L
Lazerlike42
Guest
A friend of mine is in a philosophy class where they are analyzing the Bible as literature. I know it sounds off but it’s not that bad. In any event, it is still off as I said, and the professor has asked the class to answer this question for the morning:
What is the essential different between the situation with Noah and the flood, and the situation with Abram and Sodom and Gomorrah?
She asked for help. I told her that the essential difference is that in the first case, Noah helps God, and God destroys His enemies. In the second, God helps Abram, and Abram destroys his enemies. In other words, in one case man helps God in destroying God’s enemies, and in the other God helps man in destroying man’s enemies. That seems clear. However, I have the feeling he is going to introduce some challenge, try to find something wrong with this, or prove some point.
If anyone can speculate on what he might try to make of this, that would be greatly appreciated. I’d like to be able to warn her ahead of time and give her a defense. Thanks!
What is the essential different between the situation with Noah and the flood, and the situation with Abram and Sodom and Gomorrah?
She asked for help. I told her that the essential difference is that in the first case, Noah helps God, and God destroys His enemies. In the second, God helps Abram, and Abram destroys his enemies. In other words, in one case man helps God in destroying God’s enemies, and in the other God helps man in destroying man’s enemies. That seems clear. However, I have the feeling he is going to introduce some challenge, try to find something wrong with this, or prove some point.
If anyone can speculate on what he might try to make of this, that would be greatly appreciated. I’d like to be able to warn her ahead of time and give her a defense. Thanks!