Approved liturgical calendar?

[gracepoole]

I’m familiar with a web site that includes what it terms a “traditional” liturgical calendar. It is based on the liturgical calendar in use before 1950. Is this problematic? If so, why? If not, why?

 

[Oneofthewomen]

I wouldn’t say it’s problematic, if it is just being used as a resource.

If the website is promoting the use of this liturgical calendar as opposed to the current liturgical calendar, then yes, that’s a problem and it might be best to stay away from that website.

 

[Elizium23]

Yes, it is problematic. A liturgical calendar for the Extraordinary Form must be based on the calendar in effect in 1962, not before, not after.

Fr. Z’s Blog: Universae Ecclesiae, chapel veils, and you