J
JayMekk
Guest
Forbid it’s people to eat food blessed by idols, and also communion from other churches because they believe other churches are inspired by demons, would that count as contradicting 1 Timothy 4 3?
Contradicting in what way?Forbid it’s people to eat food blessed by idols, and also communion from other churches because they believe other churches are inspired by demons, would that count as contradicting 1 Timothy 4 3?
Well, here is Timothy 4:3 from the Douay-Rheims:Contradicting in what way?
Is this your only hang up with the International Church of Christ? Just from a brief skim of their beliefs I see many other things would be cause for much more alarm at least for me. Building on the whole “every other church has been inspired by demons idea” you put forward, the ICOC believes its the one true church. It appears they claim, as a few other churches do, that after the 1st century Christianity fell off the right path, and that they just recently have arisen to restore original Christianity 2000 years later. A study of the Early Church Fathers would seem to me to show this claim falls flat.I’m a member of ICOC and trying to figure out if it’s church is truly correct. They forbid it’s members from eating food that’s been blessed by other Gods, such as hallall meat or other gods, saying its against the bibles teachings and is sin. They also say that every other church has been inspired by demons, so when you eat communion by them, you are eating ‘communion’ blessed by demons, is this forbidding of food scriptural? Or does it relate to 1 Timothy 4:3?
What other beliefs of theirs gives you alarm?Is this your only hang up with the International Church of Christ? Just from a brief skim of their beliefs I see many other things would be cause for much more alarm at least for me. Building on the whole “every other church has been inspired by demons idea” you put forward, the ICOC believes its the one true church. It appears they claim, as a few other churches do, that after the 1st century Christianity fell off the right path, and that they just recently have arisen to restore original Christianity 2000 years later. A study of the Early Church Fathers would seem to me to show this claim falls flat.