P
PseuTonym
Guest
I have heard speeches condemning discrimination on various grounds, with the orator providing a list of grounds for discrimination, and the list ending with “who you love.”
If a man and woman have the same biological mother and the same biological father, and they are in love with each other, then what prevents them from asserting that laws against incest are discriminating against them?
Assuming that at least one of them is permanently infertile, there is no utilitarian argument against their marriage based on effects on potential offspring.
Future developments in reproductive technology could conceivably allow a sperm that contains an X chromosome to be the genetic material in an artificial human egg. Future technology might permit a same-sex married couple of two brothers to produce their own offspring. If the technology arrives before there are laws forbidding such reproduction, then it might be possible to persuade them to not produce offspring in that manner, but there would be no way to legally forbid them from doing so.
If a man and woman have the same biological mother and the same biological father, and they are in love with each other, then what prevents them from asserting that laws against incest are discriminating against them?
Assuming that at least one of them is permanently infertile, there is no utilitarian argument against their marriage based on effects on potential offspring.
Future developments in reproductive technology could conceivably allow a sperm that contains an X chromosome to be the genetic material in an artificial human egg. Future technology might permit a same-sex married couple of two brothers to produce their own offspring. If the technology arrives before there are laws forbidding such reproduction, then it might be possible to persuade them to not produce offspring in that manner, but there would be no way to legally forbid them from doing so.