Abortion & Porn Hold That Preeminence

  • Thread starter Thread starter francisca.chapter3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ad homien attack. Answer is no. So i see you ran out of an argument if you have to make personal attacks.
 
Facepalm! You gave ted bundy as your example (one man), so i gave me and watching violent movies as my example (one man). Last time i checked sample size of one does equal sample size of one. If you continue trying to ad homien me i will flag you and move on from conversation. Because this is pointless.
 
Not entirely sure about being troll, although not dismissing it out of hand.
 
I feel sleepy now boys. Please continue the party. Thankyou for the data discussion. I still think my data is valid.
 
Its been that constant pattern - changing topic once has no response, quoting post fragments, taking the post fragments out of context, misrepresenting their own posts, etc etc.

and last but not least - checking out once people are onto the trolling
I feel sleepy now boys
 
Last edited:
@Aquinas11, your right I broke the number one internet rule. Packing up the food (in a sense) and moving somewhere else.
 
Definitely could be. Although the early ones were more just fractured English. And do trolls usually announce that they are exiting? [ETA: but I am exiting as well anyway…]
 
Last edited:
Here is citations that shows the youtube video Ted Bundy last interview with Dr James Dobson (my post #46) worth a second look.

Micro-level media effectsEdit​

The following are salient examples of media effects studies which examine media influence on individuals.

Third-personEdit​

Individuals often mistakenly believe that they are less susceptible to media effects than others. About fifty percent of the members in a given sample are susceptible to the third-person effect, underestimating their degree of influence.[[25]]

PrimingEdit​

In media effects studies, priming is how exposure to media can alter an individual’s attitudes, behaviors, or beliefs. Most media violence research, a popular area of discussion in media effects studies, theorizes that exposure to violent acts may prime an individual to behave more aggressively while the activation lingers.[1]
 
Last edited:

Social learningEdit​

Miller and Dollard (1941) pioneered social learning theory by their findings that individuals do not need to personally act out a behavior to learn it; they can learn from observation.[29] Bandura (1977) expanded upon this concept, stating that audiences can learn behaviors from observing fictitious characters.[30]

Media violenceEdit​

The effects of media violence
(Video game controversies - Wikipedia).

(Payne Fund Studies - Wikipedia)

Seduction of the Innocent*

(Influence of mass media - Wikipedia)

Behavioral effects include disinhibition, imitation and desensitization.
  1. Disinhibition, a theory that exposure to violent media may legitimize the use of violence, has found support in many carefully controlled experiments. Men exposed to violent pornography behave more aggressively towards women in certain circumstances.[32]
  2. Imitation theory states individuals may learn violence from television characters. Bandura’s Bobo doll experiment, along with other research, seems to indicate correlation even when controlling for individual differences.[33]
  3. Desensitization refers to an individual’s habituation to violence through exposure to violent media content, resulting in real-life implications. Studies have covered both television and video game violence.[34] Desensitization has become an issue with Hollywood adaptations in regard to crimes. It is very easy for a movie to become caught up in making its films look artistic that they begin to make their audiences indifferent to the true horror that is taking place on screen.[35]
Cognitive effects include an increased belief of potential violence in the real world from watching violent media content, leading to anxiety about personal safety.[36]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top