S
swanlinnet
Guest
If drug addiction is an illness, then is ‘society’ justified in sending to prison a person who is compelled to commit ‘crime’ by this ‘illness’.
A man, for instance, leaps from a tower block in flames. He is compelled to do so by fear. In doing so he lands upon a pedestrian and injures him. It is called by the courts a tragic accident. In other words, he is justified by the court in injuring the pedestrian.
Yet a drug addict compelled by the same impulse of fear from withdrawal goes out and breaks the law and is sent to prison .
Where does freedom of the will end and where does compulsion and, indeed, culpability begin ?
Thank you, Vince![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
A man, for instance, leaps from a tower block in flames. He is compelled to do so by fear. In doing so he lands upon a pedestrian and injures him. It is called by the courts a tragic accident. In other words, he is justified by the court in injuring the pedestrian.
Yet a drug addict compelled by the same impulse of fear from withdrawal goes out and breaks the law and is sent to prison .
Where does freedom of the will end and where does compulsion and, indeed, culpability begin ?
Thank you, Vince
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)