M
Mr.Ruggerio
Guest
Just wondering what others thought about this—
The Cathecism calls man’s fall (the original sin) a “primeval event” that took place at the beginning of the history of man.
Assuming you believe that the universe is about 12 billion years old and that man did not appear on the scene until about the last 100,000 years or so (ignore the evolution versus creation debate), then given the account of the fall of man in Genesis, doesn’t that mean all of creation has been in a state of “paradise” or uncursed, except only for the very last 1/12,000 of the universe’s age? The time since the fall represents a mere fraction of the age of the universe.
Scientists already know much about the nature of the universe looking back billions of year. The photographs of the universe looking back in time are remarkable and beautiful.
What does the fact that the vast majority of the universe’s time (time we now see through our scientific instruments) occurred prior to the fall say about the nature of the fall. Isn’t this in accord with the acount in Genesis, in which man did not appear on the scene until late in the sixth day? Did creation itself change radically only 100,00 years ago and if so has science found evidence of some such change in its studies of the universe?
Also, does the beauty of the photographs of deep space, looking back millions, even billions, of years prior to the fall, give us some hint of the beauty we lost as a result of the fall?
Just a thought. Looking for feedback.
The Cathecism calls man’s fall (the original sin) a “primeval event” that took place at the beginning of the history of man.
Assuming you believe that the universe is about 12 billion years old and that man did not appear on the scene until about the last 100,000 years or so (ignore the evolution versus creation debate), then given the account of the fall of man in Genesis, doesn’t that mean all of creation has been in a state of “paradise” or uncursed, except only for the very last 1/12,000 of the universe’s age? The time since the fall represents a mere fraction of the age of the universe.
Scientists already know much about the nature of the universe looking back billions of year. The photographs of the universe looking back in time are remarkable and beautiful.
What does the fact that the vast majority of the universe’s time (time we now see through our scientific instruments) occurred prior to the fall say about the nature of the fall. Isn’t this in accord with the acount in Genesis, in which man did not appear on the scene until late in the sixth day? Did creation itself change radically only 100,00 years ago and if so has science found evidence of some such change in its studies of the universe?
Also, does the beauty of the photographs of deep space, looking back millions, even billions, of years prior to the fall, give us some hint of the beauty we lost as a result of the fall?
Just a thought. Looking for feedback.