Account: "Boyfriend ‘squeamish’ about dating an abortionist but doesn’t say why."

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it is normal for a person to be uneasy about being romantically involved with someone committing murder.
 
I thought that many abortionists at clinics are not “great” doctors as they fight tooth and nail against the requirement to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals.

I’m surprised to read a brand new medical school graduate would voluntarily choose this area of practice.
 
I think that one of the possible answers that ‘Prudence’ gives, really hits it on the head: it’s one thing to say “as a matter of principle, I think abortions should be available” and quite another to be faced with the reality of them on a constant and personal basis. Maybe he’s not quite so “pro-abortion” as he thinks he is; maybe he just bought into the tripe that he should be pro-abortion if he wants to think of himself as a modern, progressive, woke kind of guy, but never thought it through sufficiently to know what he signed up for…
 
I wonder about the discussion relating to, “So how was work today?” “Oh we had X uh,… er… “cases”, it was (insert your choice word here)
How about introductions, “This is my spouse, he/she an abortionist.” awkward silence
I enjoy how they phrase the, “squeamish” and “but doesn’t say why” bit. Are men supposed to be “manly” when it comes to killing in the womb? A life is being ended at the hands of another. It is serious.
You see right up front what her views are. No guess-work needed.
I could not imagine a couple living this way. She/he caresses you, and you think about what other actions those same hands did on that day. They of course are just fine with it. That is why I would say deal-breaker.
Dominus vobiscum
 
Last edited:
Yes, I would also feel squeamish dating a hitman, because that is really all an abortionist is.

I bet he might feel in the back of his mind that she would have no problem whatsoever ending the life of his own child that he has with her if she decides that it is inconvenient.
 
Interesting choice when the oath includes, “do no harm” huh. Maybe like taking “under God” out of the pledge of allegiance, they just leave that bit out.
Dominus vobiscum
redbetta said:
I bet he might feel in the back of his mind that she would have no problem whatsoever ending the life of his own child that he has with her if she decides that it is inconvenient.
Click to expand...
“Zactly!”
 
Last edited:
From experience, I will tell you that medical training is desensitizing and dehumanizing. Maybe this is necessary, in a way.

You start dissecting frogs, then sharks, then fetal pigs, then, finally, human cadavers.

Then you progress to vivisection. Nephrectomies on living dogs, etc.

Eventually, you are performing all kinds of bloody, but necessary, procedures on humans. You try to inflict as little pain as possible…but, sometimes, in emergencies, the life-saving procedure overrules concerns with pain.

Physicians must recover their humanity and sensitivity somewhere along the way, usually after training is completed. Very rarely, one will get lost and turn sadistic.

I have a concern about a physician who wants to make a career of destroying innocent human life. Adopting such a path will eventually destroy that physician, herself, spiritually. She may even become demonized through performing all those murders.

Do you really want to spend life sleeping with such a killer?
 
I would rather date someone who worked at a CIA black ops detention center. At least there MIGHT be some sort of service there for humanity.
 
Agnus-Dei said:
Interesting choice when the oath includes, “do no harm” huh. Maybe like taking “under God” out of the pledge of allegiance, they just leave that bit out.
Dominus vobiscum
Click to expand...
Tell that to Ralph Northam, M.D., Governor of Virginia. He wants to “take an even bigger bite from life”…if the baby happens to be delivered live, neglect it until dead.

Since you enjoy Latin, the exact dictum taught to new medical students is Primum non nocere
The first rule of medical practice: "First of all, do no harm."
 
GodIsPerfection said:
neglect it until dead
Click to expand...
Heard about that and was more than disgusted. Goes with the talk of “leaving the baby in a storage room to expire”. The office did not even want a person to hold the baby while they died. Who’s job was it to check I have no idea. This world has some completely sick, twisted, and evil people in it, and I have no idea how this can be overcome.
Dominus vobiscum
 
Last edited:
Agnus-Dei said:
One big reason I wonder why they are even termed “physicians” at all.
Dominus vobiscum
Click to expand...
This brings up an interesting point. The Hippocratic Oath, from the 5th Century BC in Greece forbade physicians from performing abortions, because this was a sort of labor union exclusion. Others, presumably midwives, could perform abortions in ancient Greece. The oath did not have the moral implications in ancient Greek society, as a whole, that it evolved into with modern physicians.

Modern physicians, as a “life profession” were unified in eschewing performing abortions until 1964 when Roe vs Wade effectively split physicians into two moral camps. Although everyone still wore the white coat, the spiritual split disunited physicians into lifesavers and death-dealers. This spiritual split has cost the profession and society dearly.

I have always wondered if abortionists should be permitted to wear the white coat trappings of the life-dedicated medical profession? IF wholesale murder is to be permitted, perhaps abortionists should have their own union and professional uniform, as in ancient Greece.

Might I suggest a black woolen tunic, breeches, and jackboots, with some lightning bolts on the collar lapels, and a skull on the black visor cap? Margaret Sanger would certainly approve!

P.S.: Don’t forget the armband.
 
Last edited:
Pick something else please, I like black wool tunic type things. Benedictines do too.
I have great difficulty understanding how anyone, can look at a baby, see it, and allow it to die when they have the power to preserve it’s life. This isn’t about zygote this or trimester that. It is a baby for God’s sake. What is the world’s problem?
Dominus vobiscum
 
Yup, I’m aware.
What makes this strange for me is that I generally try to stay away from this issue. My life choice has 0% chance of participating in a pregnancy. I usually feel as if it is “not my decision to make” because of that. But seeing a live baby, I would get into trouble by trying to get help somewhere. Demented thing there is that “I” would be the one breaking the law. That is sick.
Dominus vobiscum
 
Last edited:
Same spirit as abortionists. Embracing cruelty, murder, and death dealing as virtues.

I love Catholic monks and the Benedictines! Totally different!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top