Abortion Has Caused 300K Breast Cancer Deaths Since Roe

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Found this on Susan G. Komen for the Cure website - a nonprofit organization that accepts money for curing cancer and then gives money to Planned Parenthood. Between 2003 and 2008, SGK gave $3 million to Planned Parenthood. In Fiscal Year 2008 alone, Planned Parenthood got $805,000 from SGK.

"Additionally, the son of the founder of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation is in a joint business venture with Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest.

Located in Washington state, PPGNW holds a 12.5 percent share of the Metro Centre mall in Peoria, Ill., where Nancy Goodman Brinker’s son Eric Brinker maintains “controlling interest.”

gerardnadal.com/2010/04/07/susan-g-komen-gives-million-to-planned-parenthood/

ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/BreastCancerRiskFactorsTable.html

Abortion

Although there has been some debate in the past about the link between abortion and breast cancer risk, research now strongly supports no link between the two [390]. Since 2003, the National Cancer Institute’s Board of Scientific Advisors and Board of Scientific Counselors, as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have agreed that the scientific evidence does not support a link between abortion and breast cancer [391-392].

The importance of study design for research on abortion and breast cancer risk

Some case-control studies have suggested that abortion may increase the risk of breast cancer [393]. However, the nature of case-control studies makes the accuracy of their results questionable. Case-control studies rely on the reporting of past behavior. When it comes to a sensitive topic like abortion, this can have a big impact on the information gathered. The cases in these studies (the women with breast cancer) may be much more likely to give complete information about their abortion history than the controls (the women without breast cancer). Such differences in reporting can bias study results.

Prospective cohort studies are much more likely to give accurate results on the topic of abortion. These studies gather sensitive information before women are diagnosed with breast cancer. This helps limit biased reporting. The results from cohort studies clearly show that abortion does not increase the risk of breast cancer [391,394-401].
 
Barbkw said:
Found this on for the Cure website - a nonprofit organization that accepts money for curing cancer and then gives money to Planned Parenthood. Between 2003 and 2008, SGK gave $3 million to Planned Parenthood. In Fiscal Year 2008 alone, Planned Parenthood got $805,000 from SGK.

"Additionally, the son of the founder of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation is in a joint business venture with Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest.

Located in Washington state, PPGNW holds a 12.5 percent share of the Metro Centre mall in Peoria, Ill., where Nancy Goodman Brinker’s son Eric Brinker maintains “controlling interest.”

gerardnadal.com/2010/04/07/susan-g-komen-gives-million-to-planned-parenthood/

ww5.komen.org/BreastCancer/BreastCancerRiskFactorsTable.html

Abortion

Although there has been some debate in the past about the link between abortion and breast cancer risk, research now strongly supports no link between the two [390]. Since 2003, the National Cancer Institute’s Board of Scientific Advisors and Board of Scientific Counselors, as well as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have agreed that the scientific evidence does not support a link between abortion and breast cancer [391-392].

The importance of study design for research on abortion and breast cancer risk

Some case-control studies have suggested that abortion may increase the risk of breast cancer [393]. However, the nature of case-control studies makes the accuracy of their results questionable. Case-control studies rely on the reporting of past behavior. When it comes to a sensitive topic like abortion, this can have a big impact on the information gathered. The cases in these studies (the women with breast cancer) may be much more likely to give complete information about their abortion history than the controls (the women without breast cancer). Such differences in reporting can bias study results.

Prospective cohort studies are much more likely to give accurate results on the topic of abortion. These studies gather sensitive information before women are diagnosed with breast cancer. This helps limit biased reporting. The results from cohort studies clearly show that abortion does not increase the risk of breast cancer [391,394-401].
Click to expand...
Which is why I never give any money to the Susan G. Komen foundation and discouraged everyone I know from doing so. As the old Arab proverb goes when you sleep with dogs you get fleas
 
… of course they are going to say abortion does not risk breast cancer. They are trying to make money, so any negative consequences and reports against abortion are bad and they do everything they can to silence them.

They have been known to tell women everything will be fine and it will be as if they never had an abortion. This is also far from the truth, as more and more women are coming forward to say they regret their abortions and talk about the emotional pain they’ve been in ever since, sometimes even before the abortion actually happened (the people lie and tell them it’s too late to change their mind).

Honestly, even if it doesn’t increase breast cancer, abortion is far from harmless and far from health care. It does not help women and actually keeps them in danger (risky sexual behavior, rape, suicide, depression, etc.).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top