Are normal heterosexual women underrepresentated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter caesarjbsquitti
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Never saw a woman applying hot tar to a roof.
Nor have a I seen an educated man doing so…

The very fact that you’ve not seen a woman applying hot tar to a roof, could lead one to believe that they are in fact the smarter sex.
 
Why would you prefer that they hide their same sex attraction?

Would Jesus approve of homosexuals being denied a job, solely because of who they’re sexually attracted to?
Jesus approves of sending them to hell if they don’t change their ways.
 
uh, I have been waiting all day but you are still not making sense, please, please could you just come out, OP dear, and clearly state your agenda. where exactly are these representatives located again?
 
Never saw a woman applying hot tar to a roof.
you must have missed me on the roof of a factory at 55th & the Shoreway in Cleveland in 1978. but please don’t tell OP, he will naturally assume that I must be a lesbian.
 
Jesus approves of sending them to hell if they don’t change their ways.
Is this what your Church teaches? That Jesus approves of sending chaste homosexuals to hell and that it is good to discriminate against homosexuals.

Can I find these things in your Catechism?
 
Is this what your Church teaches? That Jesus approves of sending chaste homosexuals to hell and that it is good to discriminate against homosexuals.

Can I find these things in your Catechism?
Of course not.

I just wish I could see the same outrage directed to those in a position of trust that are deviants and criminals.
 
Of course not.

I just wish I could see the same outrage directed to those in a position of trust that are deviants and criminals.
If your a follower of Jesus and not only he, but his Church also doesn’t support these things…why do you?

For your second point, I sincerely haven’t a clue as to what your talking about.
 
If your a follower of Jesus and not only he, but his Church also doesn’t support these things…why do you?

For your second point, I sincerely haven’t a clue as to what your talking about.
I am not a follower of Jesus as yet.

If you are unsure, I will elaborate.
 
The slip, the Freudian slip that is an error of omission that says alot…

When we look back at ‘the squeaky wheels’ be they women, they seldom if ever mention husbands, or an interest in their family…

Interesting, suggesting that these are not ‘normal women’ of ‘normal families’…

There is more to be said about bisexual women…

Looking only at the representation of women is only part of the real issue…how many Christian women…? etc.etc.etc.
less a Freudian slip than ignoring the original post in light of the one I was commenting on. That said, I suppose I should address the issue of “normalcy” when it comes to personhood. I don’t believe that anyone with same sex attraction can be addressed as abnormal…they simply struggle with different issues. Normal is something I find impossible to define. People are simply different.
 
less a Freudian slip than ignoring the original post in light of the one I was commenting on. That said, I suppose I should address the issue of “normalcy” when it comes to personhood. I don’t believe that anyone with same sex attraction can be addressed as abnormal…they simply struggle with different issues. Normal is something I find impossible to define. People are simply different.
First let us clairfy that you cannot JUDGE the value of a person…that is God’s domain…for one we can only know half-truths, truths, yet not the whole Truth…

Secondly, as far as sexual orientation, their orientation beyond the opposite is abnormal, that is a truth. Gays and lesbians also DISCRIMINATE against the gay or lesbian of the opposite sex; seldom mentioned. Oh and there is some rationality about ‘homophobia’ especially if some homosexual priest abused you as a child. (and no i was never an alter boy…)

Still i know some people who are of that orientation that are better people than ‘normal’ oreintation men and women…so it proves the point…you cannot JUDGE a person…although there are some levels of judging that we can make…they may be clean, they may be irresponsible, they may be smart…regardless of oreintation…?

On the subject of oreintation…what does cause it…its not genetic, so it probably is learned, or a mixup in brain wiring caused by some contamination or drug. So they may be victims of something…

Now the issue of bi-sexuals…what about them ?
 
It would be easier to communicate with you if you would lay out your arguments in a format that could be easily understood. This digressive, poorly-punctuated stuff is pretty opaque.
 
It would be easier to communicate with you if you would lay out your arguments in a format that could be easily understood. This digressive, poorly-punctuated stuff is pretty opaque.
Democratic ?

In the cult-feminists attempt to get ‘more women’ into places and positions, there was no mention of what type of women, and families…?

As Judy Rebick states, 'lesbian women were at the core of the femnist movment, although they did not promote their issues…" seems to be right on !

Of course there is no concern for family, for men, for normal women, for children…?
 
Democratic ?

In the cult-feminists attempt to get ‘more women’ into places and positions, there was no mention of what type of women, and families…?

As Judy Rebick states, 'lesbian women were at the core of the femnist movment, although they did not promote their issues…" seems to be right on !

Of course there is no concern for family, for men, for normal women, for children…?
Cut to the chase. What’s your point?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top