S
StrawberryJam
Guest
Demonic Possession seems to get a lot of attention around here. It’s rare to hear of Angelic Possession. Is it possible? If so, is it exactly like Demonic possession? If it happens, is it moral and ethical?
I’ve never heard of such a thing. There are examples of demonic possession in the New Testament, but never an “angelic” possession. Angels have often acted as messengers, but I’ve never heard of any possession by good angels. Demons are angels too…they follow Lucifier instead of God, and they want your eternal destruction. -BHMDemonic Possession seems to get a lot of attention around here. It’s rare to hear of Angelic Possession. Is it possible? If so, is it exactly like Demonic possession? If it happens, is it moral and ethical?
The end result would still leave the person without free will.God wills that humans should be free to exercise their will. Allowing an angel to take possession of a human would be contrary to the will of God. Hence, angels do not possess.
The devil, however, is hell-bent on subverting humans to do his bidding. Hence demons can and do possess.
The end result of a demonic possession? Yes. However, demons only enter a person when that person gives an invitation. The person’s exposition to demonic influence is an act of human free will–which is why God would permit it to happen.The end result would still leave the person without free will.
Evil can’t be an outside force.The end result of a demonic possession? Yes. However, demons only enter a person when that person gives an invitation. The person’s exposition to demonic influence is an act of human free will–which is why God would permit it to happen.
Why not?Evil can’t be an outside force.
Evil has been working overtime since lucifer and company rebelled.If it is, it was working overtime during the Middle Ages and has been on a long vacation ever since just popping in and out here and there to check on the old haunts I suppose.
Of course, this makes sense because what people thought were possessions were most likely due to natural causes that medical doctors can diagnose properly now.
I have not, nor am I putting down the catholic religion that did NOT “create” science. I am so sick of hearing that here. I recognize the scientific contributions by catholics, but not false statements.Why not?
Evil has been working overtime since lucifer and company rebelled.
There is more demand for exorcism than ever before. Every exorcist, when possible, consults a physician and psychologist to rule out any natural cause for the phenomenon.
Do you understand that you are putting down the religion that created science?
There are far fewer exorcists in practice than doctors. Also, the Church will not exorcise unless the person involved has been checked medically and psychologically for a possible natural cause to their affliction.I have not, nor am I putting down the catholic religion that did NOT “create” science. I am so sick of hearing that here. I recognize the scientific contributions by catholics, but not false statements.
I don’t care what the demand for excorcisms are now. That does not prove that more are happening now then before.
If you have a short supply of exorcists, and a shorter supply of people who can get to a doctor for treatment, you could end up with the illusion there are more excorcisms being done now than in the past. I want to see a case where a doctor got to see the so called possessed person.
What kinds of examples do we have of people that have afflictions that are not treatable by the medical community, but treatable by the priest?There are far fewer exorcists in practice than doctors. Also, the Church will not exorcise unless the person involved has been checked medically and psychologically for a possible natural cause to their affliction.
ICXC NIKA
Fr. Roger Bacon. Fr. Nicholas Copernicus. Br. Gregor Mendel. Louis Pasteur. Msgr. Georges Lemaitre. Many more.I have not, nor am I putting down the catholic religion that did NOT “create” science.
If all exorcisms (A) require a doctor’s evaluation (B) the number of B is greater or equal to the number of A.If you have a short supply of exorcists, and a shorter supply of people who can get to a doctor for treatment, you could end up with the illusion there are more excorcisms being done now than in the past.
Due to the doctor-patient / clergy-penitent privileges you will not be able to do so.I want to see a case where a doctor got to see the so called possessed person.
Here you go. And no.What kinds of examples do we have of people that have afflictions that are not treatable by the medical community, but treatable by the priest?
Is it only christians who get possessed?
Your reply does not in any way show us that the Catholic Church “created” science. You simply list some scientists, and that is all you do.Fr. Roger Bacon. Fr. Nicholas Copernicus. Br. Gregor Mendel. Louis Pasteur. Msgr. Georges Lemaitre. Many more.
And by denying their contributions and those of the Church which educated and financed them, you are doing the very thing you deny doing.
If all exorcisms (A) require a doctor’s evaluation (B) the number of B is greater or equal to the number of A.
Due to the doctor-patient / clergy-penitent privileges you will not be able to do so.
No. I said:Your reply does not in any way show us that the Catholic Church “created” science. You simply list some scientists, and that is all you do.
Notice the bold part.And by denying their contributions and those of the Church which educated and financed them, you are doing the very thing you deny doing.
No. And many of the reviewing physicians used by the exorcists are atheists.Do the alleged demon possessed have to seek medical treatment from a doctor chosen for them by the church?
Or maybe, evil HAS been working overtime now, but through inner corruption, rather then exterior attack. It’s a great war strategy - convince the enemy that you don’t exist. Why would Satan go to the trouble of proving to everyone that he exists, since that would lead to more people believing in God. Rather, convince people that sin is not sin, and he has the war won.Evil can’t be an outside force.
If it is, it was working overtime during the Middle Ages and has been on a long vacation ever since just popping in and out here and there to check on the old haunts I suppose.
Of course, this makes sense because what people thought were possessions were most likely due to natural causes that medical doctors can diagnose properly now.
Angels who “embody” have not taken over the bodies of human beings. They use their power over our senses to assume a form we can see.It could be speculate that an angel somehow 'possessed a body." If the 2 angels in Genesis are not God, then perhaps this is what occurred since angels are not supposed to have physical form, unless they somehow temporarily materialized a body, or they only appear to have one. This also seems the case with the story of Tobias
However, our guardian angel is not supposed to be able to take over our mind…so I am not certain