Aborting the Golden Goose: Roe vs. Wade Killed Social Security

  • Thread starter Thread starter wjhii
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wjhii

Guest
Aborting the Golden Goose: Roe vs. Wade Killed Social Security
The Real Demographical Time Bomb.

by N. Beaujon
February 20, 2005

Abortion killed not only the viability of the fetus, it killed the viability of our social security, both literally and figuratively. Social security depends on the viability of future generations coming up from behind to support aging populations. Our Social Security system depends on the same.

When Social Security was created there were 16.5 persons employed per each retiree [1] and the majority of them were never expected to live beyond retirement age! (That was the subtle “beauty” of Roosevelt’s system.) Today that ratio has dwindled down to 3. By 2030, when the last of the baby boomers are expected to retire, there will be 2 employees carrying each retiree. [2]Where do you suppose all those “future employees” went? Down the drain, literally.

(The remainder of this article can be read at nbeaujon.com/abortion.htm )
 
Yep the consequences of evil never bears good fruit:nope:
 
Part of the reason social security isn’t working like it used to is because our elderly population is living longer. What was the average life span of a male or female when it was instituted?
 
Although its true people are living longer, but the fact of the matter is families are getting smaller and smaller.
 
40.png
kaymart:
Although its true people are living longer, but the fact of the matter is families are getting smaller and smaller.
Click to expand...
Contraception plus abortion killed social security. People are living longer; as a consequence the system would have been sounder had family size gradually increased. Instead, it decreased.
 
It is the result of a morally corupt society that is coming back to bite us where it hurts.
 
40.png
kaymart:
It is the result of a morally corupt society that is coming back to bite us where it hurts.
Click to expand...
I can forsee that squeeze on social security will likely put pressure on the old folks–who will start getting the message that they have a duty to die. And the state will be happy to help them along.
 
40.png
JimG:
I can forsee that squeeze on social security will likely put pressure on the old folks–who will start getting the message that they have a duty to die. And the state will be happy to help them along.
Click to expand...
I hope and pray not, but I see alot of anger and resentment among my peers against the older generations for the mess they see. And the part I think will also add up which I rarely hear about is the STD rates. About the time when the baby boomers start aging, droves of young people are going to be sick themselves from sinful lifestyles barring the discovery of technology or cures. Sad. Thanks and God Bless.
 
wjhii said:
Aborting the Golden Goose: Roe vs. Wade Killed Social Security

**The Real Demographical Time Bomb. **
by N. Beaujon
February 20, 2005

Abortion killed not only the viability of the fetus, it killed the viability of our social security, both literally and figuratively. Social security depends on the viability of future generations coming up from behind to support aging populations. Our Social Security system depends on the same.

When Social Security was created there were 16.5 persons employed per each retiree [1] and the majority of them were never expected to live beyond retirement age! (That was the subtle “beauty” of Roosevelt’s system.) Today that ratio has dwindled down to 3. By 2030, when the last of the baby boomers are expected to retire, there will be 2 employees carrying each retiree. [2]Where do you suppose all those “future employees” went? Down the drain, literally.

(The remainder of this article can be read at nbeaujon.com/abortion.htm )
Click to expand...

AMEN!:amen:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top