Abortion/Breast Cancer Coverup

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arlene_Alice
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Arlene_Alice

Guest
It has been known by scientists doing studies back in l957 on post-abortive Japanese women, that induced abortion raises the risk of acquiring breast cancer disease. 29 out of 38 international studies have been done since then to confirm this link. Dr. Joel Brind of Baruch College and his scientific team had published a meta-analysis confirming this link. There are six medical groups that confirm this link.

WHY AREN’T WOMEN BEING TOLD?

Please check out: www.AbortionBreastCancer.com , which is the most comprehensive resource on the Net, offering information regarding this issue.

In the “politically correct” climate of today, government agencies, cancer research organizations, health organizations, and the abortion industry have unethically and criminally covered up the ABC link.

38,000 American women die each year from breast cancer disease. 180,000 American women will be told by their doctors that they have breast cancer disease. It is most likely that these women are not told about the ABC link.

Do you think this coverup is ethical? Do you think women’s health concerns should be based on politics or sound medical research?
 
IMO–Alot of abortions are preformed during the teen years when young women are not concerning themselves with breast cancer yet. It is not unusual for young people to think they are indistructable or to not worry themselves about something that could happen 20 years from now. I smoked when I was a teen and just would not take the risk of cancer seriously. Thankfully, I smartened up by my early 20’s and gave it up.

Also, I have seen this topic debated on an Abortion Debate board. The pro-choicers aren’t buying it and they feel it is just a ploy brought on by pro-life to save more “unwanted” babies. So, if the almighty Planned Parenthood is poo pooing it, what’s to worry about. It is ridiculous. But, like they say you can lead a horse to water…:banghead:
 
There is another reason for the cover-up, one much less diabolical. The incedence of breast cancer increases at the same level for women who have spontanious abortions (miscarrages) at the same point in pregnancies. That said, many health care officials since they have no way to counter either the miscarrage or the breast cancer simply do not inform the women of it. This is a very minor reason, but one that many prolife doctors tell me as the reason that they do not generally discuss the matter
 
Arlene Alice:
It has been known by scientists doing studies back in l957…
Click to expand...
it is kinda hard to defend the lack of exposure of the nearly 50 years of research as something less than diabolical. as i understand it, that is how the tobacco industry is described for not trumpting the dangers of smoking despite having the information for about the same amount of time.
it makes you wonder why a dan rather or peter jennings hasn’t asked about it in any of the reports done on the abortion issue. it gets hard to not think there must be an agenda and that the agenda is more important than either people or truth.
i do try to not become way too cynical, it makes me want to give up on folks. i keep telling myself, tho’, that until *He *gives up, i have no right to even consider it. so i pray for strength to keep on keeping on.
thanks for listening, love and peace, terry
 
In my area, there is a high rate of breast cancer. A 10 year study was done with the focus on the environment. The results were released last year showing no link between the environment (i.e., dumped chemicals into the water table, air pollution, radon, lawn fertilizer, etc.).

No one ever mentions lifestyle. In an upper middle class area where nearly everyone has 2.3 children, you can deduce that either the birth control pill or abortion as birth control is a factor. Yet, this is NEVER mentioned even as a remote idea.

If the abortion/breast cancer link were laid on the table, I honestly believe that young women would think twice about promiscious behavior.
 
The problem with not discussing this because it occurs in miscarriages also is that women are getting medical procedures without a fully formed consent. Obviously women who have miscarriages can do nothing, but women who get abortions, should be made aware of the fact they are increasing the chances of breast cancer SIGNIFICANTLY. Women who have miscarriages should also understand the increased risk also to be more aware. Ignorance of consequences should never be preferred. It is a cop out by doctors, pure and simple.
 
Arlene Alice:
It has been known by scientists doing studies back in l957 on post-abortive Japanese women, that induced abortion raises the risk of acquiring breast cancer disease. 29 out of 38 international studies have been done since then to confirm this link. Dr. Joel Brind of Baruch College and his scientific team had published a meta-analysis confirming this link. There are six medical groups that confirm this link.

WHY AREN’T WOMEN BEING TOLD?

Please check out: www.AbortionBreastCancer.com , which is the most comprehensive resource on the Net, offering information regarding this issue.

In the “politically correct” climate of today, government agencies, cancer research organizations, health organizations, and the abortion industry have unethically and criminally covered up the ABC link.

38,000 American women die each year from breast cancer disease. 180,000 American women will be told by their doctors that they have breast cancer disease. It is most likely that these women are not told about the ABC link.

Do you think this coverup is ethical? Do you think women’s health concerns should be based on politics or sound medical research?
Click to expand...
Good Post. Breast Cancer used to be only an older woman’s disease in the US until contraception became rampant & abortion started in the 70’s.
 
What I find personally interesting in the miscarriage connection is that in my family of 4 sisters and 2 sister-in-laws only one of us, my sisters-in-law, had a miscarriage and she is the only one who has had breast cancer (at least so far). She faced this at the tender age of 37 with no evidence of breast cancer in her family. hmmm, something to ponder.
 
40.png
MariaG:
The problem with not discussing this because it occurs in miscarriages also is that women are getting medical procedures without a fully formed consent. Obviously women who have miscarriages can do nothing, but women who get abortions, should be made aware of the fact they are increasing the chances of breast cancer SIGNIFICANTLY. Women who have miscarriages should also understand the increased risk also to be more aware. Ignorance of consequences should never be preferred. It is a cop out by doctors, pure and simple.
Click to expand...
There has never been and will never be true informed consent before elective abortions in this country. If the Abortion doctors told the truth about all of it, including psychological problems, and also that in most states if an abortion goes wrong at an abortion mill an abulance will not be called to avoid high profile liability, many woman would pass. Too much money is made by these people.
 
:tiphat: Hi, I am new to the forums and noticed that there are many pro-life supporters here

I was wondering if you may consider going to the Abortion Debate Board at beliefne.com and show support to the other PL posters there?

Unfortunately, we are out numbered:( . At times we find it very frustrating:banghead: . There are some pretty hard-core pro-abortion supporters there. To top it off the web-site seems to be very liberal and the pcers get away with breaking the ROC of the web-site often.:mad: For example, there is a PL poster who is in the formation process to become a nun and she has been suspended from the boards. But, blatant PC ROC violators seem never to be suspended. You may be wondering why we just don’t give up but the lies and misinformation that flies around there is pretty hard to ignore.

The regular PLers there would love to get some fresh support. If you find the time maybe you could check it out. Thanks:thumbsup:
 
cove said:
:tiphat: Hi, I am new to the forums and noticed that there are many pro-life supporters here

I was wondering if you may consider going to the Abortion Debate Board at beliefne.com and show support to the other PL posters there?

Unfortunately, we are out numbered:( . At times we find it very frustrating:banghead: . There are some pretty hard-core pro-abortion supporters there. To top it off the web-site seems to be very liberal and the pcers get away with breaking the ROC of the web-site often.:mad: For example, there is a PL poster who is in the formation process to become a nun and she has been suspended from the boards. But, blatant PC ROC violators seem never to be suspended. You may be wondering why we just don’t give up but the lies and misinformation that flies around there is pretty hard to ignore.

The regular PLers there would love to get some fresh support. If you find the time maybe you could check it out. Thanks:thumbsup:
Click to expand...

Sounds good to me. Historically these boards always kick me off because I debate well for the Pro-Life viewpoint so I gave it up.
 
I need to correct that web-site it is— www.beliefnet.com.

Abortion Debate Board

You will find it in their discussion area. If you go to the bottom of their home page you will see where to click on “discussions”. That should bring you to all their boards.

Thanks again for considering this!
 
Dear Posters: I happen to serve on the Board of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer and know that, scientifically, MOST miscarriages are not linked to breast cancer disease. If you visited our web site, www.AbortionBreastCancer.com this fact is noted there…see below. Another covered-up link to breast cancer is the use of the Birth Control Pill, which also exposes women to heavy doses of Estrogen , having a “carcinogenic” response to breast tissues. Please help save lives by telling other women of our web site. Thank you. Arlene Alice
…
Biological Explanation for the Link

The explanation for the independent link makes good biological sense. It remains unrefuted and unchallenged by scientists because it is physiologically correct.

A never-pregnant woman has a network of primitive, immature and cancer-vulnerable breast cells which make up her milk glands. It is only in the third trimester of pregnancy - after 32 weeks gestation - that her cells start to mature and are fashioned into milk producing tissue whose cells are cancer resistant.

When a woman becomes pregnant, her breasts enlarge. This occurs because a hormone called estradiol, a type of estrogen, causes both the normal and pre-cancerous cells in the breast to multiply terrifically. This process is called “proliferation.” By 7 to 8 weeks gestation, the estradiol level has increased by 500% over what it was at the time of conception.

If the pregnancy is carried to term, a second process called “differentiation” takes place. Differentiation is the shaping of cells into milk producing tissue. It shuts off the cell multiplication process. This takes place at approximately 32 weeks gestation.

If the pregnancy is aborted, the woman is left with more undifferentiated – and therefore cancer-vulnerable cells – than she had before she was pregnant. On the other hand, a full term pregnancy leaves a woman with more milk producing differentiated cells, which means that she has fewer cancer-vulnerable cells in her breasts than she did before the pregnancy.

In contrast, research has shown that most miscarriages do not raise breast cancer risk. This is due to a lack of estrogen overexposure. Miscarriages are frequently precipitated by a decline in the production of progesterone which is needed to maintain a pregnancy. Estrogen is made from progesterone, so the levels of each hormone rise and fall together during pregnancy.

For a thorough biological explanation of the abortion-breast cancer link, see this second website for the Breast Cancer Prevention Institute, www.BCPInstitute.org and click on its online booklet, “Breast Cancer Risks and Prevention.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top