A
adrian1
Guest
What are the best philosophical and theological arguments against reincarnation?
It is true that a person does not have knowledge of previous lives. That is because the person depends on the brain for his memory and that was formed in this life and only remembers what it experienced in this life. However, the soul of the person remembers all its lives and tries to guide the person according to the lessons it has learned in previous lives.Well, a philosophical argument would be:
Given that the reincarnated individual has no knowledge of their previous life, reincarnation is no different than obliteration with the creation of a new soul immediately afterwards. It is ultimately pointless, as, lacking the context of your previous lives, you would not be able to act on any of the knowledge that is meant to be gained through the process.
A more science-based argument against it is simply that there is more life on Earth now than ever before so, unless souls are being created, there is no way reincarnation could account for the world’s population.
Theologically, it just makes no sense, and also removes any real reason to strive for goodness. Yeah, sure, I might suffer for a little while if I steal or lie or cheat, but ultimately I just get another chance, so who cares? Only the worst of the worst are prevented from reincarnating, so as long as I’m not that bad, I’ll be fine. The concept of reincarnation removes the necessity of doing good and following God / the gods (given that most believers of reincarnation are also Pagan.) Sure some people do strive to do better because it’ll earn them some benefit in the next life, but they have no guarantee of what their life will be, so it’s ultimately a blind endeavor driven almost entirely by fear.
I notice your profile states you are Catholic. If you believe that reincarnation is possible that contradicts Church teaching and is a grave sin, including heresy.With God, everything good is possible
God is FREE to act
Reincarnation is possible
so I believe those whose die in infancy MAY be reincarnated.
(Clipped for post length)It is true that a person does not have knowledge of previous lives…
As for the number of persons -…
Yeah, sorry, I don’t buy it. It’s a great concept in principle, but in practice. It seems common for people to say that they’ve already messed up this life, so they’ll just try again the next time around. The belief in another chance removes the urgency and the actual need to do good.As for reasons for goodness - reincarnation coupled with karma gives you enough reason. If you lie, cheat or steal, the exact same thing will happen to you at someone else’s hand in the future - that is your karma and it gets passed on to the next life - there is no escape.
I agree that the Truth is the Truth regardless of whether or not you believe it, but I disagree with it being unimportant. If reincarnation is true, then yes, it’s unimportant… as is the entire concept of belief. Reincarnation renders belief meaningless, as even if I don’t believe in this life, I’ll get another chance. There is no reason to stress over it.Ultimately there is no point in arguing about this issue. What is true will still be true whether you win the argument or not. It is after all God’s will not mine or yours whether reincarnation is a good idea or bad.
It is literally impossible for Jesus to tell us that reincarnation is true while remaining internally consistent and logically coherent. The Bible makes it quite clearly, that we only get one shot at this, and then we are judged.We will know the truth of this matter when the Christ Returns. He will resolve this debate once and for all. I can imagine the chaos he will cause, if he tells us that reincarnation is in fact true. We should wait and see - I don’t think it is very long now.
Just as it is appointed that human beings die once, and after this the judgment.
We were all born, but none of us can remember being born, so absence of memory is not proof of absence. Buddhist texts (and I assume Hindu and Jain texts as well) claim that it is possible to remember previous lives. The Buddha could apparently do this. The instructions to do so are in the Visuddhimagga chapter 13.Given that the reincarnated individual has no knowledge of their previous life, reincarnation is no different than obliteration with the creation of a new soul immediately afterwards.
Reincarnation can be in a heaven, a hell or on another planet in the universe. Merely counting material life on earth is insufficient.A more science-based argument against it is simply that there is more life on Earth now than ever before so, unless souls are being created, there is no way reincarnation could account for the world’s population.
Karma will get you every time. Part of what passes from one life to the next is your accumulated karma. It is doesn’t get you this time round, then it will get you next time:Theologically, it just makes no sense, and also removes any real reason to strive for goodness. Yeah, sure, I might suffer for a little while if I steal or lie or cheat, but ultimately I just get another chance, so who cares?
Neither in the sky nor in mid-ocean,
nor in a cave in the mountains,
is there a place where a man
can escape his evil deed.
– Dhammapada 9:12
This is incorrect. In all the Indian religions only the best of the best no longer reincarnate because they have attained nirvana/moksha/enlightenment. Everyone else goes round again, dying again and again and again and again.Only the worst of the worst are prevented from reincarnating, so as long as I’m not that bad, I’ll be fine.
I am not sure that it is fair to describe Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs as ‘pagan’. Non-Christian, certainly, but ‘pagan’?The concept of reincarnation removes the necessity of doing good and following God / the gods (given that most believers of reincarnation are also Pagan.)
And Christians don’t?Sure some people do strive to do better because it’ll earn them some benefit in the next life…
So “fear of God” is not preached in Christianity and the threats of eternal torture in hell are never ever mentioned?…but they have no guarantee of what their life will be, so it’s ultimately a blind endeavor driven almost entirely by fear.
The difference is that there are external validators for our birth. For example, the fact that we are currently alive. There is no such external validation for reincarnation.I am Buddhist, so I come at this from a very different perspective.
We were all born, but none of us can remember being born, so absence of memory is not proof of absence. Buddhist texts (and I assume Hindu and Jain texts as well) claim that it is possible to remember previous lives. The Buddha could apparently do this. The instructions to do so are in the Visuddhimagga chapter 13.
Good to know. I’ll stop using that argument.Reincarnation can be in a heaven, a hell or on another planet in the universe. Merely counting material life on earth is insufficient.
Again, the lack of finality means that you can essentially push off consequences until your next life. Yeah, you might get a crappy life, but you don’t really need to worry about that right now. (It may be stupid to act this way, but this is how most people react to anything whose consequences aren’t immediate.)Karma will get you every time. Part of what passes from one life to the next is your accumulated karma. It is doesn’t get you this time round, then it will get you next time:
Neither in the sky nor in mid-ocean,
nor in a cave in the mountains,
is there a place where a man
can escape his evil deed.
– Dhammapada 9:12
It was my understanding that in the Hindu religion there is Nirvana, the cycle of reincarnation, and then several various levels of “Hell” where people atone for misdeeds while awaiting reincarnation. Most of these are temporary, but that the lowest “level”, reserved for the worse people with the greatest Karmic imbalance, is permanent. If this is wrong I apologize. I also recognize that Buddhism and Hindu(ism?) differ on the specifics of the afterlife.This is incorrect. In all the Indian religions only the best of the best no longer reincarnate because they have attained nirvana/moksha/enlightenment. Everyone else goes round again, dying again and again and again and again.Only the worst of the worst are prevented from reincarnating, so as long as I’m not that bad, I’ll be fine.
Hindus are the literal definition of Pagan, they believe in multiple gods… I’m mainly considering Hindu concepts of reincarnation here. As for the rest, in my mind pagan sounds nicer than Godless, so I just kind of stuck with that… No offense intended…I am not sure that it is fair to describe Hindus, Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs as ‘pagan’. Non-Christian, certainly, but ‘pagan’?
That still doesn’t provide any overwhelming need to follow the rules. Even if life sucks, if I have another chance then who cares? If I have any number of chances, then eventually I’ll start to get it right…For all the Indian religions, if you do not follow the rules, you will carry on reincarnating. Only those who do follow the rules can ever get off the cycle of birth and death.
No, we do. The difference is that we only get the one next life, the eternal life. There’s greater weight to our choices. There’s a real reason to do good because this is the only chance we get.And Christians don’t?
Fear is certainly a starting place for a lot of Christians, but only a starting place. The ultimate reason to follow God’s will is not fear of consequences, but out of Love for Him that created us. Love for Him that sacrificed Himself to redeem us.So “fear of God” is not preached in Christianity and the threats of eternal torture in hell are never ever mentioned?…but they have no guarantee of what their life will be, so it’s ultimately a blind endeavor driven almost entirely by fear.
Apart from the issue of population numbers, which I’ve agreed is a bad argument, none of my arguments have been strawmen.You are mischaracterising the Indian religions here. You would do better to learn more about what you are criticising first. That way you will not be attacking a strawman.
rossum
All assertions about life after death are unverifiable.…Both of these points are unverifiable assertions, so there’s really no way to respond to them…
As I said it before impossible to prove it one way or another. So it can not be ‘shown’ to anyone.…However, if reincarnation is false, then it is of the utmost importance that we show this to those who believe in it…
It is literally impossible for Jesus to tell us that reincarnation is true while remaining internally consistent and logically coherent. …
Hebrews 9:27:
These words were not spoken by Jesus, so he would not be contradicting himself in anyway if he tells us that reincarnation is true.Just as it is appointed that human beings die once, and after this the judgment.
Yes, it will be quite interesting when Jesus Returns and this question is resolved.
No, it’s not. CCC 1013 says “There is no reincarnation after death” not, “There is no reincarnation after death… except for infants”.Reincarnation IS possible.
CCC1013 seems to apply to kids & older
i’m thinking of infants or pre-born
Sorry for the late response. I somehow missed your post. I totally agree that if 5 billion (or even all 7 billion) people believe something, they can all be wrong.I don’t see your point. If 5 billion people believe something, they can all be wrong.
If reincarnation were true, why would there be chaos? Wouldn’t everything still chug along as always?