V
vern_humphrey
Guest
What is it about the team owners that makes them special? A thing is worth what a willing buyer will offer, and a willing seller accept.Players say that if a team makes money then it should share its profits (over and above their paid salary) with the players as they helped to create a winning team.
This to me is pure and utter greed and in my opinion sinful.
I wonder, if the players feel that way would they accept a pay cut in their salary if their team loses money?
The player’s salaries and compensation are the result of negotiations between the buyers (the owners) and the sellers (the players.) They have come to an agreement over the worth of the players’ salaries.
Where do we fit in that buyer-seller negotation? What have we done to qualify us for a seat at the negotiation table?
Anyone who has ever been an athelete – even at the grade school level – can tell you the atheletes put out blood, sweat and tears in reality. And they do it in quantity. The owners do so only metaphorically.If they want some of the profits of the team then they should go and be an owner of a team. Pay half a billion dollars (at least) on a stadium that will have a lifespan of 30 years, pay hundreds of millions of dollars each year for at least the first five years with no profit whatsoever and then when you do make a profit, fight with greedy selfish players who say that your blood sweat and tears are theirs.
Personally, I wouldn’t pay a dime to see anyone else play a game, nor buy any article of clothing with a player’s name or picture on it. But there are others who feel differently – and are willing to shell out the bucks.