B
baltobetsy
Guest
If you’re still worried about this after two months, it might be prudent to consider whether this perfectionism might be a manifestation of pride. The humble person makes a mistake and gets over it.
Perhaps that’s the reason why it should be.Our priest said that under the Traditional Latin Mass, a priest who didn’t celebrate each detail of the Mass was committing mortal sin. I can’t remember the exact total number of mortal sins possible he mentioned, but it was in the high numbers, 80’s.
(Perhap’s the reason why the Latin Mass is not being welcomed back.)
Very good!I hope the concelebrants were not incensed that they were not censed!![]()
The OP is not under the USCCB, he his under the Archdiocese of Singapore.As I said, they have asked. It does make sense. Few young men doing a worthy service want to be described as “boys” any more, and if a parish that just happens to only have boys as servers calls them “altar boys”, it sounds parochial. The term “altar server” more accurately describes the situation in the whole of the Roman Catholic world. It is worth checking to find out which term your bishop uses, and teaching the young people assisting your priests at Mass to use that one.
Very good!
Anyone who has not altar served might not be aware of the pressure that one is under when up there where Jesus Christ is being made present. If there is one place in all of space and time where it is appropriate to be a perfectionist, the liturgy of the Mass is it. I’ve done some public speaking but it’s different at the altar - there is something about it - especially for someone who has been in the pew his whole life. Sometimes I bring the bowl and flagon for the priest to purify his hands and being so close to the altar, seeing the bread and wine sitting there on the altar carefully arranged by the priest just moments before being turned into Christs body and blood, the sight of it actually scares me and I have to fight back emotion as I’m up there. I think, who am I to be so close?
I used to envy the altar servers when we had the old Mass. They would be holding the hem of the priest’s chasuble at the Consecration. As a female, I could never do that. I thought how wonderful that they had that connection to Jesus’ coming down. Almost as good as the woman who was healed when she touched the hem of Jesus" garment in the gospels.
Server is the term used in Canon law for those laity performing the duties of instituted acolytes but without the institution into the order of instituted acolytes.The OP is not under the USCCB, he his under the Archdiocese of Singapore.
I hope the concelebrants were not incensed that they were not censed!![]()
As my previous Assoc. Pastor says, “There are no mistakes in Liturgy.”Oh, has any one of you come across serving errors as altar boys?
Perhaps the old Latin Mass placed way too much emphasis on silly little rituals that had absolutely nothing to do with the original Mass. Forgetting to follow the rite to the letter a sin? That’s abhorrent considering the point of the Mass isn’t to perfectly follow a ritual, but to but allow the Eucharist to transform the community into one body, more specifically, the Body of Christ.Perhaps that’s the reason why it should be.
The rite and the Sacred Liturgy is greater than one priest and his quirks. He should simply follow the rubics, respecting the venerable Roman Rite. To do that is humbling, otherwise it turns into the priest’s personal attempts at being relevant. The ‘rituals’ as you disparagingly call them are essential to the Holy Sacrifice, they are done for a reason.Perhaps the old Latin Mass placed way too much emphasis on silly little rituals that had absolutely nothing to do with the original Mass. Forgetting to follow the rite to the letter a sin? That’s abhorrent considering the point of the Mass isn’t to perfectly follow a ritual, but to but allow the Eucharist to transform the community into one body, more specifically, the Body of Christ.
Rites change. God doesn’t. Don’t forget the REASON for Mass. Don’t let the parts of a rite cloud the true meaning and true experience. To place so much emphasis on the rite and whether or not someone forgot to do something is to do God a disservice by focusing more on the rite than on the community being one with Him.
While we should not be legalistic (and only legalistic) at our approach to the Mass, this seems like a excuse for making “pastoral” excuses to directly disobey church documents. I’ve heard similar arguments used many times.Perhaps the old Latin Mass placed way too much emphasis on silly little rituals that had absolutely nothing to do with the original Mass. Forgetting to follow the rite to the letter a sin? That’s abhorrent considering the point of the Mass isn’t to perfectly follow a ritual, but to but allow the Eucharist to transform the community into one body, more specifically, the Body of Christ.
Rites change. God doesn’t. Don’t forget the REASON for Mass. Don’t let the parts of a rite cloud the true meaning and true experience. To place so much emphasis on the rite and whether or not someone forgot to do something is to do God a disservice by focusing more on the rite than on the community being one with Him.