples been [wa]shed? But after having def[iled] it, you trample this a[rea] of the Temple which is clean, which nobody e[lse except for] a person who has bathed and chan[ged his] [clot]hes tramples on. Nor does he dare to lo[ok upon these] holy vessels!” And s[tanding nearby, the Savior] wit[h His] disciple[s replied],
(Recto) “Then, being here in the Temple, are you clean?” He said to him, “I am clean. For I have bathed myself in the pool of David and after going down by one set of stairs, by another I came back p; and I put on white clothes and they were clean; and then I came and looked upon these holy vessels.
Re[ply]ing to him, the Savior said, “Woe to you blind people who do not s[e]e! You have bathed in those gushing w[a]ter in which dogs and swine have been ca[st] night and day and washing yourselves, you scrubbed the outer layer of skin which also prostitutes and th[e] flute-girls ano[int a]nd bathe and scrub [and p]ut makeup on to become the desi[re] of [t]he men. But from within th[ey are fill]ed with scorpions and [all unr]ighteousness. But I and [my disciples], whom you say have not wa[shed], we [have wa]shed in waters of li[fe eternal co]ming from …B]ut woe to [th]ose…

At the preserved fragment, Jesus is teaching that despite the importance of planning ahead (cf. Luke 12 and 14), evil plans will still result in damnation in the next life. The longer and more interesting story involves ritual cleanliness, thematically similar to Mark 7 and parallels. Jesus and His disciples are admonished by a Pharisaic chief priest (perhaps named Levi, but the text is unclear) for entering the inner sanctuary of the Temple without ritually bathing or changing clothes (there is no other evidence for this purported practice). Jesus counters the Pharisee’s hypocrisy, contrasting ritual cleanliness, gotten by bathing with the same water that harlots and animals (such as ‘dogs and swine’, considered as unclean animals in Jewish law) use to bathe, against the “waters of eternal life” from Heaven in which He and His disciples have bathed in.
 
2.) Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1224
Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1224 (published in 1913), dated somewhere around the late 3rd century-early 4th, consists of a number of fragments comparable to the Synoptics. One fragment presents an analogy between the instruction of a ‘new teaching’, and the proclamation of a ‘new baptism’.

Some have attempted to connect this with the Apocryphal Gospel of Peter, based on its employment of a first-person narrative perspective. Nevertheless, Oxyrhynchus 1224 nowhere overlaps the fourteen chapters of the Akhmim fragment, so any connection is only conjectural.
Fragment 1 recto:
…in everything…Amen……**”
Fragment 1 verso:
…he will. You …]…
Fragment 2 recto, column 1:
…it weighed me down. And, [having stood] by, Jesus *n a visi[on says:] “*Why are you dis[our]aged? For not…[y]ou, but the…**”
Fragment 2 verso, column 1:
…you sa]id, not answer[ing. What therefore did you re]nounce? W[h]at kind [of] ne[w teach]ing [do they say] that [you teach, or what] ne[w b]a[ptism] [do you preach? Answ]er and…
Fragment 2 verso, column 2:
…But the scribes an[d Phari]sees and priests, see[ing him] were indignant [that with sin]ners, in their mid[st, He reclined.] But Jesus heard and [said: “*No need ha]ve the h[ealthy of a physician], b[ut…]”
Fragment 2 recto, column 2:
…a]nd pray on behalf of [the ene]mies of yours. For he who is not [against y]ou is for you. [He who today i]s far away tomorrow [close at hand to you will] be, and in …] the adver[sary]…
 
3.) Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 4009
A tiny scrap of papyrus (dated somewhere around the 2nd century), now presently located at the Ashmolean Museum. The main content has some parallels with Matthew 10:16 (Luke 10.3) and Matthew 10:28 (cf. Luke 12.4).

Some have again suggested that this may be a fragment of the Gospel of Peter (based on the first-person singular perspective), but again, this is mere conjecture.
(Recto [based on a reconstruction of the Greek]) “…unto…and…the harvest. [So be inno]cent as [doves a]nd wise [as serpents.] Make yourselves as [sheep in the mid]st of wolves.
im, “If then we [should be torn apart?]” [Answering,] He said to me, "Although the [wolves are tear]ing the [lamb apart, they are ne]ver [able] to do any[thing] to him. Thu[s, I say to y]ou: do [n]ot be af[raid of those who] ki[ll y]ou but [who are] nev[er ab]le [to do anything]…and…*"
(Verso) …nothin[g]…present… [com]ing…through…since [a]way…together…to him from…I…by nam[e]…ing: Lord,…nothi[ng]…I …
 
3.) The Akhmim Fragment (The Gospel of Peter)
The Gospel of Peter was a prominent passion narrative in the early history of Christianity, but over time passed out of common usage, due to its Docetist tendencies. The surviving text is notable for ascribing responsibility for the crucifixion of Jesus to Herod Antipas rather than to Pontius Pilate and for representing the Cross as miraculously capable of speech.

In 1886, an 8th or 9th-century manuscript that had been buried with an Egyptian monk was first recovered by a French archaeologist, Urbain Bouriant. This fragment of the Gospel of Peter (now in the Cairo Museum) was the first non-canonical gospel to have been rediscovered, preserved in the dry sand of Egypt. Publication, delayed until 1892, occasioned intense interest. From the passion sequence that is preserved, it is clear that the gospel was a narrative gospel, but whether a complete narrative similar to the canonical gospels or simply a Passion cannot be said.

Two other papyrus fragments from Oxyrhyncus (P.Oxy 4009 and P.Oxy. 2949) dating to the 2nd or early 3rd century, have turned up since. They are possibly but not conclusively from the Gospel of Peter, and would suggest, if they belonged, that the text was more than just a passion narrative.

Though there are parallels with the three synoptic gospels, Peter does not use any of the material unique to Matthew or unique to Luke, leading to two differing conclusions.

1.) Ron Cameron and others conclude that the author may have written independently of the synoptic Gospels and may have directly or indirectly used the Q Gospel, a hypothetical source also employed by the authors of Luke and Matthew, but applying to his borrowings a theology (including docetism) that was unacceptable to the developing mainstream Christianity. A consequence of this is the potential existence of a Passion Narrative (John Dominic Crossan calls this a “Cross Gospel”), a source text that formed the basis of the passion narratives in Matthew, Luke, and Mark, as well as in Peter.

2.) Raymond E. Brown and others find that the author may have been acquainted with the synoptic gospels and even with the Gospel of John; Brown (The Death of the Messiah) even suggests that the author’s source in the canonic gospels was transmitted orally, through readings in the churches, i.e that the text is based on what the author remembers about the other gospels, together with his own embellishments.
1: …but of t[he] Jews no one washed his hands, neither did Herod nor any [o]ne of his judges. And since they did [not] want to wash, Pilate st[o]od up. Then, Herod the king orders that the Lord be taken away, saying to them, “Do what I commanded you to do to Him.
2: Joseph, the friend of Pilate and the Lord, was there. And knowing that they were about to crucify Him, he went to Pilate and asked for the body of the Lord for burial. And Pilate sent to Herod and asked for His body. And Herod replied, “Brother Pilate, even if nobody had asked for Him, we would have buried Him because the Sabbath is drawing near. For it is written in the Law, 'The sun must not set upon one who has been executed.’” And He delievered Him over to the people on the day before the day of Unleavened Bread, their feast.
The sun must not set upon one who has been executed: see Deuteronomy 21:22-23.
 
3: And they took the Lord and kept pushing him along as they ran and said, “Let us push the son of God since we have Him in our authority.” And they put a purple robe around him and sat Him down on the judgment seat, saying, “Judge justly, king of Israel!” And one of them brought a crown of thorns and set it upon the Lord’s head; and others stood and spat in His eyes, and others struck His cheeks. Others pricked Him with a reed and some flogged Him, saying, “With this honor let us honor the son of God!
4: And they brought two criminals, and crucified the Lord in between them. But He kept silent, as one feeling no pain. And when they set the cross upright they inscribed thereon, “This is the King of Israel.” And they laid His garments before Him, they divided them and cast lots for them.
But one of those criminals reviled them, saying, “We have been made suffer thus because of the wrong that we have done; but He, the one who is the Savior of mankind, what wrong has He done to you?” And they were angry at him, and ordered that his legs should not be broken, so that he might die in torment.
5: Now it was noonday, and darkness prevailed over all Judea; and they were troubled and in an agony lest the sun should have set, for that he yet lived: for it is written for them that The sun must not set upon one who has been executed.
And one of them said: “Give Him gall with vinegar to drink;” and they mingled it and gave Him to drink; and they fulfilled all things and accomplished their sins upon their own heads.
And many went about with lamps, supposing that it was night: and some fell. And the Lord cried out aloud saying: “My Power, O Power, you have abandoned me!” And when He had said this, He was taken up. And in the same hour was the veil of the Temple of Jerusalem rent in two.
Criminals: The author uses the same word that Luke uses for the two malefactors, kakourgous.

As one feeling no pain (ōs mēdena ponon echōn): This is one of the portions that led early Christians to condemn the gospel as Docetic (the belief that Jesus’ physical body was an illusion, i.e. He only seemed to have a physical body and to physically die, but in reality He was incorporeal, a pure spirit); another explanation proposed is that either this was an expression of valiant heroism or a reference to Isaiah 53:7.

Ordered that his legs should not be broken: The breaking or shattering of the crucified condemned’s legs (crucifragium) was usually administered as a coup de grâce to hasten the victim’s death.

Gall with vinegar (cholēn meta oxous): The author seems to have confused the vinegar or sour wine (the same word, oxous is used in the canonical Gospels) given to Jesus at His death (Matthew 27:48; Mark 15:36; John 19:29) with the gall (or myrrh) and wine (esmyrnismenon or oinon meta cholēs) given before His crucifixion (Matthew 27:34; Mark 15:23).

My Power, O Power, you have abandoned me (He dynamis mou, he dynamis, kateleipsas me): cf. Matt. 27:46; Mk. 15:34. This can be interpreted as signifying the departure of the Logos, divine aeon, or Christ-Spirit from the man Jesus upon His death. Alternatively, in a less problematic (from an orthodox point of view) interpretation, both instances of the term ‘Power’ (dynamis) are circumlocutions for the name of God (Mk. 14.62, Mt. 26.64).

He was taken up (anelēphthē): This is still another ambiguous passage which could either mean that the Christ became separated from the man Jesus at the cross (the more Docetic-Gnostic explanation), a confusing reference to an ascension at the cross, or is merely a dramatic expression for Jesus’ death.

And in the same hour was the veil of the Temple of Jerusalem rent in two: cf. Matthew 27:51; Mark 15:38; Luke 23:45.
 
6: And then they pulled out the nails from the hands of the Lord and set Him on the ground; and the whole earth shook and great fear came over them; then the sun shone, and it was found to be the ninth hour.
And the Jews rejoiced and gave His body to Joseph that he might bury it, since he had seen the great things He had done. And he took the Lord, and washed Him, and rolled him in a linen cloth, and brought Him into his own tomb, which was called the ‘Garden of Joseph’.
7: Then the Jews and the elders and the priests, knowing what evil they had done to themselves, began to mourn and to say, “Woe for our sins! The judgement has drawn near, and the end of Jerusalem!
At the time, I with my companions were grieved; We were hurting and could not understand what had happened. For we were being sought by them as criminals and as wishing to set fire to the Temple. And upon all these things we fasted and sat mourning and weeping night and day until the Sabbath.
8: But the scribes and Pharisees and Elders gathered together when they heard that all the people murmured and beat their breasts saying, “If by His death these mighty signs have come to pass, see how righteous He is.
The elders were afraid and came to Pilate, urging him and saying, “Give us soldiers, that we may guard His sepulchre for three days, lest His disciples come and steal Him away, and the people suppose that He is risen from the dead and do us evil.
Then, Pilate gave them Petronius the centurion with soldiers to guard the tomb. And with them came elders and scribes to the sepulchre, and having rolled a great stone into place together with the centurions and soldiers, everyone there stood at the entrance of the tomb. And they affixed seven seals and they pitched a tent there to keep watch.
And the whole earth shook: cf. Matthew 27:51.

It was found to be the ninth hour: cf. Matthew 27:33; Mark 14:45; Luke 24:44.

The Jews: The Gospel itself could be seen as quite Anti-Semitic in that it seems to exonerate Pilate and the Romans and lay the blame on the Jews for Jesus’ death more virulently than the canonical Gospels; for example, the start of the fragment tells us that Herod and his Jewish judges refuse to ‘wash their hands’, i.e. refuse to declare themselves innocent of Jesus’ blood; Herod, the Jewish king, is the one who orders the death of Jesus; and here, they are the ones who hand the body over to Joseph (as opposed to Pilate).

And he took the Lord: cf. Matthew 27:57-60; Mark 15:46; Luke 23:52-53; John 19:38-42.

At the time, I with my companions: Here, Peter is the supposed speaker.

All the people murmured and beat their breasts: Luke 23:48.

Give us soldiers: cf. Matthew 27:62-66.
 
9: And early in the morning when the Sabbath was drawing on, a crowd came from Jerusalem and the surrounding area that they might see that the sepulchre that was sealed. But on the night in which the Lord’s day was drawing on, as the soldiers kept guard two by two in a watch, a great voice came from heaven. And they saw the hea[v]ens open and two men descend from there with a great light and approach the tomb.
Then, that stone which was put at the door rolled by itself and gave way partially. And the tomb was opened and both young men went in.
10: When therefore those soldiers saw it, they woke up the centurions and elders, for they themselves were all there to keep watch.
And as they declared what things they had seen, again they see three men come forth from the tomb, and two of them supporting One, and a cross following them. The heads of the two reached up to the heavens and the head of Him that was led by them by the hand went beyond the heavens. And they heard a voice from heaven saying, “Did you preach to those who sleep?” And a response was heard from the cross, “Yes!
11: They therefore considered with one another to go and reveal these things to Pilate. While they were still considering these things, the Heavens again are seen to open, and a certain man to descend and enter into the sepulchre. When the centurion and those who were with him saw these things, they hurried in the night to Pilate, leaving the tomb which they were watching, and declared all things which they had seen, being greatly distressed and saying, “Truly, this was the son of God!” Pilate replied and said, “I am clean from the blood of the son of God, this was determined by you.
Then they all drew near and urged him and made him promise to command the centurion and the soldiers to say nothing of the things which they had seen. “For it is better,” they said, “for us to be guilty of the greatest sin before God and not to fall into the hands of the people of Judea and be stoned.” Pilate therefore commanded the centurion and the soldiers to say nothing.
Lord’s day (Kyriakē, literally ‘the Lord’s’): Notice the distinction between the kyriakē and the Sabbath here, with the kyriakē being identified as the ‘first day of the week’ in which Jesus rose (Matt. 28:1; Mark 16:1-2; Luke 24:1; John 20:1).

The full term is Kyriakē imera (the day of the Lord), a term that first appears in Christian literature in the latter half of the 1st century (for example, Revelation 1:10 and Didache 14). Within a few decades, however, the term kyriakē imera became very ubiquitous in Christianity that imera was ellided. Thus, when a Christian writer referred to the kyriakē, his readers understood that Sunday was meant.

That the author referred to the kyriakē in an apocryphal gospel purportedly written by St. Peter indicates that the term kyriake was very widespread and had been in use for some time by early Christians.

And a cross following them: This vision of the gigantic resurrected Jesus being led by two angels and the ‘walking-talking’ cross are some of the unique (fantastic) elements of this gospel, perhaps embellishments by the author.

A few authors have controversially suggested that these legendary accretions date this Gospel earlier than the canonical Gospels, who have simplified the resurrection accounts to give it a more plausible and historical feel.

Went beyond the Heavens: This may be an implicit reference to the ascension.

Did you preach to those who sleep: Also see Sirach 24:5; 1 Peter 3:19.

A response was heard from the cross, “Yes!” (Ypakoē ēkoueto apo tou staurou to Nai): The Akhmim fragment is quite unclear whether the underlined words are actually tinai, oti Nai or ti Nai. The Greek above follows Bouriant’s rendering in his 1892 publication of the text (Editio Princeps).

A certain man to descend: cf. Matthew 28:2-3.

I am clean from the blood of the son of God…For it is better for us to be guilty of the greatest sin before God: This is still another problematic passage which could be potentially interpreted in an Anti-Semitic light. Pilate reminds the Jewish leaders that Jesus’ death was their responsibility, which they accept.

Pilate therefore commanded the centurion and the soldiers to say nothing: cf. Matthew 28:11-15. In an interesting reversal, it is not the chief priests who order the soldiers to keep quiet about what they saw on the tomb, but Pilate.
 
12: And at daybreak of the Lord’s day Mary Magdalene, a disciple of the Lord, who was afraid on account of the Jews since they were inflamed by wrath, had not done for the tomb of the Lord the things that women were accustomed to do for the those who have died and were beloved by them. Having taken with her the women her friends she went to the sepulchre where He was laid. And they feared lest the Jews would see them, and said, “Even if we were not able to weep and lament Him on the day that He was crucified, let us do so now at His tomb. But who will roll the stone away for us that is set upon the door of the tomb, so that we may enter in and sit beside him and do what needs to be done? For great is the stone, and we fear lest anyone see us. And if we are not able, let us put the things that we bring for His memorial at the doorway, weep, and beat until we come to our house.
13: And they went and found the sepulchre open. They drew near to it and looked in and saw a young man sitting the middle of the tomb, of a fair countenance and clad in very bright garment, who said to them, “Why did you come? Whom are you seeking? Not Him who was crucified? He rose and went away, but if you do not believe, bend down and see the place where He lay, since He is not there. For He rose and gone out there where He was sent.” Then the women, frightened, fled.
14: Now it was the last day of the Unleavened Bread, and many were going out, returning to their houses since the feast had ceased. But we the twelve disciples of the Lord wept and grieved, and each, grieving on account of what had come to pass, departed for his house. But I, Simon Peter, and Andrew my brother, having taken our nets, went away to the sea, and there was with us Levi of Alphaeus, whom the Lord…
Took with her the women her friends: cf. Matthew 28:1; Mark 16:1-2; Luke 24:1,10; John 20:1.

But who will roll the stone away for us: cf. Mark 16:3-4.

A young man sitting: cf. Mark 16:5.

Whom are you seeking? cf. Matthew 28:5-7; Mark 16:6-7; Luke 24:5-7.

Gone out there where He was sent: Another reference to the ascension.

The women were frightened and fled: cf. Mark 16:8.

I, Simon Peter, and my brother Andrew: cf. John 21:3.

Whom the Lord: The text finally breaks off at this point. Immediately following this there is ornamentation indicating that this was copied from a text which was itself a fragment.

The Akhmim Fragment (written somewhere around the 8th-9th century, though the contents are obviously of an earlier date), which contains this portion of the Gospel of Peter, also contained a portion of the Book of Enoch in Greek and a description of Heaven and Hell, which is either another fragment of the Gospel, or a portion of the Apocalypse of Peter.
 
4.) Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 2949

(dated somewhere around the late 2nd-early 3rd century)

These fragments also contain the Gospel of Peter, in this case chapter 2:3-5a. Since the text is the same as the Akhmim fragment, it would be provided without further explanation:
(Fragment 1) “…[the] friend of P*l[ate…] that he c[o]mm[an]ded…[com]ing to Pilat[e… bo]dy to the sepulcher…ask[ed…] sayin[g…] him… that…”
(Fragment 2*) “…Pi[late…] someone (?)…”
5.) Serapion, bishop of Antioch
It is believed that the Gospel of Peter was known in a number of local Christian communities and was at least as popular as the Gospel of Mark, which itself was not widely read at that time since it was very much seen as a ‘condensed’ version of the Gospel of Matthew.
Serapion had become bishop of Antioch in 199 AD. Under his jurisdiction (diocese) were not just the churches of Antioch but also the communities in the surrounding area, including that of Rhossus. Bishop Serapion had made a visit to the church of Rhossus, correcting their misperceptions about the Gospel message. While there, he learned that the local Christians used a Gospel allegedly written by Simon Peter. Not knowing the character of the book, but thinking that “if Peter wrote it then it’s good enough for me,” Serapion let the Christians at Rhossus use the Gospel.
That is, until some informers cast doubts on the book’s authenticity, inducing Serapion to read the text for himself. When he finally did so, he realized that there are passages in the Gospel which are susceptible to heretical (Docetic-Gnostic) explanation.
This prompted him to write a document called ‘The So-Called Gospel of Peter’ in which he explained the problems in the text, and that while most of the Gospel are theologically acceptable, some passages (‘additions’) could be misconstrued as supporting a Docetist view. He then concluded that since the Gospel was potentially heretical, then it must not be written by Peter.
Writing to the Christians at Rhossus, he forbade any further use of the Gospel and appended his pamphlet explaining the problematic portions. The Church historian Eusebius quotes the letter and narrates the tale (Ecclesiastical History 6.12.2-6; 6.13.1a), but unfortunately, he does not cite the passages:
It is probable that others have preserved other memorials of Serapion’s literary industry, but there have reached us only those addressed to a certain Domninus, who, in the time of persecution, fell away from faith in Christ to the Jewish will-worship; and those addressed to Pontius and Caricus, ecclesiastical men, and other letters to different persons, and still another work composed by him on the so-called Gospel of Peter.
He wrote this last to refute the falsehoods which that Gospel contained, on account of some in the parish of Rhossus who had been led astray by it into heterodox notions. It may be well to give some brief extracts from his work, showing his opinion of the book. He writes as follows:
*"For we, brethren, receive both Peter and the other apostles as Christ; but we reject intelligently the writings falsely ascribed to them, knowing that such were not handed down to us. When I visited you I supposed that all of you held the true faith, and as I had not read the Gospel which they put forward under the name of Peter, I said, If this is the only thing which occasions dispute among you, let it be read. But now having learned, from what has been told me, that their mind was involved in some heresy, I will hasten to come to you again. Therefore, brethren, expect me shortly.
But you will learn, brethren, from what has been written to you, that we perceived the nature of the heresy of Marcianus, and that, not understanding what he was saying, he contradicted himself. For having obtained this Gospel from others who had studied it diligently, namely, from the successors of those who first used it, whom we call Docetics (for most of their opinions are connected with the teaching of that school) we have been able to read it through, and we find many things in accordance with the true doctrine of the Savior, but some things added to that doctrine, which we have pointed out for you farther on.*
"

Eventually, the Gospel was lost to oblivion in most of the Church and considered apocryphal, though it would seem that in a few places the Gospel lingered on for some time. Apart from the Akhmim Fragment, there was published in 1904 a small (roughly 3? x 4? x 5 1/2?) triangular ostracon believed to date from the 6th-7th century, depicting a crude stick drawing of a man with wide eyes, a long nose, hair on his head, a beard (or collar) on his chin, shoulders, and stick arms with stick hands, one open in a gesture of prayer with the other one holding a cross-topped staff raised up over his head. Surrounding the drawing was the inscription “Saint Peter the Evangelist”, while on the reverse side was still another inscription: “Let us venerate him and accept his Gospel.
 
6.) The Egerton Gospel
The Egerton Gospel (British Library Egerton Papyrus 2) refers to a group of fragments of a codex of a previously unknown gospel, found in Egypt and sold to the British Museum in 1934; the physical fragments are now dated to the very end of the 2nd century, although the date of composition is less clear – perhaps 50-100 AD. It is one of the oldest known fragments of any gospel, or any codex. The British Museum lost no time in publishing it: acquired in the summer of 1934, it was in print in 1935. It is also called the Unknown Gospel, as no ancient source makes reference to it, in addition to being entirely unknown before its publication.

The date of the fragment is established on paleography alone. When the Egerton fragment was first analyzed, the estimated date was rivaled in age only by the John Rylands Library fragment of the Gospel of John (P52). Later, when an additional piece of the same manuscript was identified in the University of Cologne collection (Papyrus Köln 255) and published in 1987 — it fit on the bottom of one of the Egerton pages — a single use of an apostrophe, which was not normally added to Greek punctuation until the 3rd century, sufficed to revise the date of the manuscript. This study placed the manuscript to around the time of Bodmer Papyri P66, c. 200. Despite its apparent historical importance, the text is not well known. It is a mere fragment, and does not bear a clear relationship to any of the four canonical gospels. The Egerton Gospel has been largely ignored outside a small circle of scholars.
(Fragment 1 verso) …And Jesus said to the lawyers: “Punish every wrongdoer and transgressor, and not me…he does, how does he do it?
And turning to the rulers of the people he said this word: “Search the Scriptures, in which you think you have life. These are they which testify about me. Do not suppose that I have come to accuse you to my Father. There is one who accuses you: Moses, in whom you have hoped.
And they said: “We know that God spoke to Moses, but as for you, we do not know, where you are from.” Jesus answered and said to them: “Now is accused your disbelief in those who have been commended by him. For had you believed Moses, you would have believed me. For about me he wrote to your fathers…
(Fragment 1 recto) …and taking up stones together to stone Him. And the rulers laid their hands upon Him to seize Him and hand him over to the crowd. And they could not take Him because the hour of his arrest had not yet come. But the Lord himself, escaping from their hands, withdrew from them.
And behold, a leper coming to him, says: “Teacher Jesus, while traveling with lepers and eating together with them in the inn, I myself also became a leper. If therefore you will, I am clean.” And the Lord said to him: “I will, be clean.
And immediately the leprosy left him. And Jesus said to him: “Go show yourself to the priests and offer concerning the cleansing as Moses commanded and sin no more…
(Fragment 2 recto) Coming to Him, they tested Him in an exacting way, saying: “Teacher Jesus, we know that you have come from God, for what you do testifies beyond all the prophets. Therefore tell us, is it lawful to pay to kings the things which benefit their rule? Shall we pay them or not?
But Jesus, perceiving their purpose and becoming indignant said to them: "Why do you call me teacher with your mouth, not doing what I say? Well did Isaiah prophesy concerning you, saying: 'This people honor me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. And in vain they worship me, teaching as their doctrines the precepts of men…’"
(Fragment 2 verso) “…enclosed…has been subjected uncertainly…its weight unweighted?” And when they where perplexed at the strange question, Jesus, as He walked, stood on the lip of the Jordan river, stretching out His right hand, filled it with…and sowed upon the…And the…water…the…And…before them, he brought forth fruit…much…for joy…
For the parallels with the canonical Gospels see here; for the Greek text see here.

While traveling with lepers: An alternative rendering is, ‘You look for the lepers and were eating with publicans. Have mercy, I am like them.
 
Fragment 2 verso: Various reconstructions for the text have been suggested.
(Dodd:)When a husbandman has enclosed a small seed in a secret place, so that it is invisibly buried, how does its abundance become immeasurable?
And when they where perplexed at the strange question, Jesus, as He walked, stood still upon the verge of the River Jordan, and stretching out His right hand, he filled it with water and sprinkled it upon the shore. And thereupon the sprinkled water made the ground moist, and it was watered before them and brought forth fruit…
(Schmidt:)Why is the seed enclosed in the ground, the abundance buried? Hidden for a short time, it will be immeasurable.
And when they where perplexed at the strange question, Jesus, as He walked, stood on the banks of the River Jordan, and stretching out His right hand, He filled it with seed and sowed it upon the ground. And thereupon He poured sufficient water over it. And looking at the ground before them, the fruit appeared…
(Cerfaux:)(…) enclosed like me, buried, uncertain, and making possible immeasurable abundance?
And when they where perplexed at the strange question, Jesus, as He walked, stood on the banks of the River Jordan, and stretching out His right hand, He took a fig-tree and planted it in the river. And on the water, the roots spread out and fruit appeared…
(Lietzmann:) And when they where perplexed at the strange question, Jesus, as He walked, stood on the banks of the River Jordan, and stretching out His right hand, He filled it with water and sowed on the ground. And the sprinkled water purified(?) the ground. (…) and coming out before them, the fruit appeared.
(Lagrange:) And when they where perplexed at the strange question, Jesus walked at the banks of the River Jordan, and stretching out His right hand, He filled it with sand and sowed seed on the sand. And then He poured running water over it. And it run to seed and coming out before them, the fruit appeared.
 
From the “Epistle of the Apostles”:
1 The book which Jesus Christ revealed unto his disciples: and how that Jesus Christ revealed the book for the company [college] of the apostles, the disciples of Jesus Christ, even the book which is for all men. Simon and Cerinthus, the false apostles, concerning whom it is written that no man shall cleave unto them, for there is in them deceit wherewith they bring men to destruction. [The book hath been written] that ye may be not flinch nor be troubled, and depart not from the word of the Gospel which ye have heard. Like as we heard it, we keep it in remembrance and have written it for the whole world. We commend you our sons and our daughters in joy <in the grace of God (?)> in the name of God the Father the Lord of the world, and of Jesus Christ. Let grace be multiplied upon you.
2 We, John, Thomas, Peter, Andrew, James, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Nathanael, Judas Zelotes, and** Cephas**, write…
Even at verse 2 it’s pretty obvious why this isn’t canonical. 😃 Oddly it seems to be written as a response to Gnosticism.
 
From the “Epistle of the Apostles”:

Even at verse 2 it’s pretty obvious why this isn’t canonical. 😃 Oddly it seems to be written as a response to Gnosticism.
Well, we could glean that some people in the early Church knew only few of the twelve apostles by name (Peter and Andrew, James and John, Thomas, or Matthew count as the more popular ones, not including Judas Iscariot); after that the memory gets quite fuzzy - not surprising, as some of the apostles had many names! - as the Epistola Apostolorum shows. The author even had to conflate and separate to reach the number of eleven!

That being said, there are some Vetus Latina manuscripts which contain Judas Zelotes in place of Thaddeus in Matthew 10:3. The name also appears in the Decretum Gelasianum (traditionally attributed to the 5th century Pope Gelasius but is probably of 6th century South Gallic origin), where the epistle of Jude is attributed to Judas Zelotes, and in the mosaics of the Orthodox Baptistery at Ravenna name one apostle as such.

Judging from these, the tradition of “Judas the Zealot” (different from the Iscariot, mind!) seems to have had been rather prevalent in Gaul and northern Italy - which, however, postdates this writing by a few centuries, which in turn was written in a different location (the Epistula seems to have been originally written in Greek, probably in Egypt, at the 2nd century AD). So who can tell is this is just lucky coincidence or not?
 
Now we get to:
7.) "The Secret Gospel of Mark"
In 1973 Morton Smith published a book on a previously unknown letter of Clement of Alexandria. He stated that, while cataloging documents at the monastery of Mar Saba at the West Bank east of Bethlehem in the summer 1958, he discovered the text of the letter handwritten into the endpapers of Isaac Vossius’ 1646 printed edition of the works of St. Ignatius of Antioch. This letter is consequently referred to as the Mar Saba letter of Clement of Alexandria. Smith published a second book for the popular audience in 1981.

Smith’s books reproduced black-and-white photographs he claimed to have taken at the time of the discovery. In 1976 a group of four scholars visited the monastery, viewed the manuscript, and took color photographs of it. This visit remained unknown until 2003 when one of the party, G.A.G. Stroumsa, published an account of the visit.

In 1977 the volume containing the manuscript was taken to the library of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate in Jerusalem. That same year, the manuscript pages were removed from the bound volume by the librarian Kallistos Dourvas, to be photographed and kept separately. These photographs were published in 2000. Subsequent attempts by scholars to view the manuscript have been unsuccessful. Paleographers, working from Smith’s photographs, have assigned dates from the late seventeenth to the early nineteenth centuries. Nevertheless, doubts have been expressed about its authenticity - with some claiming that it is a hoax by Smith himself or another person, or at least, that the author was not Clement himself but another pseudo-Clement.
  • From the letters of the most holy Clement, of the Stromata.
To Theodoros.

You did well in silencing the unspeakable teachings of the Carpocratians, for these are the “wandering stars” (Jude 1:13) that had been prophesied, who wander from the narrow road of the commandments into an endless abyss, deceived by the fleshly and bodily sins. For having been puffed up of their knowledge - as they say - “of the depths of Satan,” (Revelation 2:24) they do not know that they are throwing themselves down into “the blackness of darkness” (Jude 1:13) of lies. And having boasted that they are free, they have become bondservants of base desires. Such are to be opposed in all ways and altogether. Because even if they say something true, still the lover of the truth should not agree with them, for not all true things are truth, nor should that truth which merely seems true according to human opinions be preferred to the true truth, that according to the faith.

Now, concerning their babblings about the “God-breathed” (cf. 2 Timothy 3:16) Gospel according to Mark, some are wholly lies, while others, even if partly true, nevertheless are not reported truly. For the true things being mixed with inventions are debased so that, as the saying goes, “even the salt has become tasteless” (cf. Matthew 5:13).

As for Mark, then, during Peter’s stay in Rome he wrote an account of the acts of the Lord, not, however, declaring all of them, nor yet hinting at the mystical ones, but picking the things he thought most useful for increasing the faith of those who were being catechized. Then when Peter was martyred, Mark came to Alexandria, bringing both his own knowledge and those of Peter, from which he transferred to his first book the things suitable about knowledge for those who are making progress. Thus he arranged a more spiritual gospel for the use of those who were being perfected.

Nevertheless, he did not reveal the things which are not to be uttered. He did not write out the hierophantic teaching of the Lord, but to the stories already written he added yet others, and, moreover, brought in certain sayings of which he knew the interpretation would, as a mystagogue, lead the hearers into the adyton of the truth which is veiled seven times. Thus he prepared them - in my opinion - not ungrudgingly or unguardedly. And dying, he left his writing to the church in Alexandria, where even now it is still extremely carefully guarded, being read only to those who are being initiated into the great mysteries.

However, since the polluted demons are always devising destruction for the race of man, Carpocrates, taught by them and using their deceptive arts, so enslaved a certain presbyter of the church in Alexandria that he got from him a copy of the mystical gospel, which he both interpreted according to his blasphemous and fleshly authority and, moreover, defiled, mixing with the most spotless and holy words the most shameless lies. From this mixture is derived the teaching of the Carpocratians.

To them, therefore - as I said above - one must never give way. Also, when they put forward their falsifications, one should not concede that the mystical gospel is by Mark, but should deny it even on oath, for not all truth are to be said to everyone. For this reason, the wisdom of God through Solomon gives a message, “Answer a fool from his folly” (cf. Proverbs 26:5), teaching that from those whose minds are blinded the light of the truth should be concealed. Again it says, “From him who has not, it will be taken away,” and, “Let the fool go in darkness.

(continued)
 
(continued)

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/1649/aboutjesus.jpg

But we are the “sons of light” (John 12:36) who have been illuminated by “the dawn from on high” (Luke 1:78) of the Spirit of the Lord. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is,” it says, “there is freedom” (2 Corinthians 3:17), for “to the pure, all things are pure” (Titus 1:15). Therefore to you I will not hesitate to answer the questions you have asked, refuting the falsifications by the very words of the gospel. For example, after “They were in the road, going up to Jerusalem,” and what follows, until “After three days He will arise,” (Mark 10:32-34) it takes up according to the text:

*And they come to Bethany, and a woman, whose brother had died, was there. And coming, she fell down before Jesus and says to Him, “Son of David, have mercy on me!” but the disciples rebuked her. And becoming angry, Jesus went with her to the garden where the tomb was. And immediately from the tomb was heard a great voice, and going near, Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb.

And going in immediately where the young man was, He stretched out a hand and raised him up, holding his hand. The young man looked at Him and loved Him, and began to beseech Him that He might be with him. And going out of the tomb they came into the house of the young man - for he was rich, and after six days Jesus instructed him. And in the evening the youth comes to Him, having a linen cloth thrown around his naked body; and he remained with Him that night, because Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God. And arising from there, He returned to the other side of the Jordan.*

After these things, this follows, “And James and John come to Him,” (Mark 10:35) and all that section. But the “naked man with naked man” and the other things which you wrote about are not found. And after, “And He comes into Jericho,” it adds only:

And the sister of the young man whom Jesus loved, and his mother, and Salome, were there, and Jesus did not welcome them.

But the many other things about which you wrote both seem to be and are lies. Now the true explanation and that which accords with the true philosophy…​

Loved (Egapēsen): While there is some controversy on “love” here (with some claiming that Jesus is depicted here as a homosexual), the word - related to agape - is also found in the New Testament to describe God’s love (John 3:16; 13:1; Ephesians 5:2 for example), yet no one claims that God or Jesus are homosexuals in those passages! The young man is here showing agape to Jesus - which does not really suggest a sexual sort of love (which another word for love, erōs, covers). Clement himself denies any sexual meaning here - which the Carpocratians apparently did.

Having a linen cloth thrown around his naked body: cf. Mark 14:51.

The mystery of the kingdom of God: cf. Mark 4:10, where Jesus describes the inner circle of His disciples as being given “the mystery of the kingdom of God”. This is reserved for them; “those outside” experience everything in riddles and parables lest they see and understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top