We can excuse ourselves promptly, which of course raises eyebrows in the least, but could bring about some cold shoulders in an otherwise healthy friendship. Such are the sacrifices of those who do Christ’s will.
But I can see some purpose in staying. Because the subject is held in dignity in God’s eyes, and because he is protected by Divine justice, we are to become his advocate. He is part of an extended family. We care for his well being, even when guilty. We wait anxiously for his shedding of the Old Man.
Determine if the information was obtained under the umbrella of secrecy, in which case we use the former option. “Did you hear what Mary said to her lawyer”, “Did you hear what John heard while he was in the confessional”. Make it a point. Presume the positive to counter the negative. “Henry, did you hear that Pierre has a record for stealing?” “Can’t really say, but I heard he did some honest and accurate work in accounting, so to me it doesn’t make sense.” Positives may not prevent the next time he gossips, but now conscience has something to work on in him. We hope he will come away with something to think about next time.
We are not siding by doing this. Ask the informer the subject’s side of his story. If possible, leave it in the air that there is a stalemate, or a possible valid explanation, then leave. “Yeah I heard the case, but there were mitigating circumstances not considered.”
I recall in the early years of aids, a newspaper tormented a prostitute who was HIV positive. The writer of the article had her followed her around and her associates to find the latest scoop on her which he printed. Then one day he happened to mention she had a 4 year son. This was to have an effect of further revulsion, but to me it was horror. I imagined the future and could see him leaving his mother later by the scandal. Her last hope and friend.
This is also gossip in classification, the unknowing party an infant. I called the editor and asked for the sake of the child to stop the story. He agreed.
Scandal is the worst thing I see around I think, and that includes Institutional Scandal. Even when decades have past, and new generations come, it would seem that a lingering foul smell of the story still permeates. It’s the worst of the human faults I think. The New Man spoken of by Paul is a joke. The objective of scandal is to ensure the person’s back stepping to correct his ways are blocked by every obstacle. Every attempt to assist him reenter the Community is blocked. Like a game of snakes and ladders, he finds his gains are temporary, and has him starting anew by the repetitive cycles of failures.