Artificial Insemination

  • Thread starter Thread starter tcaseyrochester
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tcaseyrochester

Guest
A friend of my Mother-in-Laws has become pregnant through AI. She is a single woman who says her biological clock is running out. Mom has no problem with this and told me to “get off my high horse.”

What (aside from common sense) is the proper church teaching here (I think I know, but I always gain such valuable insight from all of you).
 
Any time pregnancy is achieved in a manner other than the natural one, it is considered sinful. The Catechism of the Catholic Church has this to say:
2376 Techniques that entail the dissociation of husband and wife, by the intrusion of a person other than the couple (donation of sperm or ovum, surrogate uterus), are gravely immoral. These techniques (heterologous artificial insemination and fertilization) infringe the child’s right to be born of a father and mother known to him and bound to each other by marriage. They betray the spouses’ "right to become a father and a mother only through each other."167
2377 Techniques involving only the married couple (homologous artificial insemination and fertilization) are perhaps less reprehensible, yet remain morally unacceptable. They dissociate the sexual act from the procreative act. The act which brings the child into existence is no longer an act by which two persons give themselves to one another, but one that "entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and biologists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person. Such a relationship of domination is in itself contrary to the dignity and equality that must be common to parents and children."168 "Under the moral aspect procreation is deprived of its proper perfection when it is not willed as the fruit of the conjugal act, that is to say, of the specific act of the spouses’ union . . . . Only respect for the link between the meanings of the conjugal act and respect for the unity of the human being make possible procreation in conformity with the dignity of the person."169
 
If the Catechism, doesn’t convince. Then you might have them consider this by-product of in-vitro fertilication (only one of many). The quote is from a newspaper article arguing in favor of embryonic stem cell research. Notice, it doesn’t place much value on the lives of nearly half a million human beings.

Arizona Republic, 6.16.2004
azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/0616wed1-16.html

“We have an ample supply of embryonic stem cells available right now. Infertility clinics have more than 400,000 frozen embryos left over from in vitro treatments. We can use some of them for research. Or throw them away.”
 
I would question the mother about the fact that the child will only have a mother to bring up this child. Every child has a right to a mother and a father. Our society is so obsessed with satisfying our own needs and desires that we don’t think about others needs and desires. The mother needs to think about the child’s need to have a father in his/her life that is committed to his/her mother.

cheers
Therese
 
This is an interesting moral question and one that was asked in our family. I have a sister that tried for more than ten years to become pregnant. She tried every natural remedy that she could find, even went to Paris twice trying to become one with child. Then they began fertility drugs and tried that for several years with no success. Finally, they went the AI route and she gave birth to two beautiful boys. In spite of the arguments against, she was desperate and was willing to do anything to become a mother. She did have a moral attitude about this and only allowed two eggs to be fertilized and refused any kind of unnatural selection to take place. I know that in her heart, she has done the right thing and has made this choice with much prayer and discernment.

Now I was taught in our Church that God is the one who starts a heartbeat and he will be the one who stops a heartbeat. Now if this is true, isn’t God still in charge of the Conception? This AI process is only successful if He allows it to be, isn’t it?

This is a stark contrast to those who are willing to end human life as a matter of convenient birth control.
 
40.png
JackPaul:
…Finally, they went the AI route and she gave birth to two beautiful boys. In spite of the arguments against, she was desperate and was willing to do anything to become a mother. She did have a moral attitude about this and only allowed two eggs to be fertilized and refused any kind of unnatural selection to take place. I know that in her heart, she has done the right thing and has made this choice with much prayer and discernment.
My issue is not so much AI as a medical treatment for a barren, but married couple as it is against the use of AI for single women to feel “fulfilled.” I feel no moral concern with what your sister did provided it was within the bonds of a valid marriage and that the sperm donor was your Brother-in-Law.

To answer your question, when a sperm meets an egg regardless of how it happens, God at that moment creates an immortal soul within that meeting, thus completing the creation of a new human being. So the eventual “disposal” of all the (thousands? millions?) of “left-over” frozen embryos that go “unused” is equivalent to aborting these embryos. Kudos to your sister for limiting the invitro fertilizations to just 2 and then accepting both of those children as gifts from God, which they are of course, no argument there!

The problem with AI is all the irresponsible people who have 50 eggs fertilized and frozen to ensure 1 will “take”, or the single (or gay) woman wanting children, or women who are not beneath having a child for the specific reason of putting it up for private adoption (call this what it is, its baby selling!) or the use of “sperm donors” that will never meet or know their own children, etc.etc.
 
Homologous AI is morally permissible provided that the marital act occurs naturally and that the AI seeks to aid the natural process.
 
One of the most difficult things in talking about reproductive technology, is that it is so emotional. The desire to parent can be so strong, that like JackPaul’s sister, couples are “willing to do anything” to become parents.

When my husband and I realized we were having trouble conceiving, we contacted our archdiocesan’s canon lawyer for information on the Church’s stance on how we could proceed. We then talked to the priest that married us. I ready everything I could find (which in 1992 wasn’t much) from the Church’s perspective. Nonetheless, thank God, we knew where the line was to be drawn.

During one of our first visits to a local reproductive technology office (trying to determine what was wrong), our doctor scoffed (yes, scoffed) when we told her we were Catholic and intended to stay within our Church’s teaching. She said she had a waiting room full of Catholics that were willing to do whatever it takes to have a baby. Did we want a baby, or did we want to do what some man in Rome told us to do?!
40.png
JackPaul:
Finally, they went the AI route and she gave birth to two beautiful boys. In spite of the arguments against, she was desperate and was willing to do anything to become a mother. She did have a moral attitude about this and only **allowed two eggs to be fertilized ** and refused any kind of unnatural selection to take place.
JackPaul, the process you describe above is not AI, but rather IVF (In Vitro Fertilization).

“One reproductive technology which the Church has clearly and unequivocally judged to be immoral is in vitro fertilization or IVF. Unfortunately, most Catholics are not aware of the Church’s teaching, do not know that IVF is immoral, and some have used it in attempting to have children. If a couple is unaware that the procedure is immoral, they are not subjectively guilty of sin. Children conceived through this procedure are children of God and are loved by their parents, as they should be. Like all children, regardless of the circumstances of their conception and birth, they should be loved, cherished and cared for.” (emphasis added)

The above quote comes from “Begotten Not Made: A Catholic View of Reproductive Technology” by John M. Haas, Ph.D., S.T.L. To read the entire article at the USCCB website, go here: usccb.org/prolife/programs/rlp/98rlphaa.htm

The fact that God allows children to be born from different immoral technological processes does not give them His stamp of approval. (See the paragraph in “Begotten Not Made…” that begins “Scripture is filled with accounts…”)

“Begotten Not Made…” also references “Donum Vitae” (The Gift of Life) Instruction on Respect for Human Life In its Origin and the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day. You can also read this at the USCCB website: nccbuscc.org/prolife/tdocs/donumvitae.htm

I started by telling a bit of my personal story above, because I want anyone reading this to understand a tiny portion of my experience and pain from infertility. I’m not posting these words as someone on the outside looking at infertility from a distance, and I’m not judging. My husband and I were angry, sad, and confused. But we prayed and prayed. I don’t think either of us are surprised to find that God’s denial (and our acceptance of His will) was also probably the most beautiful gift He has given us. We have both grown spiritually and emotionally as individuals, and as a couple, from the difficulties and pain we’ve shared—the pain that God allowed into our lives through infertility.

Ten years and 13 days after we got married, we were blessed with our beautiful, adopted daughter. From Matthew 7: “The gate is narrow, the way is hard, that leads to life.”

In the end, between our infertility and becoming involved in our parish’s Respect Life ministry, I have learned so much about the beauty and sanctity of God’s ***gift ** * of life, and for this I am eternally grateful! I hope the above-referenced articles can help someone else.

AMDG

Debbie
 
Debbie,

thanks for sharing your story. It is always good to hear from someone that has the same experience. I take my hat of to you for respecting church teachings and following what is right. The doctor that scoffed at you was very wrong. Many people think that a baby is a right and that we all should be able to have one no matter what. I believe that a baby is a gift and your testimony backs this up. I am really glad that you were able to adopt a little girl. 👍

cheers
Therese
 
Not to mention that the reproductive technologies (AI and IVF, etc) in addition to being totally contrary to the Church’s teaching/theology on life, marriage, and sex, do not seek to find the source of the infertility, but choose to bipass that altogether. Thus, the incredibly low success rates.

Dr. Hilgers at the Pope Paul VI Institute has been working many years to help couples achieve pregnancy in a morally acceptable manner and has had incredible results. Check out info on his NaPro Technology at www.popepaulvi.com and www.fertilitycare.org. PS! Dr. Hilgers was just on Catholic Answers Live yesterday (6/21/04) talking about his work with NaProTechnology.

👍
 
My friend married a man who had a vasectomy as he had been married previously and thought he was done having children, instead of even looking into reversing this, they went with artificial insemination and then he adopted the two chidlren that this produced, its always botherd me but she is not Catholic and she told me to mind my business when I slightly frowned upon this, so I just pray for her, but I do think its weird, I just don’t know why they could not have looked into seeing if they could reverse his vasectomy, it cost plenty for the artificial insemination and they did that, weird 😦
 
40.png
Ham1:
Homologous AI is morally permissible provided that the marital act occurs naturally and that the AI seeks to aid the natural process.
Makes sense to me…
 
40.png
Ham1:
Homologous AI is morally permissible provided that the marital act occurs naturally and that the AI seeks to aid the natural process.
For those people who don’t really know what “Homologous AI” is, you may jump to the conclusion that it is some form of test tube fertilization that is permissible. It is not. In “Homologous AI”, the conception still occurs inside the woman using sperm from the marital act.
 
Yeah, but you’re introducing a third party (not being God).

And if my memory serves me correctly, lectures given by ethicists Sr. Renee Mirkes and Father Edward Richard pointed this out as a problem. And also that there are some theologians currently on both sides of this question. (As is the case with the question of what to do with all of those stored, frozen embryos.)
 
Here is the pertinent section on Artificial Insemination from Donum Vitae:
  1. HOW IS HOMOLOGOUS ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION TO BE EVALUATED FROM THE MORAL POINT OF VIEW?
Homologous artificial insemination within marriage cannot be admitted except for those cases in which the technical means is not a substitute for the conjugal act but serves to facilitate and to help so that the act attains its natural purpose.

The teaching of the Magisterium on this point has already been stated.(51) This teaching is not just an expression of particular historical circumstances but is based on the Church’s doctrine concerning the connection between the conjugal union and procreation and on a consideration of the personal nature of the conjugal act and of human procreation. "In its natural structure, the conjugal act is a personal action, a simultaneous and immediate cooperation on the part of the husband and wife, which by the very nature of the agents and the proper nature of the act is the expression of the mutual gift which, according to the words of Scripture, brings about union ‘in one flesh’ ".(52) Thus moral conscience “does not necessarily proscribe the use of certain artificial means destined solely either to the facilitating of the natural act or to ensuring that the natural act normally performed achieves its proper end”.(53) If the technical means facilitates the conjugal act or helps it to reach its natural objectives, it can be morally acceptable.
 
well, she indirectly had sex with a stranger… can’t get any holier than that… 👍
 
40.png
tcaseyrochester:
A friend of my Mother-in-Laws has become pregnant through AI. She is a single woman who says her biological clock is running out. Mom has no problem with this and told me to “get off my high horse.”.
If reasons from Church teaching make her think you’re holier than thou, bring up some natural arguments : child raised with no father, single moms have a tough life, will the kid ever know who the bio dad is?, w/ so many donors out there, how will the child know he/ she is not marrying his/ her half sibling?, totally unnatural process . . . --KCT
 
I think the Church, especially today, is on a very high horse…more people need to climb up there with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top