Are Eastern Catholics free to reject dogma?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trying2overcome
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Trying2overcome

Guest
Like the dogma of the Immaculate Conception and the assumption and Original sin. I understand that eastern Catholics keep their eastern traditions, but these aren’t traditions, these are things must be believed by all Catholics regardless of rite, right? I saw on a website that eastern Catholics didn’t have to believe in these dogmas…
 
Like the dogma of the Immaculate Conception and the assumption and Original sin. I understand that eastern Catholics keep their eastern traditions, but these aren’t traditions, these are things must be believed by all Catholics regardless of rite, right? I saw on a website that eastern Catholics didn’t have to believe in these dogmas…
Of course they are not. They are Catholics.

And current Catholic Church’s position is that there are no real differences in doctrines between East and West.

It is more the Orthodox who like to stress the differences.

Nevertheless, they are more like differences in accents, not the differences in substantial doctrine.
 
To be in communion with Rome is to adhere to a common profession of faith and understanding of Truth. Dogmas cannot be rejected by Catholics.

Eastern Catholics do, must and should understand dogma and doctrine from their own theological perspective.

Dr. Anthony Dragani, a noted Eastern Catholic theologian, maintains a website that offers commentary of some of the more significant dogmas of the Church, for consideration:

link: From East to West
 
Catholics would generally maintain that these dogmas can be reconciled with Eastern theology. Many, though not all, Orthodox would disagree, but I think most Eastern Catholics would tend to accept that reconciliation is possible. What Eastern Catholics are not bound to is the Latin constructs / language in which these dogmas have been historically framed. It is the underlying Truth of the faith upon which we must agree.
Take the Assumption. The East celebrates the Dormition of the Theotokos. The idea that Our Lady physically died, shared in the resurrection a few days later, and was taken into heaven. This is 100% in line with the Catholic dogma, and while the dogma itself does not refer to Her death, Pope Pius XII does in the very encyclical in which he promulgated the dogma. In fact the entire teaching is based on the ancient tradition of the Dormition.
In regards to the Immaculate Conception, I personally know Orthodox who take no issue with this dogma properly understood. There is an ancient byzantine tradition of the Pre-sanctification of the Theotokos. Her conception is, after all, still a feast in the East as well and only saints are celebrated liturgically. With the IC and original sin it is important to emphasize that the “stain” refers primarily to the LACK of original holiness, the lack of full communion with the divine life of the Trinity, which for the rest of us is restored at baptism. Our Lady was sanctified, full of God’s grace, from the first moment of her conception.
 
Not to be paranoid, but when I read threads like this one, a part of me wonders if the real theme of the thread isn’t suspicions of Eastern Catholics. Does anyone else feel that way?
 
Not to be paranoid, but when I read threads like this one, a part of me wonders if the real theme of the thread isn’t suspicions of Eastern Catholics. Does anyone else feel that way?
It comes across that way to me too. I have gotten the impression online that often Latin Catholics aren’t sure whether those “Eastern Catholics” are real Catholics.
 
It comes across that way to me too. I have gotten the impression online that often Latin Catholics aren’t sure whether those “Eastern Catholics” are real Catholics.
Indeed. I think sometime I might collect a bunch of, well, interesting statements that have the words “Eastern Catholics” and substitute e.g. “American Catholics” or “Irish Catholics” (or likewise to substitute “America” or “Ireland” for the words “the East”) and see how those statements are received. 😉
 
Indeed. I think sometime I might collect a bunch of, well, interesting statements that have the words “Eastern Catholics” and substitute e.g. “American Catholics” or “Irish Catholics” (or likewise to substitute “America” or “Ireland” for the words “the East”) and see how those statements are received. 😉
👍 lol but better not
 
Not to be paranoid, but when I read threads like this one, a part of me wonders if the real theme of the thread isn’t suspicions of Eastern Catholics. Does anyone else feel that way?
Now Peter, we all know that real Catholics pray in Latin…the fact that Eastern Catholics prayed in the vernacular even before Vatican II proves they’re all closet modernists! 😃 😛
 
Now Peter, we all know that real Catholics pray in Latin…the fact that Eastern Catholics prayed in the vernacular even before Vatican II proves they’re all closet modernists! 😃 😛
Well, the liturgical language of Eastern Catholics is not necessarily “vernacular” - it may be some old-fashioned high-style language.

E.g., in Russian Catholic Church (however rudimentary it’s existence is 😦 ) Church Slavonic is still the official language. It has never been “vernacular” spoken in Russia.
 
Well, the liturgical language of Eastern Catholics is not necessarily “vernacular” - it may be some old-fashioned high-style language.

E.g., in Russian Catholic Church (however rudimentary it’s existence is 😦 ) Church Slavonic is still the official language. It has never been “vernacular” spoken in Russia.
I know. I was being tongue in cheek.
Though there apparently is a famous video of Archbishop Fulton Sheen (who was bi-ritual) celebrating the Byzantine Divine Liturgy in English long before Vatican II… would have been quite a shock for Latin Catholics of the day.
 
I know. I was being tongue in cheek.
Fwiw, when I read your post I thought it was a pretty good joke. (But then, I’ve found that pretty much every internet discussion forum I’ve been on has been a black-hole-of-humor.)

But that aside, going back to your original statement that “Catholics would generally maintain that these dogmas can be reconciled with Eastern theology.” I’d like to ask you: How many examples can you give us where you’ve heard someone say that such-and-such dogma “reconciled with *Canadian *theology”?

What is especially odd (to my mind, though I’ve a hunch that many would disagree with me) is that LCs seem to think that they are complimenting Eastern Christians by speaking in that fashion.
 
I’d like to ask you: How many examples can you give us where you’ve heard someone say that such-and-such dogma “reconciled with *Canadian *theology”?
P.S. I could, of course, have simply said “with Western theology” for that example, but I felt like getting a tad fancy. :cool:
 
P.S. I could, of course, have simply said “with Western theology” for that example, but I felt like getting a tad fancy. :cool:
Peter, didn’t you know? Western is the default universal option, and Eastern peculiarities are OK as long as they don’t contradict the default. 😛
 
Fwiw, when I read your post I thought it was a pretty good joke. (But then, I’ve found that pretty much every internet discussion forum I’ve been on has been a black-hole-of-humor.)

But that aside, going back to your original statement that “Catholics would generally maintain that these dogmas can be reconciled with Eastern theology.” I’d like to ask you: How many examples can you give us where you’ve heard someone say that such-and-such dogma “reconciled with *Canadian *theology”?

What is especially odd (to my mind, though I’ve a hunch that many would disagree with me) is that LCs seem to think that they are complimenting Eastern Christians by speaking in that fashion.
I get your point. I still stand by the essence of what I said (or should that be substance? :p), but perhaps there’s a better way to word it. Latin Catholics and Eastern Catholics are in full communion. Thus it would seem apparent to me that we share a common faith. Various Councils and Popes have historically framed this common faith by promulgating dogmas that were formulated using Latin constructs. These dogmas were promulgated as matters of faith for the entire Catholic Church, so on some level they must expression a common faith, but the Latin formulations employed need no form part of Eastern church life. When an Eastern Catholic looks at these dogmas, can he accept the underlining faith without embracing the Latin theological basis? Put another way, is the Pre-Sanctification of the Theotokos an equally valid way of expressing what Latins call the Immaculate Conception? I think so.
 
… but perhaps there’s a better way to word it.
I think you hit on a key point there. For example, I don’t think anyone could claim that the title of this makes a false claim. I doesn’t make any claim at all in fact, technically, but only asks whether ECs are free to reject Catholic dogma. Nevertheless, readers will undoubtedly react with “Wha?” … just as they would if someone said “Are Western-Rite Orthodox free to reject Orthodox dogma?” (a question which, likewise, makes no false claims).
 
I know. I was being tongue in cheek.
Though there apparently is a famous video of Archbishop Fulton Sheen (who was bi-ritual) celebrating the Byzantine Divine Liturgy in English long before Vatican II… would have been quite a shock for Latin Catholics of the day.
That is purported to be the first time the Divine Liturgy was celebrated in the vernacular. The DL took place at Mt St Macrina in western PA in 1955, with the Ruthenians. Archbishop Raya of the Melkites also invited Archbishop Sheen to celebrate a vernacular DL in 1958.
 
Not to be paranoid, but when I read threads like this one, a part of me wonders if the real theme of the thread isn’t suspicions of Eastern Catholics. Does anyone else feel that way?
HI Peter J,

My experience may be isolated, but I did not begin to learn about Eastern Rite Catholicism until I was well into adulthood. In seeking to remedy my deficiencies, I have asked more than a few clumsily worded questions and I sincerely apologize for any hurt caused through my ignorance.

Part of the problem is that I don’t begin to know how ignorant I am until someone makes a new post about an unfamiliar (to my limited catechesis background) topic.

Until a few years ago, I had never heard of the dormition of Mary; I expect to spend the remainder of my life in catechetical catch-up: I have much to learn. :o

Many thanks to my Eastern brothers and sisters who have graciously endured my posts and questions and enriched my faith through their prayers and contributions at these fora.

May God bless us all.
Amen.
 
HI Peter J,

My experience may be isolated, but I did not begin to learn about Eastern Rite Catholicism until I was well into adulthood. In seeking to remedy my deficiencies, I have asked more than a few clumsily worded questions and I sincerely apologize for any hurt caused through my ignorance.

Part of the problem is that I don’t begin to know how ignorant I am until someone makes a new post about an unfamiliar (to my limited catechesis background) topic.

Until a few years ago, I had never heard of the dormition of Mary; I expect to spend the remainder of my life in catechetical catch-up: I have much to learn. :o

Many thanks to my Eastern brothers and sisters who have graciously endured my posts and questions and enriched my faith through their prayers and contributions at these fora.

May God bless us all.
Amen.
Ask away, JT! We’re happy to answer any questions you may have. You mentioned the Dormition (Assumption). The Byzantines observe a traditional two week fast in anticipation of the Feast. Good time to brush up on the Dormition.

You may want to explore a website: East2West.org

This website is hosted by a noted Eastern Catholic theologian, and he presents a series of approachable articles of dogma and tradition, comparing and contrasting Western and Eastern perspective.
 
Thank you ByzCathCantor.🙂
I visit the Eastern Catholic thread regularly and have been to that website once before.
I would be interested in reading books which offer a history of individual Eastern Catholic Churches. Perhaps you have a favorite?
May God bless you and all who visit our thread.
jt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top