Any other visions besides Mary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter itullian
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

itullian

Guest
Have the Saints or Jesus or any other heavenly figures appeared?

Any church approved?

Why do you think it’s mostly, if not always, Mary?

thank you
 
Except for those in scripture all visions are private revelation not required to be believed by the faithful. That said, the Lord Himself has appeared to numerous saints. The one that comes to mind, for me, is Saint Mary Faustina Kowalska who the Lord appeared to many times when He shared about Divine Mercy.
 
St. John Vianney saw St. Philomena.

There are countless such descriptions of the Communion of Saints interacting with the faithful.
 
Appeared to St. Margaret Mary Alocoque:
Jesus Christ himself, Virgin Mary, and St. Vincent de Paul.

Appeared to St. Catherine Laboure:
Mary, Jesus (under the form of a child)

Appeared to the Children of Fatima:
St. Michael the Archangel, the angel of Portugal (he appeared first).
Virgin Mary
Jesus Christ
Jesus (under the appearance of his childhood)
Saint Joseph

Appeared to many people:
Angels, Saint Philomena

Appeared to the Apostles (when with Jesus on the mountain):
Moses, Elijah

Mary, however, is the Saint who most commonly appears.
This is because she is the Mediatrix ( I prefer Dispensatrix ) of graces (gifts from Jesus Christ which he has delegated her to give out, it does NOT mean she is our “mediator”, people get confused by the similar sounding words).

I would love to know if many other saints have appeared to people.
When Saint Philomena is going to make an appearance or work a miracle,
she often knocks on your walls first (she is famous for the “knocks”).
When Mary appears, there is very often an overwhelming aroma of Roses.
Saint Philomena has appeared frequently.
I personally think that THAT is because she was papally-declared to
be “the Patroness of the Children of Mary.”

Jaypeeto4 🙂
+JMJ+
philomena.org
 
Except for those in scripture all visions are private revelation not required to be believed by the faithful. That said, the Lord Himself has appeared to numerous saints. The one that comes to mind, for me, is Saint Mary Faustina Kowalska who the Lord appeared to many times when He shared about Divine Mercy.
so what does it mean then when the CC pronouces these visions. that they’re real or not?
 
so what does it mean then when the CC pronouces these visions. that they’re real or not?
They are real. But just because a thing is real does not mean I need to believe or even know about it for my faith.

It might be nice to know; but it makes no difference in the cosmic realm of things.

If *I *choose to doubt a personal revelation; that is just fine. My doubt has no impact whatsoever on the reality of what God has wrought; dispite what the Disney movies tell you.
 
In Knock, Ireland, Our Lady appeared with Sts Joseph and John the Evangelist - as well as a lamb. The only animal apparition of Our Lord that I’m aware of.

St Catherine of Siena saw Our Lord. St Joan of Arc saw St Michael, St Catherine of Alexandria and St Margaret.
 
but i’m not a saint…:o
We all can be, God wants you to be, and will help you to be 🙂

And I’m sure some of the Saints started from far worse places spiritually than where you’re at, so there’s no reason why not.

Just aim to be a bit better tomorrow than you are today, and a bit better the day after than you are tomorrow … repeat as necessary. :yup:
 
so what does it mean then when the CC pronouces these visions. that they’re real or not?
Some are deemed worthy of belief but that belief is not required by Catholics because they are private revelations.
A Catholic can go through their entire life without believing in any private revelations and they are no less a faithful Catholic.
 
Except for those in scripture all visions are private revelation not required to be believed by the faithful. That said, the Lord Himself has appeared to numerous saints. The one that comes to mind, for me, is Saint Mary Faustina Kowalska who the Lord appeared to many times when He shared about Divine Mercy.
I agree with Peepicheep here, those visions, are meant to be private for those who witness them.
 
Actually, no many times they are not meant to be confined
to the visionary who receives them.

Lucia’s visions of Mary were intended, for example, to be shared directly with the Bishop of Rome, especially to consecrate Russia to her immaculate heart.
Other aspects of the Fatima visions were intended to be spread to the whole world,
but they were, themselves, re-affirmations of Catholic practices and obligations
(daily rosary, praying for the unregenerate and the dying, etc.).

Same with Divine Mercy: Jesus ordered St. Faustina to make the Chaplet and the Divine Mercy devotion WELL KNOWN TO ALL, and promised very many divine gifts and blessings to those who regularly pray the Chaplet of the Divine Mercy.

Over 70,000 people witnessed the miracle of the Sun at Fatima and all the incredible phenomena that happened along with it ((including the thick muddy rain-soaked ground and all the people suddenly being BONE DRY the split second the miracle of the sun ended)). No way was this, strictly speaking, private to the three Fatima Seers.

As for Divine Mercy, the Miracles associated with the Devotion are way too numerous to be listed, and the Pope Himself declared the Feast of the Divine Mercy, called for by Jesus Himself in this “Private” Revelation, to be a Plenary-Indulgenced FEAST of the ENTIRE Universal Catholic Church, Divine Mercy Sunday.

So statements that “it is just fine to ignore private revelations” may usually be correct, but we have to be careful here. Once the miracles associated with a revelation are numerous, undeniable, and well-known, it can become a Sin to deny that private revelation, because denying it can, in certain limited circumstances, possibly involve a denial of powerful works of the Holy Spirit that one, himself, witnesses, even though he or she never himself received the Private Revelation itself.
For example, LOURDES. Mary’s apparition to Bernadette was PRIVATE. People felt the breezes, smelled the scent of Roses, but nobody “saw” Mary but Bernadette herself. But Mary, privately, told Bernadette to dig in the dry ground and that a spring would appear.
She did, and it certainly did, and it is running today, pouring out Lourdes Water.
And she promised many sorts of Healings to those who would use the Lourdes Water and pray (physical and spiritual healings). We have documented cases of people totally blind with WITHERED, i.e. FOREVER USELESS, Optic Nerves, who went to Lourdes, totally blind, prayed the prayers, washed in the Lourdes Water, and now they can see perfectly with 20-20 vision. But here is the REAL kicker: their Optic Nerves are still withered and dead, thus it is scientifically and medically impossible that they can see at ALL, yet they can, absolutely perfectly. So it would seem to me that, in such situations, denying the work of God, if one knows of it taking place there, would be very sinful indeed.
It seems to me that private revelations are not part of the Official Dogma of the Church, that much is true. And people who have seen NONE of the miracles associated with the Revelation have really no obligation to believe in it. But if they have, or if competent church authority has not only declared it “worthy of belief,” but has also gone out of it’s way to PROMOTE the revelation and devotions (as with Fatima, Lourdes, and Divine Mercy, which were and are HEAVILY promoted by BOTH the Pope and the entire Magisterium), that in these cases, to self-willedly DENY or DISRESPECT PUBLICLY, these apparitions, could at least BORDER on being very, very sacrilegious.
Because the Pope and Magisterium do not LIGHTLY decide to heavily promote such things, especially as when John Paul II made Divine Mercy Sunday a richly-indulgenced Feast for the ENTIRE Catholic Church and heavily promoted ALL aspects of this devotion, as Pope Benedict XVI CONTINUES to do, by the way.
Remember, the URGENT CALL to Pray the Rosary Everyday, comes FROM Private Revelations. The Rosary itself, is at least partly due to private revelations as well as the long-standing use of prayer beads before these revelations occured. And when Mary appears at Fatima, urges people to pray the Rosary EVERY DAY WITHOUT FAIL, promises GREAT spiritual gifts to those who do so, and then works a STUPENDOUS Solar Miracle, witnessed by over 70,000 people including out and out atheists and Marxists, we should certainly give such things a respectful “benefit of the doubt”
at the very least.
Peace and love to all,
Jaypeeto4
+JMJ+
 
when i read such things on this site somebody always says you dont need to believe in these veisions.

as a cathoilic why woun’t you want to believe in these things. this is one of many things we have that other religons dont have at all and are real and true.

reading stories like these makes one pround of being a cathoilic and being in the true faith.
 
when i read such things on this site somebody always says you dont need to believe in these veisions.

as a cathoilic why woun’t you want to believe in these things. this is one of many things we have that other religons dont have at all and are real and true.

reading stories like these makes one pround of being a cathoilic and being in the true faith.
These things can be scary and/or so far beyond our concept of reality that they are hard to grasp.

If that is the case, then the strugle to believe them may come between us and God.

I refuse to dwell on Medjugorie; for example. Also, I have read a few accounts that seem just plain silly. I am grateful I may choose to believe such or not.

One that sits on the edge that I choose to believe is the story of “St. Christina the Astonishing”. (Not strictly a “vision” but very special nonetheless).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top