Archbishop Ranjith's Liturgical Guardian

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ockham
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

Ockham

Guest
"2.1 The Liturgical Guardian of the Archdiocese of Colombo which has already been given to the priests in the Archdiocese, and which will be made available for all others from 29th August 2010, is the main point of reference in all matters pertaining to liturgical celebrations within the Archdiocese of Colombo. Please abide by its stipulations faithfully without trying to implement personal views and opinions. Those wishing to do things as they wish make themselves like God himself, and that is self-idolatry. During this Year we shall concentrate very specially towards eliminating all erroneous practices regarding the celebration of the most holy Eucharist, the Sacraments and the Liturgy of the Hours.

…]

2.2 I appeal to all rectors of seminaries, administrators of archdiocesan shrines, superiors of institutions and directors of archdiocesan apostolates to very specially cooperate in this effort. While not exempting others, in such places we cannot tolerate liturgical errors. The Episcopal Vicars and the Deans have been instructed to be responsible for the implementation of the Liturgical Guardian in all parishes and religious houses, while the Archdiocesan Coordinator for Liturgy and the Deanery Liturgy Coordinators have been authorised to closely monitor the progress of this endeavour. Religious in the Archdiocese are not exempted from following what has been accepted as the liturgical law of the archdiocese.

2.3 An effort will be made to make common Latin chants popular during this year. … Latin still remains the main liturgical language of the Church. In Sri Lanka we made a mistake in abandoning the language of our worship altogether. Let this Eucharistic Year be an occasion for us to resuscitate this lost tradition at least to some extent. I appeal to all priests, religious and laity to cooperate.

I also wish to affirm that as indicated in the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum of 7th July 2007 priests and institutions are now permitted to celebrate, where it is appropriate, the Tridentine Mass and the Sacraments in that rite. In this case it is best that the faithful be prepared for it beforehand. I myself hope to celebrate a solemn Eucharist in that rite sometime in the near future at the Archdiocesan Cathedral.

2.4 The sub-commission for Sacred Art and Architecture has been authorized to identify some churches for the improvement of church sanctuaries. I appeal to priests not to start renovating anything without the permission and supervision of this sub-commission. This sub-commission has been recently re-constituted and is headed by Revd Fr Cecil Joy Perera, our Liturgy Coordinator. At the same time the Ars Celebrandi required from us require that we think seriously about Mass vestments, **altar linen, altar vessels **and the liturgical vesture for various liturgical ministries. Let the Year of the holy Eucharist be an occasion to improve all such aspects of our celebration."

archdioceseofcolombo.com/news.php?id=1014

You can read the full document at the link above. The emphasis (bold and underline) is mine. This is clearly the direction of the Church today - reform of the ‘reform’ or getting our Catholic identity back. The pope and bishops like Ranjith are clearly swinging the pendulum back from where it’s been these past forty years.
 
Archbishop Ranjith and Pope Benedict are reportedly close. Is it possible this policy is being tested out in Ranjith’s diocese with the intention of applying something similar for the universal Church? Communion kneeling and on the tongue, latin, gregorian chant, promotion of the old mass with the hope it will enrich the new one, etc. This document probably wouldn’t be any different if the Pope had written it himself.
 
Archbishop Ranjith and Pope Benedict are reportedly close. Is it possible this policy is being tested out in Ranjith’s diocese with the intention of applying something similar for the universal Church? Communion kneeling and on the tongue, latin, gregorian chant, promotion of the old mass with the hope it will enrich the new one, etc. This document probably wouldn’t be any different if the Pope had written it himself.
If only it were so.
 
2.3 An effort will be made to make common Latin chants popular during this year. … Latin still remains the main liturgical language of the Church. In Sri Lanka we made a mistake in abandoning the language of our worship altogether. Let this Eucharistic Year be an occasion for us to resuscitate this lost tradition at least to some extent. I appeal to all priests, religious and laity to cooperate.
The fact that this type of language concerning Latin has been repeated by numerous Popes and other members of the Magisterium should be enough to be highly binding on the Latin Church.
 
The fact that this type of language concerning Latin has been repeated by numerous Popes and other members of the Magisterium should be enough to be highly binding on the Latin Church.
Suggestions are, by their nature, not binding, unfortunately. 😉
 
Mark, what are your thoughts on the Archbishop’s document?
Looks great to me. The “If you break the rules, you are an idolater” language is a bit much, but I guess it’s standard polemic for this sort of document. What I haven’t been able to figure out is what “The Liturgical Guardian” is. I get the sense it’s some document previously issued by the archdiocese, but it would be far, far cooler if Liturgical Guardian were a job and he got to carry a badge and gun.
 
but it would be far, far cooler if Liturgical Guardian were a job and he got to carry a badge and gun.
That would be cool. Can you imagine walking into the Los Angeles Educational Congress with your six shooters ready for action?
 
Archbishop Ranjith and Pope Benedict are reportedly close. Is it possible this policy is being tested out in Ranjith’s diocese with the intention of applying something similar for the universal Church? Communion kneeling and on the tongue, latin, gregorian chant, promotion of the old mass with the hope it will enrich the new one, etc. This document probably wouldn’t be any different if the Pope had written it himself.
catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0800606.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top