An Analogy between Christ’s Holy Shroud and Divine Revelation

  • Thread starter Thread starter anon48198893
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
One of the many protocols that the British Museum violated in 1988 was their obligation to share the raw C-14 data from the Shroud with another institution for the statistical analysis of that evidence.

Can you point out where they signed such a protocol, or violated it?
The setting for the radiocarbon dating of the Shroud
Emanuela Marinelli 2012

pg. 7 “The representatives of the laboratories . . .committed themselves . . .to send data to Tite and the ‘G. Colonnetti’ Institute of Turin for statistical analysis.”

pg. 8 “On completion of the measurements, the laboratories will send their data to Tite and to the Institute of Metrology ‘G. Colonnetti’ in Turin for preliminary statistical analysis.”

pg. 13 “The agreements taken in London in January are completely disregarded. Not only the laboratories did not complete the measures within three months and did not maintain confidentiality, but they did not even send the data to the ‘Colonnetti’ Institute in Turin for the statistical analysis.”

pg. 15 “The British Museum … . will include a full-size replica of the Shroud among forgeries in the exhibition Fake? The Art of Deception, held from March 9 to September 2, 1990.”

pg. 15 “Gonella accuses the laboratories of ‘intoxication by success’ and adds: ‘Misconducts there were tons. The colleagues of the C-14 (labs) behaved in a disgusting manner. Those scientists have hatched a true plot to discredit the Shroud.’”

“Gonella explains: 'It was blackmail. They put us up against the wall just with blackmail. Either we accepted the test of C-14 on the terms imposed by the laboratories, or it would break out a campaign of accusations saying the Church fears the truth and is an enemy of science.”

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top