An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth....a positive appraoch,

  • Thread starter Thread starter caesarjbsquitti
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

caesarjbsquitti

Guest
As an observer of modern day philosophy, I see some flaws.
  1. Words have lost their meaning. Part of the immoral agenda.
  2. Black and white Thinking. This is a key flaw in polarized thinking…they are all bad, and we are all good. There is good and bad in all groups…even beginning with the angels.
  3. Generalized logic. Most becomes all. Since most abusers are male, based on manipulating stats and definitions, then all men are abusers. Appears to be based on a paranoid type of thinking reflective of “cult-feminists”
  4. Negative approach.
Let us look at the statement 'an eye for an eye…a tooth for a tooth"…well in the negative approach we see this as meaning vengeance and as Ghadi was quoted as saying…'we will end up with a many blind and toothless people…"

However there is a positive side to interpreting this phrase.

That is if someone loses an eye or a tooth, society should pay to correct his or her loss…as best as possible.

Today if someone ‘loses a tooth’ society tries to find the person responsible, and legal aid gets thousands of dollars to defend the accused…the victims are forgotten…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top