Apocrypha

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faith1960
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know what you mean, but for the sake of precision, no, the words “deuterocanonical” and “apocryphal” are not “synonymous” (i.e.have the same meaning). As you say, they do refer to the same sets of books, but we say “deuterocanonical” because they are the “second-canon” or “also-canonical”. Protestants call them “apocrypha”, meaning hidden or secret because they doubt their authenticity as Scripture.

As Catholics, books WE call “apocrypha” include books like 3 and 4 Maccabees and Psalm 151…which the Greek Orthodox recognize to be canon. Orthodox call these and our deuterocanonical books by a different term, since “deuterocanonical” has an entirely different meaning to them.
Yeah, that’s why I specified the words when used by Protestants or when used by Catholics. Perhaps a better phrase than synonymous would be “referring to the same thing.”

And do we also not consider the “Gospel of Thomas” etc. to be apocrypha?
 
Protestants are really missing out by dumping the Apocrypha. Some of the most profound readings are in them.
CatholicSpirit;14586449:
Nonsense.
I am a convert, read the KJV through a few times… yes, IMHO, protestants are missing out, many passages in the New Testament make so much more sense now that I’ve had a chance to read Maccabees and Tobit. Working through the rest of the “Apocrypha” now that I know about them!
 
I am a convert, read the KJV through a few times… yes, IMHO, protestants are missing out, many passages in the New Testament make so much more sense now that I’ve had a chance to read Maccabees and Tobit. Working through the rest of the “Apocrypha” now that I know about them!
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top