I disagree, Dale. I think the Anglican Communion will indeed recognize the ACNA. If they don’t, they risk alienating many bishops worldwide who already personally endorse the new province. Men like Gregory Venables, who is the Archbishop of the Southern Cone, Orombi, Akinola, and a whole list of high-profile bishops and archbishops endorse ACNA personally but like GKC said, it is a corporate acceptance that must unfold. Rowan Williams is angry at what transpired at Anaheim and the TEC is steadily drawing the ire of many parts of the communion, alienating themselves. The ACNA has so many groups that came together to form it like CANA, AMIA, and several big dioceses with high-profile, well-respected bishops like Jack Iker, Schofield, Duncan, Ackerman (retired), and it drew endorsements from guys like Metropolitan Jonah and Rick Warren, etc.
I think the AC has no choice but to endorse them. However, my question honestly is WHY AND WHO CARES if the Anglican Communion doesn’t? Why does ACNA want the acceptance of the communion? Rowan Williams is the laughing stock of most of these conservative bishops. The Church of England allows women priests and bishops and is soft on the gay issue. Everyone knows that. They have been a liberal entity with little evangelism or drive/motivation for the last fifty years. The office of the ABC is a figurehead and a poor one at that in the last twenty years. The only reason they’re seeking such acceptance is tradition and the feeling that they can’t exist without this relationship to the ABC…In so many ways the ABC is a clone of the TEC just not quite as far gone. I just don’t see why ACNA doesn’t just exist, be content to exist, and enter into relationships with provinces with which it sees eye to eye. To heck with the Anglican Communion and the need to be accepted into it?